France may sell the Mistral-class warship built for Russia to India & China

[SR-91]

India can have both ships built for Russia。

China will build its own。

Build it's own, that's a funny word, u probably meant steal blue prints, add a little input n call it ur own.

 

[$@rJen]

European countries can't sell military stuff to China. Next. (Since 1989 because of Tiananmen events if i remember well)

Yes... i thought the same thing... I guess the report is false

 

[Khalid Newazi]

No politicians have to tell us . We know we were advanced civilization in the world and much older than you can think . Look at our modern civilization in just 200 year as we we went to space moon and soon Mars . Now think about the age of Indian Civilization .We recently found massive port city called Dwaraka which is found to be 24000-12000 year old when it was destroyed . But modern science will say its not possible . So don't go over board Mr.Bangladesh You never existed before 1971

And you never existed before 1947, you were part of an Empire that was ruled by Muslims from Afghanistan and Persia.

Even your name India came from a Persian term.

 

[axisofevil]

India can have both ships built for Russia。

China will build its own。

China had to buy an AC from Ukraine in order to clone/copy. So as for building on your own.....I'll take that with a cup of salt!

And you never existed before 1947, you were part of an Empire that was ruled by Muslims from Afghanistan and Persia.

Even your name India came from a Persian term.

Wrong again. Under Ashoka, India was an unified entity that stretched much larger than present day India. We will be using this premise to expand our borders as China is attempting to do so. Muslims that ruled India varied and they never completely ruled over present day India. Remember, the mulsim rulers had to work out alliances with Hindu kings in order to soldify their power. If they didn't, their days would be numbered.


As for the word India:

The English term is from Greek Ἰνδία (Indía), via Latin India. Indía in Koine Greek denoted the region beyond the Indus(Ἰνδός) river in Pakistan, since Herodotus (5th century BC) ἡ Ἰνδική χώρη, hē Indikē chōrē; "the Indian land", Ἰνδός,Indos, "an Indian", from Old Persian Hinduš (referring to what is now known as Sindh, a province of present day Pakistan, and listed as a conquered territory by Darius I in the Persepolis terrace inscription). The name is derived ultimately fromSindhu, the Sanskrit name of the river, but also meaning "river" generically. Latin India is used by Lucian (2nd century).

The name India was known in Old English, and was used in King Alfred's translation of Orosius. In Middle English, the name was, under French influence, replaced by Ynde or Inde, which entered Early Modern English as Indie. The name India then came back to English usage from the 17th century onwards, and may be due to the influence of Latin, or Spanish or Portuguese.

Sanskrit indu "drop (of Soma)", also a term for the Moon, is unrelated, but has sometimes been erroneously connected, listed by, among others, Colonel James Todd in his Annals of Rajputana. Todd describes ancient India as under control of tribes claiming descent from the Moon, or "Indu" (referring to Chandravanshi Rajputs).



Ad for Persia, never forget their historical roots. They depise Saudi Arabia becaude Persian civilization is surperior in every single way. Also don't forget Bangladesh was aland full of Hindus. Your ppl were forcibly converted for the most part and due to Hindu restrictions, could not re convert back to Hinduism due to sheer stupidity of religious laws back then that even banned Hindus who were smeared with beef and animal blood!

 

[monitor]

France may sell the Mistral-class warship built for Russia to India & China






Sunday, May 10, 2015

By : Want China Times




During the course of a visit by the French Navy to Shanghai between May 9-15, France may try to sell its Mistral-class amphibious assault ship to China, according to Duowei News, an overseas new outlet run by overseas Chinese.

• During the course of a visit by the French Navy to Shanghai between May 9-15, France may try to sell its Mistral-class amphibious assault ship to China, according to Duowei News, an overseas new outlet run by overseas Chinese.
  
  The official microblog of the PLA Navy said that the French task force visiting China consists of two warships including the Dixmude, a Mistral-class amphibious assault ship, and Aconit, a La Fayette-class frigate. Dixmude is the third and last Mistral-class vessel designed for the French navy. It is the first time for a Mistral-class amphibious assault ship to visit a Chinese port.
  
  Russia signed a contract with France to purchase two Mistral-class amphibious assault ships but the deal was scuttled due to sanctions imposed over the Ukraine crisis, even though construction of both vessels — named the Vladivostok and, fittingly if ironically, Sevastopol — had been completed.
  
