Bengal71
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2018
- Messages
- 4,535
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
He ruled long enough to piss off a large majority of Egyptians.
Look no further than to the U.K., where the Prime Minister resigned when it was apparent that there was no confidence. When Morsi found out about lack of support, he should have called for a vote of confidence, and resigned if he failed, or implemented his policies if he succeeeded.
Al Sisi called for new elections after Morsi was ousted and won.
Whether those elections were free and fair, I cannot tell.
An no, the West does not defend Al Sisi. He got a lot of criticism and relations between Egypt and the West soured as a result.
Your racist remarks have no foundation in reality.
There is no racist remark in my post, don't make false accusations.
Mursi was ousted by a military coup, the protests were also organized by the Egyptian militqry establishment that actually controlled the country, it was funded and orchestrated by the Saudis and Emiratis, may even be the Israelis and had tacit support of the US. Mursi took over a country royally screwed up by the dictator for decades. A democratic election is held so a party/leader can show his performance throughout hi tenure and based on that re-elected or removed. Anybody who says Mursi had 'problems' so removing his within a year by a coup obviously has vested interest.
The west did lip service criticism, we know that. They even conspired to remove Erdogan, let alone Mursi.