What's new

Freedom of Speech, or Abetment for Violence?

Bill Longley

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Chronicles of Abu Abdul Samad: Freedom of Speech, or Abetment for Violence?

LAW is defined in Marrian-webster Dictionary
“A binding custom or practice of a community: a rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority”
Thousands of Years ago when man learned to live in societies he realized the need for regulations to regulate and live a peaceful, progressive life; so irritants are removed and system runs smoothly.
History of law defines history of civilizations. About 3000 years BC, Egyptians codified their civil law based on law of MATT which Based on social equality and impartiality, after Egyptians Samarians and Babylonians also had their codified laws .
In modern world civilized states are govern by laws. One of the measurement for peaceful society is how much it is governed by RULE OF LAW. laws can be those made by Legislature or Judgments by courts which are called precedents.
Law is divided in two main branches (a) criminal law and (b) private or civil law, also known as law of torts. Criminal law deals with punishments and crime. In criminal law; a crime is always considered as an offense against society and therefore in absence of 'complaint the state or society also becomes complainant against the accuser.
Whereas; civil law deals with offences where private right of an individual citizen is breached by other citizen or organization not amounting to crime.
For punishment of crime, it is divided into two parts:
1. Actus Reas
2. Mens reas
Actus Reas is actual act but until the second part Mens Reas or guilty intension is not asserted the crime is not complete and penal punishments cannot be awarded. For example; if A shoots B intentionally it’s a homicide or murder but if A was shooting a deer and B unintentionally got shot the nature of crime changes and punishment of first case cannot be awarded to second case. In fact intension makes crime serious or not serious.
Muslim world is engulfed in protests from past few weeks due to a satirical film made by an Egyptian American Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, defaming and abetting Muslim Ummah into violence. As the defamation of Islam by this hateful film was not enough an unknown French satirical Journal “Charlie Hebdo” published defamatory cartoons, again torturing Muslims and abetting them to protests which became violent in many cities throughout the world. Both perpetrators of these disgraceful acts took plea of FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION and ironically Government of France and United States in actions seem to accept their pleas. Before presenting our case lets first see what freedom of Expression is;
“An educated man is thoroughly inoculated against humbug, thinks for himself and tries to give his thoughts, in speech or on paper, some style.”
Alan K. Simpson

According to Wikipedia
"Freedom of Speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas via speech. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, copyright violation and provocation to commit a crime"
From above quoted definitions we know that there are limits for Freedom of Expression which is
1. Libel and Defamation
2. Provocation to commit crime or abetment.
According to Word web Dictionary
Libel is defined as false information in order to defame any person. Whereas defamation is an offensive statement or a malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions. It’s also an abusive attack on a person's character or good name
Proceedings of Libel can be initiated under civil law whereas for defamation it’s up to complainant to initiate it under civil or criminal law. Every person has an instinctive moral compass which guides him/her to initiate or un-initiate an action.
Then there offense of abetment which is dealt under criminal law can get an offender jail sentence or even a death penalty depending upon the nature and results of abetment crime committed.
According to penal laws of most Commonwealth states, abetment is a punishable crime or in simple words it is "the act of abetting or inciting another to commit a crime"
According to Pakistan and Indian penal codes;
"To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused “
According to Section 111 of Pakistan Penal Code:
Liability of abettor, when one act abetted and different act done; When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly, abetted it:
Singaporean Law defines abetment as
"Abetment – A person abets the doing of a thing when he or she —
(a) instigates any person to do that thing;
(b) engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or
(c) Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.
What happened in past 3 weeks and most recently in France is not freedom of expression but an abetment for violence for which defamation is used and that too to create an atmosphere in which objectives of abettors become easily in reach.
The Mens Rea for the acts is not hidden and there is plenty of evidence that all these two acts were done intentionally for inciting fury in Muslims to react and to make mockery of 1.5 billion Muslims in Islam phobic and anti Islam satire.
So far more than 60 lives have been lost and that to due to abettors who knew the reaction and intentionally did it in ‘Islamophobia’ and tried to hide it in name of Freedom of Expression.

Why they did it?

Globalization is causing nationalism in whole world and at one side where world is becoming global village on other nationalism and Identity consciousness is also increasing.
There is also U.S. elections nearing and some hardliners who wish to re write the world order according to their likings ,for which they need Muslim reactions to show their People dark face of Muslims , in order to build consensus against them.
Let’s not forget tensions in Middle east especially crisis over Iranian Nuclear Program and Israeli eagerness to involve U.S. to attack its nuclear installment for which so far U.S. is not agreeing , Situation in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan, Muslim Brotherhood Govt getting in power in Egypt, and of course Arab spring which seems to be gotten out of hand.

WHAT SHOULD MUSLIMS DO?

The abettors’ intention is violence by Muslims and then exploiting it for their strategic, apocalyptic agenda. Muslims should
1. The best strategy will be to fight legal battle on the line that what constitutes freedom of expression and what constitutes defamation and abetment.
2. Secondly, a peaceful protest by all Muslims, who should come out on streets peacefully conveying the message that we all love our beloved Master and Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him), more than our lives or anything. These protests will also force Muslim governments to convey sentiments of their masses and make policies accordingly.
It is also duty of Civilized West to see the efforts from the angle of abetment and arrest and punish the perpetrators accordingly. The sad events in Libya and els where and the advertisement run on Pakistani TV channels by US state Department shows that US government feels that a criminal move by a Bias Producer is instigating Anti Americanism. Now US government should arrest and punish the man and those involved and prosecute them against Criminal law of United States.
Summing up Civilized world cannot play in hands of Fanatics. In words of Churchil
“Everyone is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people's idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage.”
― Winston Churchill

There should be legislation in UNO against Defamation and International Abetment. There should be same law for all and no double slandered as era of colonial and imperial empires have ended. Civilized western nations who call denial of Holocaust as crime because it hurts Jewish sentiments should realize that 1.5 billion Muslims are hurt and gets angry when someone shows disrespect or defames our holy personalities. Denial of Holocaust is less an offence then disrespect to a religion followed by 1.5 billion humans.
At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.
-- Aristotle


Chronicles of Abu Abdul Samad: Freedom of Speech, or Abetment for Violence?

Writer is Television Journalist and Hold Masters Degree in Diplomacy And Strategic Studies .
 
.
:agree:
Chronicles of Abu Abdul Samad: Freedom of Speech, or Abetment for Violence?

LAW is defined in Marrian-webster Dictionary
“A binding custom or practice of a community: a rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority”
Thousands of Years ago when man learned to live in societies he realized the need for regulations to regulate and live a peaceful, progressive life; so irritants are removed and system runs smoothly.
History of law defines history of civilizations. About 3000 years BC, Egyptians codified their civil law based on law of MATT which Based on social equality and impartiality, after Egyptians Samarians and Babylonians also had their codified laws .
In modern world civilized states are govern by laws. One of the measurement for peaceful society is how much it is governed by RULE OF LAW. laws can be those made by Legislature or Judgments by courts which are called precedents.
Law is divided in two main branches (a) criminal law and (b) private or civil law, also known as law of torts. Criminal law deals with punishments and crime. In criminal law; a crime is always considered as an offense against society and therefore in absence of 'complaint the state or society also becomes complainant against the accuser.
Whereas; civil law deals with offences where private right of an individual citizen is breached by other citizen or organization not amounting to crime.
For punishment of crime, it is divided into two parts:
1. Actus Reas
2. Mens reas
Actus Reas is actual act but until the second part Mens Reas or guilty intension is not asserted the crime is not complete and penal punishments cannot be awarded. For example; if A shoots B intentionally it’s a homicide or murder but if A was shooting a deer and B unintentionally got shot the nature of crime changes and punishment of first case cannot be awarded to second case. In fact intension makes crime serious or not serious.
Muslim world is engulfed in protests from past few weeks due to a satirical film made by an Egyptian American Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, defaming and abetting Muslim Ummah into violence. As the defamation of Islam by this hateful film was not enough an unknown French satirical Journal “Charlie Hebdo” published defamatory cartoons, again torturing Muslims and abetting them to protests which became violent in many cities throughout the world. Both perpetrators of these disgraceful acts took plea of FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION and ironically Government of France and United States in actions seem to accept their pleas. Before presenting our case lets first see what freedom of Expression is;
“An educated man is thoroughly inoculated against humbug, thinks for himself and tries to give his thoughts, in speech or on paper, some style.”
Alan K. Simpson

