What's new

Four Pakistan posts across LoC destroyed by Indian troops: Army

Status
Not open for further replies.
if you go by indian media news india had killed all pakistani soldiers at LOC.


mujahideen actually captured kargil and pakistan army went later after indian airforce starting shelling pakistani posts on LOC along with mujahideen inside kargil.


Lol, common now, even your army has accepted, it was lying about kargil, you can too.
No need to parrot the old lies, about Mujahideen.

Pakistan was moving its army into kargil, while India and Pakistan were still signing Lahore peace declaration.
 
. .
https://www.pakistanarmy.gov.pk/AWPReview/ImageGallery.aspx?GalleryID=170

are they from kargil too? zarb e azb pictures of shuhada


for planting the false news against pakistan army for political gains.

First of all , he didn't plant anything, he is being made a scape goat, to satisfy Pakistans army's need, to see some heads roll.

The leak came from Nawas Sharif's relative.

Secondly if it were a false story , Pakistan army wouldn't have gone overboard denying it multiple times, putting Cyril on ECL, getting information minister sacked.

They would have simply laughed it off and issued a single denial.
 
.
Still better than toilet state
no toilet state.

First of all , he didn't plant anything, he is being made a scape goat, to satisfy Pakistans army's need, to see some heads roll.

The leak came from Nawas Sharif's relative.

Secondly if it were a false story , Pakistan army wouldn't have gone overboard denying it multiple times, putting Cyril on ECL, getting information minister sacked.

They would have simply laughed it off and issued a single denial.
cyril is in USA covering elections.

Lol, common now, even your army has accepted, it was lying about kargil, you can too.
No need to parrot the old lies, about Mujahideen.

Pakistan was moving its army into kargil, while India and Pakistan were still signing Lahore peace declaration.
before 2003 cease fire it was normal to capture empty posts and mountain peaks.
 
.
@Photon
Pakistan army denies it several times its. not fake
Pakistan army doesnt deny it or deny it once its not fake because they are afraid. truth will come out
Shabash Hai bhae tum Indians ko har cheez pai aitraaz nikal laitai ho apni baat manwanai kai liyai
 
.
Indian army is three times the size of Pakistan's army, Indian army has more guns, gadgets, equipments, ammunitions and technology at their disposal than Pakistani army has. So, now who is lying when Indian army say it lost 6 of its men and incurred losses while Pakistan say none of its men died and no losses occurred on its side in last 15 days.
simple we target indian soldiers when it's easy and then move into bunkers. ranger snipers i love them.
 
.
untitledgg-png.341483


Its a turkish base destroyed by PKK
 
.
Lol, common now, even your army has accepted, it was lying about kargil, you can too.
No need to parrot the old lies, about Mujahideen.

Pakistan was moving its army into kargil, while India and Pakistan were still signing Lahore peace declaration.
india moved soldiers into siachin first. why?
if you have answer to this why besides atoot ang then same is the reason pakistan moved army into kargil.

Its a turkish base destroyed by PKK
and the smoke pictures on the day of destruction were released by pakistani media live. acha mazak krte ho.
 
.
Indian army is three times the size of Pakistan's army, Indian army has more guns, gadgets, equipments, ammunitions and technology at their disposal than Pakistani army has. So, now who is lying when Indian army say it lost 6 of its men and incurred losses while Pakistan say none of its men died and no losses occurred on its side in last 15 days.
Indian army had more advantage than this in pampore attack and pathankot but still they took 56 hours to kill 2 in pampore and 5 days to kill 3 in pathankot
So u can expect this from Indian army

Its a turkish base destroyed by PKK
Kitnai confidence sai jhout boltai ho waah
 
.
@Photon
Pakistan army denies it several times its. not fake
Pakistan army doesnt deny it or deny it once its not fake because they are afraid. truth will come out
Shabash Hai bhae tum Indians ko har cheez pai aitraaz nikal laitai ho apni baat manwanai kai liyai

Yes an overreaction to an incident is sign of some one is trying to hide something.

eg. Dawn leaks or After Indian surgical strikes, Pakistan army on one hand claimed, there were no strikes just routine cross border fire, on the other hand claimed , they had killed 8 - 14 Indian soldiers in retaliation

Not even single Pakistan army soldier has even been injured in one month of heavy cease fire violation - that is common sense, especially when they claiming they have killed (8/14 + 5) Indian soldiers in the same period.
 
.
actually indian soldiers are writing history in their own way. they know that there is a place on wikipedia indian claims, so they are making huge claims to do propagandas later.

Yes an overreaction to an incident is sign of some one is trying to hide something.

eg. Dawn leaks or After Indian surgical strikes, Pakistan army on one hand claimed, there were no strikes just routine cross border fire, on the other hand claimed , they had killed 8 - 14 Indian soldiers in retaliation

Not even single Pakistan army soldier has even been injured in one month of heavy cease fire violation - that is common sense, especially when they claiming they have killed (8/14 + 5) Indian soldiers in the same period.
bbc ki report parho to pata chale ga what happened on 29 sep. indians attacked pakistani soldiers sitting inside concrete bunkers. so they lost just 2 soldiers. pakistan army responded and killed indians firing at pakistani posts in open.
the fire power both sides have there. you can't expect to live while being detected in fron of posts.
pakistan claimed 5 indian soldiers because itne dino me wohi aik bomb tek jaga laga ha 2no sides ka. right at the spot. and one thing more, even hercules was not powerful enough to take atmost 100 rounds of ammo to that height. indians they can't have resisted much. once out of weapons 1 was captured alive.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes an overreaction to an incident is sign of some one is trying to hide something.

eg. Dawn leaks or After Indian surgical strikes, Pakistan army on one hand claimed, there were no strikes just routine cross border fire, on the other hand claimed , they had killed 8 - 14 Indian soldiers in retaliation

Not even single Pakistan army soldier has even been injured in one month of heavy cease fire violation - that is common sense, especially when they claiming they have killed (8/14 + 5) Indian soldiers in the same period.
The reaction was because of international noise which was created by the fake story
And does Your common sense dies when India claims of killing 40+ jihadis in surgical strike with out sustaining a single injury
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom