‘Free Kashmir’ 'Nagaland' 'Khalistan' & 'Dalits" Protests in London and Brussels

[ranjeet]

thats only for photo session it will be removed later.

It appears these British friends of Kashmir are running low on funds hence using placards on private cars. Reminds me of cars of family members during wedding in india with Tannu weds Mannu like A4 sheets.

 

[neem456]

It appears these British friends of Kashmir are running low on funds hence using placards on private cars. Reminds me of cars of family members during wedding in india with Tannu weds Mannu like A4 sheets.

lolz even those weddings have more budgets
on private cars its more of a comedy campaign than a freedom campaign

 

[Sankpal]

I have already answered you. I do not know the UN resolutions personally. I have to read them first.

But I know the basic arguments and gist of it.

You sound as if you have read all the UN resolutions, which I highly doubt.

It is India WHICH IS AT FAULT HERE. Kashmiris do not want to be with India. A Plesbiscite is the right of the Kashmiris.

I do not know how you are interpreting the UN resolution and which one as well.

I need to see a Lawyer's opinion on the UN resolution.

Actually I can say plenty. and I have answered you. Subsequent UN resolutions removed your demand.

I just don't know which UN resolution it is.

Sure, please read UN resolution properly. UN came up with final solution and also Pakistan suppose to withdraw army and non state actors from entire j&k.
Withdrawing Pakistan army is always part of resolution. Good day

 

[Clutch]

Waste of Pakistani Rupees..

Dead try by Pakistan .. total waste

Jealous that we can play that game too? : )

I sense a burnol coming out..

 

[jetray]

It appears these British friends of Kashmir are running low on funds hence using placards on private cars. Reminds me of cars of family members during wedding in india with Tannu weds Mannu like A4 sheets.

lol, it is a half a day affair you see.
Guess what , these cars if they use it permanently they will become easy targets for neo-nazi's. Just some foreign language which looks like arabic will attract a lot of scums in parking lot.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Sure, please read UN resolution properly. UN came up with final solution and also there Pakistan was suppose to withdraw army and non state actors from entire j&k.
Withdrawing Pakistan army is always part of resolution. Good day

Again I will tell you that I have already answered you. Subsequent UN resolutions removed the need for your demand. That is my position. If you cannot accept it that is your fault.

Secondly I need to educate myself on ALL THE UN RESOLUTIONS.
I do not know all of them personally.

If you think you won a debate, you couldn't be more wrong. I have already answered you.

Good day, indeed.

@Sankpal, It is India which is at fault in Kashmir, not Pakistan.
I have already answered you.

 

[Sankpal]

@Sankpal, It is India which is at fault in Kashmir, not Pakistan.
.

Nope.... It is legally integrated with India as like other Indian states.

India didn't need send to 1st non state actors to capture j&k and then army.

I always say, please refer to international sources for Kashmir issue. ( Non Pakistani or Indian)

 

[MultaniGuy]

Nope.... It is legally integrated with India as like other Indian states.

India didn't need to send 1st non state actors to capture j&k and then army.

I always say, please refer to international sources for Kashmir issue. ( Non Pakistani or Indian)

Actually you are wrong. Even the UN said a plebiscite is supposed to be held in Jammu and Kashmir when Sheikh Abdullah agreed to a referendum.

1953 - The pro-Indian authorities dismiss and arrest Prime Minister Sheikh Abdullah, leader of the governing National Conference, after he takes a pro-referendum stance and delays formal accession to India. A new Jammu and Kashmir government ratifies accession to India.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-16069078

The UN does not recognize Jammu and Kashmir as a legal part of India. lol.

That is just parroted in India.

 

[Khanate]

Great initiative.

Civil initiatives like these are key to raising awareness of human rights abuses.

 

[Sankpal]

Actually you are wrong. Even the UN said a plebiscite is supposed to be held in Jammu and Kashmir when Sheikh Abdullah agreed to a referendum.

1953 - The pro-Indian authorities dismiss and arrest Prime Minister Sheikh Abdullah, leader of the governing National Conference, after he takes a pro-referendum stance and delays formal accession to India. A new Jammu and Kashmir government ratifies accession to India.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-16069078

The UN does not recognize Jammu and Kashmir as a legal part of India. lol.

That is just parroted in India.

You just missed....
On 23 January 1957, Jammu & Kashmir led by Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad adopted a constitution for the State and a resolution ratifying the State's accession with India. Pakistan raised the issue in the U.N Security Council and a day after, the UNSC passed a resolution which reiterated the earlier U.N.

It was always, Pakistan suppose to withdraw army from part of j&k.

The UN does not recognize Jammu and Kashmir as a legal part of India. lol.

That is just parroted in India.

Also, Pak Kashmir. ( Including gilgit-balichstan)

 

[MultaniGuy]

You just missed....
On 23 January 1957, Jammu & Kashmir led by Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad adopted a constitution for the State and a resolution ratifying the State's accession with India. Pakistan raised the issue in the U.N Security Council and a day after, the UNSC passed a resolution which reiterated the earlier U.N.

It was always, Pakistan suppose to withdraw army from part of j&k.

The UN does not recognize Jammu and Kashmir as a legal part of India. lol.

That is just parroted in India.

Also, Pak Kashmir. ( Including gilgit-balichstan)

You are lying. That is not what it says on the BBC. This is what it says on the BBC.

1957 - The constitution of Indian-administrated Jammu and Kashmir defines it as part of India.


For the year 1957.

Stop bullshitting here. You will be caught.

I am amazed you are still here. You are not convincing anyone by your garbage.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-16069078

You just missed....
On 23 January 1957, Jammu & Kashmir led by Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad adopted a constitution for the State and a resolution ratifying the State's accession with India. Pakistan raised the issue in the U.N Security Council and a day after, the UNSC passed a resolution which reiterated the earlier U.N.

It was always, Pakistan suppose to withdraw army from part of j&k.

The UN does not recognize Jammu and Kashmir as a legal part of India. lol.

That is just parroted in India.

Also, Pak Kashmir. ( Including gilgit-balichstan)

Stop posting bullshit. You know you are saying wrong information.

Argh, only if these forums were regulated.

@waz and @The Eagle take care of this idiot posting wrong information.

 

[Sankpal]

You are lying. That is not what it says on the BBC. This is what it says on the BBC.

1957 - The constitution of Indian-administrated Jammu and Kashmir defines it as part of India.


For the year 1957.

Stop bullshitting here. You will be caught.

I am amazed you are still here. You are not convincing anyone by your garbage.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-16069078


Stop posting bullshit. You know you are saying wrong information.

Argh, only if these forums were regulated.

@waz and @The Eagle take care of this idiot posting wrong information.

No, this is not wrong . I have posted only correct information. Go and check on UN site. You just pointed one side and ignoring other part about Pakistan

Only Kashmir resolution pass in UN and that was in 1948. Further, nothing changed.

Let me highlight important point...

Now the position is that on December 25, 1948, Pakistan formally conveyed to the Security Council its acceptance of the Resolution of 13 August 1948. India had already accepted it. But Pakistan failed to implement its clauses, and as such, the UNCIP was unable to communicate to India ratification of implementation of Resolution of 13 August 1948 by Pakistan. And with that, the question of plebiscite fell through and was never revived at the UN level.
Why Pakistan did not implement the Resolution of 13 August 1948? We don’t have any convincing answer. Maybe it was not confident about the outcome of the plebiscite: maybe it was apprehensive of losing the strategic Northern Areas (present Gilgit-Baltistan), something which the Anglo-America Bloc was loath to happen. The net result was that the UN Resolutions became un-implementable and plebiscite redundant. That is why former UN General Secretary Kofi Annan had said “that the General Assembly cannot implement the resolutions of the UNCIP.”

 

[t_for_talli]

lol how? Kashmir disputed territory.

Kashmiris want freedom or Azadi from Indian occupation.

It is their right to have that freedom.

Their right was given to them long back,

It was decided 70 years ago, People who wanted Pakistan were given full right to move across the border,
No one forced them to be Indian citizens, Those who want to live peacefully will be welcomed and those not will be treated accordingly

 

[Baghial]

WHAT ABOUT FREE PAKISTAN..........
WE R STILL SLAVES
1947 PARTITION WAS A FRAUD

 

[TMA]

Means , I saw Karachi, Baluchistan poster as well and same apply for them also.

Is Karachi and Baluchistan disputed between Pakistan and Bharat? Does Bharat claim Karachi and Baluchistan to be part of her territory?