According to Wikipedia
"Freedom of Speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas via speech. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, copyright violation and provocation to commit a crime"
From above quoted definitions we know that there are limits for Freedom of Expression which is
1. Libel and Defamation
2. Provocation to commit crime or abetment.
According to Word web Dictionary
Libel is defined as false information in order to defame any person. Whereas defamation is an offensive statement or a malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions. It’s also an abusive attack on a person's character or good name
Proceedings of Libel can be initiated under civil law whereas for defamation it’s up to complainant to initiate it under civil or criminal law. Every person has an instinctive moral compass which guides him/her to initiate or un-initiate an action.
Then there offense of abetment which is dealt under criminal law can get an offender jail sentence or even a death penalty depending upon the nature and results of abetment crime committed.
According to penal laws of most Commonwealth states, abetment is a punishable crime or in simple words it is "the act of abetting or inciting another to commit a crime"
According to Pakistan and Indian penal codes;
"To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused “
According to Section 111 of Pakistan Penal Code:
Liability of abettor, when one act abetted and different act done; When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly, abetted it:
Singaporean Law defines abetment as
"Abetment – A person abets the doing of a thing when he or she —
(a) instigates any person to do that thing;
(b) engages with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or
(c) Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.
What happened in past 3 weeks and most recently in France is not freedom of expression but an abetment for violence for which defamation is used and that too to create an atmosphere in which objectives of abettors become easily in reach.
The Mens Rea for the acts is not hidden and there is plenty of evidence that all these two acts were done intentionally for inciting fury in Muslims to react and to make mockery of 1.5 billion Muslims in Islam phobic and anti Islam satire.
So far more than 60 lives have been lost and that to due to abettors who knew the reaction and intentionally did it in ‘Islamophobia’ and tried to hide it in name of Freedom of Expression.

Why they did it?

Globalization is causing nationalism in whole world and at one side where world is becoming global village on other nationalism and Identity consciousness is also increasing.
There is also U.S. elections nearing and some hardliners who wish to re write the world order according to their likings ,for which they need Muslim reactions to show their People dark face of Muslims , in order to build consensus against them.
Let’s not forget tensions in Middle east especially crisis over Iranian Nuclear Program and Israeli eagerness to involve U.S. to attack its nuclear installment for which so far U.S. is not agreeing , Situation in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan, Muslim Brotherhood Govt getting in power in Egypt, and of course Arab spring which seems to be gotten out of hand.

WHAT SHOULD MUSLIMS DO?

The abettors’ intention is violence by Muslims and then exploiting it for their strategic, apocalyptic agenda. Muslims should
1. The best strategy will be to fight legal battle on the line that what constitutes freedom of expression and what constitutes defamation and abetment.
2. Secondly, a peaceful protest by all Muslims, who should come out on streets peacefully conveying the message that we all love our beloved Master and Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him), more than our lives or anything. These protests will also force Muslim governments to convey sentiments of their masses and make policies accordingly.
It is also duty of Civilized West to see the efforts from the angle of abetment and arrest and punish the perpetrators accordingly. The sad events in Libya and els where and the advertisement run on Pakistani TV channels by US state Department shows that US government feels that a criminal move by a Bias Producer is instigating Anti Americanism. Now US government should arrest and punish the man and those involved and prosecute them against Criminal law of United States.
Summing up Civilized world cannot play in hands of Fanatics. In words of Churchil
“Everyone is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people's idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage.”
― Winston Churchill