  The French Navy is unlikely to commission the two new ships and one option choice would be to try to sell them to other potential buyers including Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt or India. Even though China already has plans to develop its own amphibious assault ship, the country may still purchase the Vladivostok and Sevastopol as models to copy.

western country cann't sell weapons to China after 1989 moreover china already has its own LPD/LHD but India Egypt Brazil can buy it . current crisis in Yemen highlight its importance to country who either wants to evacuate its citizen from crisis zone as well as deploying troops or humanitarian mission especially Egypt Pakistan etc.

 

[Khalid Newazi]

Wrong again. Under Ashoka, India was an unified entity that stretched much larger than present day India. We will be using this premise to expand our borders as China is attempting to do so. Muslims that ruled India varied and they never completely ruled over present day India. Remember, the mulsim rulers had to work out alliances with Hindu kings in order to soldify their power. If they didn't, their days would be numbered.

Firstly Ashoka converted to Buddhism and secondly, Ashoka never ruled the far southern part of India or the the South East part of Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Burma. Not to mention Hindustan was actually a term used by the Persians and Arabs to describe India.

The Murya Dynasty of Ashoka also worked the same way the Mughals did, that is work with other powerful leaders in the region without having total control over them.

 

[bongbang]

You never existed before 1971

ROI was born only in 1947

Ad for Persia, never forget their historical roots. They depise Saudi Arabia becaude Persian civilization is surperior in every single way. Also don't forget Bangladesh was aland full of Hindus. Your ppl were forcibly converted for the most part and due to Hindu restrictions, could not re convert back to Hinduism due to sheer stupidity of religious laws back then that even banned Hindus who were smeared with beef and animal blood!

Most of the Bangladeshis were Buddhists. Hindus forcibly converted them. But Im wrong because there is no religion called Hindu.

 

[general_yermolov_stalin]

Firstly Ashoka converted to Buddhism and secondly, Ashoka never ruled the far southern part of India or the the South East part of Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Burma. Not to mention Hindustan was actually a term used by the Persians and Arabs to describe India.

The Murya Dynasty of Ashoka also worked the same way the Mughals did, that is work with other powerful leaders in the region without having total control over them.

hindustan was the term for subcontinent which comprises pakistan,india,bangladesh,nepal,mynamar,bhutan used by arabs and persians.

 

[Khalid Newazi]

hindustan was the term for subcontinent which comprises pakistan,india,bangladesh,nepal,mynamar,bhutan used by arabs and persians.

Yes, but we don't call our country Hinustan, a lot of Indians do (India).

 

[general_yermolov_stalin]

Yes, but we don't call our country Hinustan, a lot of Indians do (India).

Like it or not, the arabs use the term miskin and afghans,persians refer to subcontinent people mockingly as hindko, hindu etc. whether you are muslim or not.

 

[Donatello]

There are rumors that they might sink them......however since India and China have good relations with Russia, maybe they can get the ships and reimburse Russia.

 

[Khalid Newazi]

Like it or not, the arabs use the term miskin and afghans,persians refer to subcontinent people mockingly as hindko, hindu etc. whether you are muslim or not.

I have lived my childhood days in many of Middle Eastern countries and had plenty of Arab friends along with Afghan and Pakistani but have never heard of any of those.

 

[Mike_Brando]

When it comes to developing UFO's and ancient space travel technology, no one is better at that than India. That's what your politicians tell you, don't they!

At least they are better than wearing those dirty lungis and always looking for a way to pole vault into India.Man,don't you guys have some shame or what!!

 

[axisofevil]

Firstly Ashoka converted to Buddhism and secondly, Ashoka never ruled the far southern part of India or the the South East part of Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Burma. Not to mention Hindustan was actually a term used by the Persians and Arabs to describe India.

The Murya Dynasty of Ashoka also worked the same way the Mughals did, that is work with other powerful leaders in the region without having total control over them.

LOL.....sure buddy...The southern regions of India namely Kerala and TN acknowledged his authority and paid tribute. The same with Burma. Bangladesh was under his control. All of it. Sri Lanka was also a tributary I believe.


He was a Hindu before converting. Regardless, both religions are closely co exist unlike Islam.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

European countries can't sell military stuff to China. Next. (Since 1989 because of Tiananmen events if i remember well)

How about Taiwan