Forgotten heroes- Sir Zafrullah Khan (rh)

[M. Sarmad]

Where is the letter? All I hear is he said she said they said...

 

[Dubious]

That is not a letter but someone feeding you their ideas as facts...A copy of the letter would be a letter.....An interview of the people (if they are still alive and all) would be proof...

 

[Chronos]

Right...but I doubt he needed to hide...back then it was just literally "collecting" as many Muslims as possible for Pakistan's success....

I am always skeptical about what the West wrote or whatnot...They even wrote the Indian freedom fighters as terrorists and whatever they wished to write...hence, I rarely bother what they have to say ...it rarely is history but a mere opinion!

Technically they are. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist.

Well in all fairness if Shias should keep their beliefs strictly religious and not political then Sunnis should be held to that same standard sirjee, no?

No. You don't get it. As long as it doesn't affect HIS beliefs and HIS freedoms it is O.K.

 

[M. Sarmad]

That is not a letter but someone feeding you their ideas as facts...A copy of the letter would be a letter.....An interview of the people (if they are still alive and all) would be proof...

However, when the British saw that their objectives could not be met, they unilaterally rejected all proposals submitted by the Muslims. At this point, Zafarullah Khan was asked to submit a proposal on the partition of India, about which the Viceroy wrote to the Secretary of State for India:

Upon my instruction Zafarullah wrote a memorandum on the subject. Two Dominion States. I have already sent it to your attention. I have also asked him for further clarification, which, he says, is forthcoming. He is anxious, however, that no one should find out that he has prepared this plan. He has, however, given me the right to do with it what I like, including sending a copy to you. Copies have been passed on to Jinnah, and, I think, to SirAkbar Hydari. While he, Zafarullah, cannot admit its authorship, his document has been prepared for adoption by the Muslim League with a view to giving it the fullest publicity.[4]

— Lord Linlithgow, April 12, 1940


Muhammad Zafarullah Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Anyways you can believe in whatever you want .
Peace

 

[Dubious]

However, when the British saw that their objectives could not be met, they unilaterally rejected all proposals submitted by the Muslims. At this point, Zafarullah Khan was asked to submit a proposal on the partition of India, about which the Viceroy wrote to the Secretary of State for India:

Upon my instruction Zafarullah wrote a memorandum on the subject. Two Dominion States. I have already sent it to your attention. I have also asked him for further clarification, which, he says, is forthcoming. He is anxious, however, that no one should find out that he has prepared this plan. He has, however, given me the right to do with it what I like, including sending a copy to you. Copies have been passed on to Jinnah, and, I think, to SirAkbar Hydari. While he, Zafarullah, cannot admit its authorship, his document has been prepared for adoption by the Muslim League with a view to giving it the fullest publicity.[4]

— Lord Linlithgow, April 12, 1940


Muhammad Zafarullah Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Anyways you can believe in whatever you want .
Peace

Its not about what I want to believe but evidence....Anyone can say/ write anything....British rejected proposals by Muslims but Zafarullah Khan was asked to submit? Did the British Lord Linlithgow just call him Non Muslim?

 

[Chronos]

However, when the British saw that their objectives could not be met, they unilaterally rejected all proposals submitted by the Muslims. At this point, Zafarullah Khan was asked to submit a proposal on the partition of India, about which the Viceroy wrote to the Secretary of State for India:

Upon my instruction Zafarullah wrote a memorandum on the subject. Two Dominion States. I have already sent it to your attention. I have also asked him for further clarification, which, he says, is forthcoming. He is anxious, however, that no one should find out that he has prepared this plan. He has, however, given me the right to do with it what I like, including sending a copy to you. Copies have been passed on to Jinnah, and, I think, to SirAkbar Hydari. While he, Zafarullah, cannot admit its authorship, his document has been prepared for adoption by the Muslim League with a view to giving it the fullest publicity.[4]

— Lord Linlithgow, April 12, 1940


Muhammad Zafarullah Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Anyways you can believe in whatever you want .
Peace

Is there a more credible source than wikipedia?

 

[M. Sarmad]

Is there a more credible source than wikipedia?

check the previous posts

Its not about what I want to believe but evidence....Anyone can say/ write anything....British rejected proposals by Muslims but Zafarullah Khan was asked to submit? Did the British Lord Linlithgow just call him Non Muslim?

"Facts are Facts"(pub. 1986) was written by Khan Abdul Wali Khan gradually over many years and included critical and declassified British Imperial documents before the creation of Pakistan . These declassified documents must be verifiable . And as much as I know , no one has ever claimed that Wali Khan has lied in this regard .

Zafarullah Khan was a member of Viceroy`s executive council , thats why he was asked to submit a map of two dominions . His scheme was not much different from the scheme of Sir Sikander Hayat Khan , thats why some claim that Sikander was original author of Lahore resolution , but Viceroy`s letter (when declassified) made everything clear . Sikander himself claimed in 1941 that he drafted the resolution but later the working committee of ML changed its shape . ML committee never rejected his claim . The fact is (as became clear from viceroy`s letter) , that it was not the working committee of ML who changed its shape , but it was Zafarullah Khan who drafted a `new` resolution . AND yes , ML was pretty much a British controlled political Party !!!

@Talon Now read the article by Dr. Safdar Mehmood that how he has omitted some facts and twisted the others to obtain "desired" conclusion

 

[Zarvan]

Seeing as though the 6th of February was the birthday of one of the founding members of Pakistan, and unfortunately to my dismay, I didn't see or hear a single mention of this outstanding gentleman in any print or other media, I would like to dedicate this thread to another forgotten Pakistani hero.

I'd also like to suggest that religious discussion is kept out of this thread as I have no wish to ruin the occasion with slander and disagreement instead of celebrating the Thomas Jefferson of Pakistan.
This threat is also an answer to those who continually accuse Ahmadis of being anti Pakistan and undermining Pakistan. I've also included a few tributes written by various prominent Arab Personalities of his time.

Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarullah Khan's Services
to Pakistan and The Muslim World
By M. J. As'ad

Services to Pakistan

The British Prime Minister made a formal announcement in the House of Commons on February 20, 1947, that the whole responsibility for the government and administration of India would be transferred to Indian hands and that if no settlement is arrived at between the political parties in India, the responsibility would be transferred to a Central Government and to provinces and other authorities in such a manner as may appear to His Majesty's Government to be in the best interest of India. This was the time when the coalition Ministry in the Punjab, headed by Malik Khizar Hayat Tiwana, was at loggerheads with Punjab Muslim League. At this critical juncture, Zafarullah Khan in his letter dated February 22, 1947 advised Khizar Hayat Khan to tender his resignation in the larger interest of the Indian Muslims. Acting on this advice, Khizar Hayat Khan resigned on March 2, 1947. Zafarullah Khan's letter, interalia, says: "It has now become imperative that the Muslims should close their ranks and should carry on a united struggle to secure their future in India. All other considerations sink into insignificance in comparison with this. You will appreciate that it is not possible to set out in the space of a letter all the factors to which the situation has given rise. I can only assure you that before writing to you I have considered the problem in as many of its aspects as my mind has been able to grasp.
The deliberate conclusion at which I have arrived is that notwithstanding every possible consideration to the contrary, personal, party or ideologic, you ought to seize this opportunity to come to a settlement with the League so that henceforth all efforts in the Punjab should have a unified direction and Muslims should devote themselves to safeguarding their future not only in the Punjab but throughout India. You should make immediate contact with the leaders of the Muslim League in the Punjab, whether they are in jail or outside of it, and tell them that the situation created by the British Prime Minister's statement renders it imperative that you should come to an understanding with each other. You should also make it quite clear to them that on your side you do not insist upon remaining in power nor lay down any condition with regard to how the Ministry should be reconstituted. If on their side they insist that your Muslim supporters in the Assembly should join them unconditionally I would earnestly request you to accept the condition."

Even the draft of the statement issued by Khizar Hayat Khan on his resignation was prepared by Muhammad Zafarullah Khan.

Commenting on Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarullah Khan's vigorous advocacy of the Muslim League case before Radcliff Commision, the Urdu daily Nawa- i-Waqt, Lahore, dated August 1, 1947, writes: "For four days on end Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarullah Khan argued the Muslim case in most forceful, most brilliant and most reasonable manner. Success is in the hands of Providence, but the excellence and the ability with which Zafarullah Khan advocated the Muslims case has given satisfaction to the Muslims inasmuch as they feel that their just and righteous cause has been represented before the powers that be in the best possible manner. We are confident that all Muslims of the Punjab, whatever their religious beliefs, would acknowledge and be grateful for this service."

Iftikhar Husain Khan, Nawab of Mamdot, the President of Punjab Muslim League, in his letter dated August 8, 1947, to Muhammad Zafarullah Khan, who argued Pakistan's case before Radcliff Commission, under instructions from Quaid-e-Azam, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, writes: "Now that the Boundary Commission has concluded its hearings, I wish to express deep sense of gratitude which I and all other Mussalmans of the Punjab feel towards you. Your unremitting toil in the collection of material, your brilliant presentation of our case and your profound interpretation of law and history have won universal admiration. In this most critical hour of our history, you have rendered an inestimable service to the Millat and created a lasting place in the hearts of all Mussalmans. We can never forget how willingly you agreed to interrupt your important discussions in London, return and fulfil this patriotic mission. The knowledge that your zeal was inspired solely by your love for Islam fills our hearts with pride and gratitude."

Mr. Justice Muhammad Munir, a judge of the Lahore High Court (who later rose to the office of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan) who presided over the Court of Inquiry set up by the Government of Punjab, to enquire into the Punjab disturbances on 1953, in his report - commonly known as `Munir Report' - describes as `vile and unfounded' the charges levelled against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community that the district of Gurdaspur was assigned to India by the Award of the Boundary Commission because of the gratitude adopted by the Ahmadi Muslims and the arguments addressed by Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan who had been selected by Quaid-e- Azam to represent the case of Muslim League before the Commission. He says: "The President of this Court who was a member of that Commission considers it his duty to record his gratitude to Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan for the valian fight he put up for Gurdaspur. This is apparent from the record of the Boundary Commission which anyone who is interested may see. For the selfless services rendered by him to the Muslim Community, it is shameless ingratitude for anyone to refer to Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan in a manner which has been referred by certain parties before the Court of Inquiry." (Munir Report page 197)

Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, who in June 1947 was appointed as a member of the Steering Committee of the Partition Council for India and Pakistan, was Secretary General, Government of Pakistan, after the establishment of the new State, became Finance Minister in 1951 and Prime Minister in 1955, while referring to the debate on Kashmir in the Security Council and Pakistan's reply on January 15, 1948 to India's complaint, in his monumental book "The Emergence of Pakistan" states that: "Zafarullah Khan's masterly exposition of the case convinced the Security Council that the problem was not simply one of expelling so called raiders from Kashmir, as the Indian representative would have them believe, but of placing Indo-Pakistan relations on a just and peaceful basis and solving the Kashmir dispute in accordance with the will of the people of the State."
The Canada Stary Weekly, Toronto, in its issue of May 28, 1949, says: "The man who more than any other single person has put Pakistan on the international map as a force to be reckoned with is Sir Muhammad Zafarullah Khan."

When some disgruntled persons made a row against Muhammad Zafarullah Khan in 1952, the daily Dawn, Karachi, dated May 22, 1952, condemned these elements and observed: "The Pakistani nation cannot be so ungrateful to Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarullah Khan (who is serving her with great sincerity and devotion) as to be misled by the uproar of a handful of reactionaries - uproar of a small number of people who are prisoners of their own obscurantism."

Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, a former Prime Minster of Pakistan, already mentioned above, in his letter to Muhammad Zafarullah Khan, dated October 3, 1955, expresses his "deep sense of gratitude and admiration for the disinterested and untiring way, you are continuing to serve Pakistan and the cause of Islam." He adds "It was very good of you to have visited Syria and Lebanon and done so much for Pakistan and I might add Islam."

Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada, a former Foreign Minister of Pakistan and President of the Pakistan Legal Aid Association, says: "From Sialkot to the Security Council, from Round Table Conferences to international conferences, from the Join Parliamentary Committee on Constitutional Reforms to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, from the Viceroy's Executive Council to the Pakistan Cabinet, from the Indian Assembly to the General Assembly of the United Nations and from the Federal Court of the sub-continent to the International Court of Justice, Chaudhry Zafarullah's contribution is clean and consistent, creditable and commendable."(Dawn, Karachi, March 3, 1964)

Former Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto sent a message of appreciation to Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarullah Khan on his retirement from the Presidentship of the International Court of Justice at The Hague. His message read: "I wish to convey to you our deep appreciation for the services you have so selflessly rendered over several decades to the people of Pakistan as well as to the international community. As a leading member of the political movement, which led to the achievement of a homeland of the Muslims in the sub-continent and earlier as President of the All India Muslim League in 1931, you played a very significant role in the creation of Pakistan. As Foreign Minister of Pakistan for the first seven years after the birth of the country, you helped in establishing Pakistan as a state which commanded respect abroad and whose voice carried weight in international forms. Your services to Pakistan, however, did not end there. As President of the UN General Assembly and as a judge of the International Court of Justice you not only served the international community as a whole, but in doing so enhanced the prestige of Pakistan. I can say with full confidence that all of us shared the pride that one naturally felt at the respect you commanded in the international community and the United Nations in your various capacities."

Services to the Muslim World
Muhammad Zafarullah Khan's logical and forceful advocacy of the cause of the Arabs in particular, and his support to the aspirations of the subject nations of Africa and the Third World, in general, on the forum of the United Nations and outside it, won him universal appreciation and respect.

The Statesman, Delhi, dated October 8, 1947, editorially observes: "For the first time the voice of Pakistan was heard in the counsels of the United Nations on a burning topic of world-wide significance when leader of this country's delegation, Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan, addressed the United Nations Palestine Committee at Lake Success on Tuesday. It was a telling speech which tore into shreds the specious pleas put forward by the advocates of the partition of Palestine. Chaudhry Zafarullah did not merely indulge in rhetoric when he described the partition plan as `physically and geographically a monstrosity', he proceeded to prove this by unassailable arguments. Answering the contention that the migration of more Jews into Palestine should be permitted because the Jewish displaced persons desired to go to that country, Pakistan's spokesman asked whether the Americans would consent to relax or abrogate their own immigration laws if displaced persons of various other nationalities desired to enter the United States and settle there? Would America, he further asked, agree to take in the five million displaced persons of the Punjab if they desired to leave the scene of their suffering and cross over to the United States. We have little doubt that the Arabs will rejoice to find the voice of Pakistan so powerfully raised in the United Nations in defence of their cause. The addition of the independent sovereign state of Pakistan to the comity of free Muslim peoples of the World is already beginning to have its effect on international affairs," the paper concluded.

The same paper in its issue, dated October 11, 1947, quotes "an Arab Spokesman" on Muhammad Zafarullah Khan's speech before the Palestine Committee of United Nations General Assembly, on October 7, 1947, as saying: "It was a most brilliant and exhaustive survey of the Arab case regarding Palestine that I have ever heard."

In one of his letters in Urdu dated March 6, 1948, addressed to a Pakistani, Khawaja Hassan Nizami, the well-known Muslim divine of Delhi, in reference to the brilliant advocacy of the Palestine cause by Muhammad Zafarullah Khan at the United Nations, writes:
"The fact of the matter is that Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan has done a job for which 80 crore Muslims of the World owe him a debt of gratitude. I never hesitate to mention this fact to all, the intelligentsia and the common people alike. Even in my speeches at big public gatherings. I freely express this view."

His Majesty King Faisal-al-Saud, who in his capacity as Foreign Minister of Saudia Arab headed the Saudi Arabian delegation to the United Nations, in a letter, dated May 5, 1948, to Muhammad Zafarullah Khan, thanked him `for your close co-operation and the noble stand which your Excellency has taken, not only during the meeting but since the question of Palestine has been put before the United Nations. Allow me to state that your high principles have created a desire on the part of all righteous persons to identify themselves with the efforts of your Excellency, not only on behalf of the Arabs, but Moslems all over the world as well', the letter adds.

Well we respect services of a Non Muslim to Muslim world we have no problem if a non Muslim living in our country want to provide some services

 

[NYahmadi1]

Well we respect rvices of a Non Muslim to Muslim world we have no problem if a non Muslim living in our country want to provide some services

Hi. First reply on this forum.
Im glad you appreciate our service to Pakistan. Ofcourse as Pakistanis and Muslims, it is the duty of every Ahmadi to to serve the interest of the nation. This is particularly important considering how the majority of so called muslims such as yourself have done nothing but spread jahaluth and general stupidity. The fact of the matter is we Ahmadi muslims have struggled to save you the ignorant ones from your own insanity. If u doubt it just examine what u "muslims" have done to yourselves by opening to any newspaper.
Bottom line, what Ahmadis do, they do for Pakistan. What you fools do is only to further your own inane deluded bullshit and corruption, and call it serving Islam.

 

[bandit]

Sometimes I so wonder, we dont even need to attack Pakistan, with bigots like so many on this thread attacking a national hero for his personal beliefs, pakistan is soon gonna kill itself.

Sad.

 

[Spring Onion]

Not really, you just keep posting random topics to sling mud on the integrity of Zafrullah Khan sahib, all your posts on this thread are of that nature. Especially the topics that are not even mention in the opening post, this suggests that you have no objection with what was said in it but you are just attempting to create diversionary topics in a bid to show that Zafrullah sahibs contribution towards Pakistan is nothing.

That's all you mullahs good for, mud slinging and creating fairy tales. Seems like you are doing both on this thread.

NO one is denying great services of Zafrullah Khan . Since you are putting forward religious color to it then you must be ready to accept the truth about his religious bias too.

The history says that Zafrullah refused to offer funeral prayer of Jinnah because the prayer leader maulana was NOT an ahmedi/qadyani.

 

[Pakistani E]

NO one is denying great services of Zafrullah Khan . Since you are putting forward religious color to it then you must be ready to accept the truth about his religious bias too.

The history says that Zafrullah refused to offer funeral prayer of Jinnah because the prayer leader maulana was NOT an ahmedi/qadyani.

You are deluded, I think you should re-read not only some of the posts left by some Pakistanis here but also maybe step outside of your house and in to your nearest mosque and then ask about Zafrullah sahib. You are deliberately playing ignorant here by saying "NO one is denying great services of Zafrullah Khan". really? Have you been living in Pakistan for the last 30 years or not?

As for religion, the only point I made about religion was primarily because it is said that ahmadis are enemies of Pakistan etc. To disqualify this distortion of history, I gave a historical example of just one ahmadis' contribution towards Pakistan.

It is you and other Pakistanis like you that keep brining up his religion. Which leads me to conclude that some Pakistanis are more obsessed with the faith of others than they are of themselves. I mean one only has to open a local newspaper in Pakistan to see how well the Pure Sarkari muslims are doing.

Right so just to top it up, you randomly throw out the old he didn't read his funeral but distort it to meet your own thinking. It was not because the Maualana was not Ahmadi, but because the your esteem mullah had declared ahmadis to be kafir. Now let me ask you, would you say your prayer behind someone who calls you a kafir?

(And well done for turning this into a another religious thread, I'm sure you'll get some extra brownie points in the afterlife to jump through some lower levels of paradise.)

 

[Spring Onion]

You are deluded, I think you should re-read not only some of the posts left by some Pakistanis here but also maybe step outside of your house and in to your nearest mosque and then ask about Zafrullah sahib. You are deliberately playing ignorant here by saying "NO one is denying great services of Zafrullah Khan". really? Have you been living in Pakistan for the last 30 years or not?

As for religion, the only point I made about religion was primarily because it is said that ahmadis are enemies of Pakistan etc. To disqualify this distortion of history, I gave a historical example of just one ahmadis' contribution towards Pakistan.

It is you and other Pakistanis like you that keep brining up his religion. Which leads me to conclude that some Pakistanis are more obsessed with the faith of others than they are of themselves. I mean one only has to open a local newspaper in Pakistan to see how well the Pure Sarkari muslims are doing.

Right so just to top it up, you randomly throw out the old he didn't read his funeral but distort it to meet your own thinking. It was not because the Maualana was not Ahmadi, but because the your esteem mullah had declared ahmadis to be kafir. Now let me ask you, would you say your prayer behind someone who calls you a kafir?

(And well done for turning this into a another religious thread, I'm sure you'll get some extra brownie points in the afterlife to jump through some lower levels of paradise.)

you can offer your prayers if you think he is wrong in calling you kafir then why you dint offer prayer.

Great Zafrullah should have been above such bias but he did show his bias by not offering Jinnah's funeral prayer.

He wanted a qadyani leading the prayer.

 

[M. Sarmad]

you can offer your prayers if you think he is wrong in calling you kafir then why you dint offer prayer.

Great Zafrullah should have been above such bias but he did show his bias by not offering Jinnah's funeral prayer.

He wanted a qadyani leading the prayer.

Sir Zafarullah Khan went to attend Jinnah`s funeral . In his own words :

“So! My intention in being there was to offer the congregational prayers along with everyone else---- if I had not intended and fervently desired to pray for my leader, would it not have been more logical and make sense for me have stayed home--- and not having come to the funeral?

He did not attend the funeral , not because he wanted some Ahmedi to lead it (which was very unlikely anyways) , but because it was being led by a person who considered ahmedis to be kafir , In words of Zafarullah Khan :

“I was told that the cleric (mullah) who was to lead the prayer was none other than a person named Shabir Usmani who had used vile and abusive language against the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement.”

Now tell me that will any one offer prayers behind a person who abuses his prophet / Messiah ??



This man (Shabbir Usmani) had declared that Shia were Kafir too , ironically he led the public funeral prayers of Jinnah ; A Shia whose coffin was transported from the Governor’s House to the burial location constantly accompanied by a black Alam (flag) on which was inscribed “Ya Hazrat-e-Abbas” !!!

“The [Sindh High] court pro-ceedings bear evidence of the last rites observed by Miss Jinnah immediately after her brother’s death. Witness Syed Anisul Hasnain, a Shia scholar, deposed that he had arranged the ghusl (last bath) of Jinnah on the instructions of Miss Jin-nah. He led his namaz-e janaza (funeral prayer) in a room of the Governor General’s House at which such Shia luminaries as Yusuf Haroon, Hashim Raza and Aftab Hatim Alavi were present, while Liaquat Ali Khan, a Sunni, waited outside the room. !!

Now would you say the same about Liaquat Ali ??

It is really sad to see a lot of members trying to make desperate attempts to belittle our national hero , only because they differ with his religious beliefs !!

No wonder why Taliban can not be eradicated from a country where fake historians and pathological liars like Dr. Safdar and Orya Maqbool are respected scholars and highly educated people like Pervaiz Hoodhbhoy are considered "Jahil" ...... Where useless Mullahs are prominent figures and no one wants to acknowledge the great services of people like Dr Abdul Salam and Ch. Zafarullah !!

 

[Spring Onion]

Sir Zafarullah Khan went to attend Jinnah`s funeral . In his own words :
“So! My intention in being there was to offer the congregational prayers along with everyone else---- if I had not intended and fervently desired to pray for my leader, would it not have been more logical and make sense for me have stayed home--- and not having come to the funeral?

He did not attend the funeral , not because he wanted some Ahmedi to lead it (which was very unlikely anyways) , but because it was being led by a person who considered ahmedis to be kafir , In words of Zafarullah Khan :

“I was told that the cleric (mullah) who was to lead the prayer was none other than a person named Shabir Usmani who had used vile and abusive language against the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement.”

Now tell me that will any one offer prayers behind a person who abuses his prophet / Messiah ??

WOW so great zafrullah is offended at word kafir for qadyaniat fonder ghulam ahmed mirza and the qadyanis want us Muslims to stop taking offense over insults to our Last Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that too of the entire Muslim world.

Why Muslims should insult own prophet by bowing down to a false qadyani prophet then?

Above all it proves zafrullah was NOT above religious bias

This man (Shabbir Usmani) had declared that Shia were Kafir too , ironically he led the public funeral prayers of Jinnah ; A Shia whose coffin was transported from the Governor’s House to the burial location constantly accompanied by a black Alam (flag) on which was inscribed “Ya Hazrat-e-Abbas” !!!
. !!

There is NO room for such stupidity in Islam