There should be legislation in UNO against Defamation and International Abetment. There should be same law for all and no double slandered as era of colonial and imperial empires have ended. Civilized western nations who call denial of Holocaust as crime because it hurts Jewish sentiments should realize that 1.5 billion Muslims are hurt and gets angry when someone shows disrespect or defames our holy personalities. Denial of Holocaust is less an offence then disrespect to a religion followed by 1.5 billion humans.
At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.
-- Aristotle


Chronicles of Abu Abdul Samad: Freedom of Speech, or Abetment for Violence?

Writer is Television Journalist and Hold Masters Degree in Diplomacy And Strategic Studies .



Today every one know 911 was inside job for several reasons, bin laden is almost dead from lung cancer 3years back he was CIA agent nothing more but provided excuse to invade free states ,capture there resources, for oil hunger, started useless propaganda wars to increase hate between Muslims and Christians so little israel emerges as winner, dirty wars started by bush with the support of Jewish war monger lobbies, which sucking 4 billion dollars each year precious money of american tax payers wasted and bloody uniform of there soldiers received to there loved ones ,why bush is still enjoying rather to be accused as war criminal talibans are now terrorist previously they were called mujaheddin who helped USA the most against Russia in USSR invasion against Afghanistan, Romney is another face of bush why no peace in middle east ,gulf states ,Asia , lot un rest in these areas but quiet opposite the most people in Europe USA and here in west enjoying extra ordinary lives extreme discrimination why ? drone attacks ? what about the afganistan situation. U.S used depleted? uranium missiles on populated areas, now there are newly born DEFORMED babies. the culprits involved in blasphemous movie should beheaded sooner.
 
.
.....again torturing Muslims and abetting them to protests which became violent in many cities..

Stopped reading after this. Torturing muslims to protest?
 
.
Today every one know 911 was inside job for several reasons, bin laden is almost dead from lung cancer 3years back he was CIA agent nothing more but provided excuse to invade free states ,capture there resources, for oil hunger, started useless propaganda wars to increase hate between Muslims and Christians so little israel emerges as winner, dirty wars started by bush with the support of Jewish war monger lobbies, which sucking 4 billion dollars each year precious money of american tax payers wasted and bloody uniform of there soldiers received to there loved ones ,why bush is still enjoying rather to be accused as war criminal talibans are now terrorist previously they were called mujaheddin who helped USA the most against Russia in USSR invasion against Afghanistan, Romney is another face of bush why no peace in middle east ,gulf states ,Asia , lot un rest in these areas but quiet opposite the most people in Europe USA and here in west enjoying extra ordinary lives extreme discrimination why ? drone attacks ? what about the afganistan situation. U.S used depleted? uranium missiles on populated areas, now there are newly born DEFORMED babies. the culprits involved in blasphemous movie should beheaded sooner.

Dude, people like you and posts like these embarrass all muslims around the globe. The BEST way to handle the video and the cartoons and whatever else happened or will happen....WAS TO LET IT DIE.
Protesting is every human beings right. Violence and killings are murders, not rights!!! The best medicine for crap like this is patience. People who did these things...KNEW how muslims would react and they WANTED to see you guys burn American flags, and do violence. Guess what? YOU GUYS did EXACTLY that. It's so stupid. If you learn to ignore it a couple of times...there is NO sensation left and this will be considered CHEAP marketing. It'll die down on its own. If no one pays attention to cheap stuff....no one would try to get famous off of it either. I hope you guys realize that burning flags and destroying buildings make YOU look bad and it doesn't solve shyt. In fact, it gives people a chance to see the violence and say, dam, muslims are just violent in nature. What the hell's wrong with people to understand something THIS simple????

Also, no, NOT every bad thing in the muslim world's done by the CIA. Muslim world's has had PLENTY of issues before even CIA was created !!! Read the history please.
 
.
.....again torturing Muslims and abetting them to protests which became violent in many cities..

Stopped reading after this. Torturing muslims to protest?


Thanks for not reading it. ur comment displays the level of ur Islamophobia
 
.
Dude, people like you and posts like these embarrass all muslims around the globe. The BEST way to handle the video and the cartoons and whatever else happened or will happen....WAS TO LET IT DIE.
Protesting is every human beings right. Violence and killings are murders, not rights!!! The best medicine for crap like this is patience. People who did these things...KNEW how muslims would react and they WANTED to see you guys burn American flags, and do violence. Guess what? YOU GUYS did EXACTLY that. It's so stupid. If you learn to ignore it a couple of times...there is NO sensation left and this will be considered CHEAP marketing. It'll die down on its own. If no one pays attention to cheap stuff....no one would try to get famous off of it either. I hope you guys realize that burning flags and destroying buildings make YOU look bad and it doesn't solve shyt. In fact, it gives people a chance to see the violence and say, dam, muslims are just violent in nature. What the hell's wrong with people to understand something THIS simple????

Also, no, NOT every bad thing in the muslim world's done by the CIA. Muslim world's has had PLENTY of issues before even CIA was created !!! Read the history please.


there are two kind of Muslims my friend
1. Muslim by choice
2. by Default

in essay I in clear words said Voilent protests means playing in the hands of those who did this crime against religon and humanity.

Secondly If you cannot stand for ur identity then for what u will stand for.
If I deny Holocast ,I am anti sematic and if I am in europe I deserve jail. But how easy it is to mock a religon and then say Its freedom of expression and so I am free to say what ever I want.
 
.
there are two kind of Muslims my friend
1. Muslim by choice
2. by Default

in essay I in clear words said Voilent protests means playing in the hands of those who did this crime against religon and humanity.

Secondly If you cannot stand for ur identity then for what u will stand for.
If I deny Holocast ,I am anti sematic and if I am in europe I deserve jail. But how easy it is to mock a religon and then say Its freedom of expression and so I am free to say what ever I want.

You are missing the MAIN point. When Mohammed went through torture and cursing and stone throwing, etc, etc (it's in the history). What did he do? Did he torture and kill the same people? Did he ask his followers to go destroy public property, homes, etc, etc????
NO, he RESORTED to peace and IGNORED all that stuff. Now, you are his followers right? So why aren't you following his teachings??? If you can answer THAT, I'll just shut up. The point is, you guys are not even following of the teachings of the person you are PROTESTING VIOLENTLY for. So there is no such thing as 'saving identity'. You are messing up your own identity by not even following the right teachings of your religion!!!

Btw, I agree with the portion that denying holocaust is a crime but mocking a religion of 1.5 billion people isn't.....and similarly people who created these videos and stuff.....definitely had the brains to know what was right and wrong. I think majority of people know that. But the smart thing is to ignore those people instead of helping them get famous and do more of this crap
 
.
You are missing the MAIN point. When Mohammed went through torture and cursing and stone throwing, etc, etc (it's in the history). What did he do? Did he torture and kill the same people? Did he ask his followers to go destroy public property, homes, etc, etc????
NO, he RESORTED to peace and IGNORED all that stuff. Now, you are his followers right? So why aren't you following his teachings??? If you can answer THAT, I'll just shut up. The point is, you guys are not even following of the teachings of the person you are PROTESTING VIOLENTLY for. So there is no such thing as 'saving identity'. You are messing up your own identity by not even following the right teachings of your religion!!!

Btw, I agree with the portion that denying holocaust is a crime but mocking a religion of 1.5 billion people isn't.....and similarly people who created these videos and stuff.....definitely had the brains to know what was right and wrong. I think majority of people know that. But the smart thing is to ignore those people instead of helping them get famous and do more of this crap

It was greatness of Prophet that he forgave those who showed disrespect to him but let me be honest and eleborate my view point with example

if some one show disrespect my father, well my father can forgive him and I am bound to honor my fathers forgivness but it will be shamefull for me to forgive any one who show disrepect to him when he is not present .

I think we muslims have good leagel experts we should fight legal battle and once for all esteblish that freedom of expression doesnot allow abetment for voilence and hurting and tortureing emotions of people.
 
.
....

Secondly If you cannot stand for ur identity then for what u will stand for.
If I deny Holocast ,I am anti sematic and if I am in europe I deserve jail. But how easy it is to mock a religon and then say Its freedom of expression and so I am free to say what ever I want.


You my dear started out right in your OP (there were some $tupid things by the original author but the final message was decent). But now you are digging deep into J i ha di st $hite. Why?

Why would you drag holocaust in this? Do you even understand what happened during that dark time?


FYI. Holocaust resulted in millions of innocent jews killed. You deny it and you are siding with Nazis and with murder and mayhem.

Islamist violence on the other hand is like the one by Nazis, directed against innocent shopkeepers and cinema halls. Now how do you support your ill-logic by comparing Nazi-like Islamists to the holocaust? How on earth you do that?


just pathetic. This is how you ruin your own thread. What a shame.
 
.
It was greatness of Prophet that he forgave those who showed disrespect to him but let me be honest and eleborate my view point with example

if some one show disrespect my father, well my father can forgive him and I am bound to honor my fathers forgivness but it will be shamefull for me to forgive any one who show disrepect to him when he is not present .

I think we muslims have good leagel experts we should fight legal battle and once for all esteblish that freedom of expression doesnot allow abetment for voilence and hurting and tortureing emotions of people.

Funny how you justify killing and mayhem dear poster.

As per your example,

someone accused your father of lying for a 1$. Your father laughed it off. And told you that the accuser is a joker, so do not pay any attention.

Then your father is not around and the same accusation is repeated. Now you have two choices

1. Obey your father, and laugh it off.
2. Shout at the joker, bhand and then burn down your own house and kill your own cousin.

Then you try to convince the judge that you killed your own cousin and burned your own house down to avenge the disrespect of your father.

And judge will accept your distorted logic and acquit you from the crime of burning down your own house and the murder of your own cousin. NOT!


This is the state of so called Muslims that they justify violence and killing in any name and in any reason.

pathetic. just pathetic.
 
. .
WHY ARE U GENERALIZING AND STERIOTYPEING. It is a decent post and if you see stupid things point them out instead of taunting an honorable member

Have you read the post or are just giving judgement

Read again

WHAT SHOULD MUSLIMS DO?

The abettors’ intention is violence by Muslims and then exploiting it for their strategic, apocalyptic agenda. Muslims should
1. The best strategy will be to fight legal battle on the line that what constitutes freedom of expression and what constitutes defamation and abetment.
2. Secondly, a peaceful protest by all Muslims, who should come out on streets peacefully conveying the message that we all love our beloved Master and Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him), more than our lives or anything. These protests will also force Muslim governments to convey sentiments of their masses and make policies accordingly.
It is also duty of Civilized West to see the efforts from the angle of abetment and arrest and punish the perpetrators accordingly. The sad events in Libya and els where and the advertisement run on Pakistani TV channels by US state Department shows that US government feels that a criminal move by a Bias Producer is instigating Anti Americanism. Now US government should arrest and punish the man and those involved and prosecute them against Criminal law of United States.
Summing up Civilized world cannot play in hands of Fanatics. In words of Churchil
“Everyone is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people's idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage.”
― Winston Churchill
There should be legislation in UNO against Defamation and International Abetment. There should be same law for all and no double slandered as era of colonial and imperial empires have ended. Civilized western nations who call denial of Holocaust as crime because it hurts Jewish sentiments should realize that 1.5 billion Muslims are hurt and gets angry when someone shows disrespect or defames our holy personalities. Denial of Holocaust is less an offence then disrespect to a religion followed by 1.5 billion humans.
At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.
-- Aristotle
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom