What's new

Foreign policy crisis

Bang Galore

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
10,685
Reaction score
12
Country
India
Location
India
Foreign policy crisis

  • November 06, 2015

One of the most critical and persistent failures of the Nawaz Sharif government has been the deficiencies of his cabinet, both in terms of personnel and performance. Despite criticism in this regard since 2013, the government seems to be incapable of appreciating the seriousness of this shortfall and has not made any moves to change the trend of giving multiple essential portfolios to one close insider. But most ministries at least get a minister in charge and their hierarchical structures remain intact. Shockingly however, the Foreign Office (FO) remains a store without a keeper and there is a distinct diffusion of responsibility, which has resulted in Pakistan’s foreign policy being a jumbled mess lacking any central vision or cohesion. Sartaj Aziz, the octogenarian involved in the bureaucracy and foreign affairs of Pakistan for more than half a century, has been given the role of a ‘special advisor’ to the Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs and is the closest approximate of a functioning Foreign Minister. But, despite an opportunity in March to promote him to the Senate, he is not eligible to be a minister and as an advisor does not have final authority and has to contend with other such ‘special advisors’ to the prime minister.


The results of this dillydallying and a thorough lack of decisiveness in the arena of foreign policy has resulted in the continued fall of Pakistan’s influence and position internationally. The anti-India terrorism dossier shenanigans at the UN have predictably backfired and rather than winning over new allies, Pakistan seems to have lost old ones. A recent election to the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) saw Pakistan fail to muster the required votes, in what is being termed by opposition Senators as a direct result of the headless FO’s debacles. It defies good reason that Pakistan of all countries, mired in conflict and in need of a proactive policy to win favour internationally, would pursue such an ad hoc approach towards foreign policy undeterred. After Pakistan’s refusal to join the Saudi coalition waging war in Yemen, the country has lost its stock with its traditional backers in the Gulf, and their ‘no’ votes seem to have contributed to Pakistan’s failure to secure election to the HRC. And the best solution the FO can up with is to insist the Supreme Court repeal the ban on the hunting of Houbara bustards. As ever, the failings of the civilian government provide space to the military, whose chiefs are stepping in and going on foreign ‘diplomatic’ tours on their own. Pakistan can no longer afford to put off having a responsible and proactive Foreign Minister who can implement a well thought through strategic foreign policy.

Foreign policy crisis  
 
. .
The results of this dillydallying and a thorough lack of decisiveness in the arena of foreign policy has resulted in the continued fall of Pakistan’s influence and position internationally.

Everyone can see who really runs foreign and defense policy in Pakistan. Blaming the civilian government for problems with either is disingenuous.
 
.
What crisis ? If one had to choose between sending 2 divisions into Yemen and losing ME vote in UN, one would certainly chose the latter again. If that was the price we had to pay, than we are okay with it.

We might have lost some friends but we are on our way to make news ones aswell. In the last few years, our relations with eastern europe, particularly with Russia seems to be warming up. We are also expanding ties with Iran. Not to mention, we became part of the SCO. Add to that, the GSP status we got from EU. I'd say the FO has done a fine job uptil now. Sartaj Aziz may only be an advisor, but the experience he brings to the table is pivotal.
 
. .
What a misleading article.
pak is getting FDI from China+ Russia + 8 F16 and 70 mil $ from US + GSP+ from Europe.
That is all the shareholders in the world covered.
I say it's a pretty solid foreign policy.
 
. . . .
What crisis ? If one had to choose between sending 2 divisions into Yemen and losing ME vote in UN, one would certainly chose the latter again. If that was the price we had to pay, than we are okay with it.

We might have lost some friends but we are on our way to make news ones aswell. In the last few years, our relations with eastern europe, particularly with Russia seems to be warming up. We are also expanding ties with Iran. Not to mention, we became part of the SCO. Add to that, the GSP status we got from EU. I'd say the FO has done a fine job uptil now. Sartaj Aziz may only be an advisor, but the experience he brings to the table is pivotal.

I would not send 2 divisions in Yemen. Pissing off the GCC is not going to help you. Russia is a declining power. There is little Pakistan can get out of Russia at this point
 
.
I would not send 2 divisions in Yemen. Pissing off the GCC is not going to help you. Russia is a declining power. There is little Pakistan can get out of Russia at this point


Russia a declining power ? what are you smoking bro?. If anything they are increasing their influence, especially in the middle east. Even with the ruble depreciation they signed a multi billion dollar pipeline deal with Pakistan. Pissing off the GCC is much better than getting thousands killed. Btw GCC needs us more than we need them. They have no alternate to us. No other country will provide them with a nuclear umbrella.
 
.
Russia a declining power ? what are you smoking bro?. If anything they are increasing their influence, especially in the middle east. Even with the ruble depreciation they signed a multi billion dollar pipeline deal with Pakistan. Pissing off the GCC is much better than getting thousands killed. Btw GCC needs us more than we need them. They have no alternate to us. No other country will provide them with a nuclear umbrella.

Pakistan providing a nuclear umbrella for GCC? What are YOU smoking? Pakistan couldn't even be bothered to send some troops to Yemen but it's ready to provide a nuclear umbrella.

Think what you will of GCC, but they no longer trust Pakistan as they once did. In fact, Saudi Arabia will pursue its own nuclear weapons and not rely on any Pakistan nuclear umbrella.
 
.
Russia a declining power ? what are you smoking bro?. If anything they are increasing their influence, especially in the middle east. Even with the ruble depreciation they signed a multi billion dollar pipeline deal with Pakistan. Pissing off the GCC is much better than getting thousands killed. Btw GCC needs us more than we need them. They have no alternate to us. No other country will provide them with a nuclear umbrella.

russia is a declining power - population declining, falling technologically compared to leading powers

America has a pretty good military umbrella over the GCC. Ask Saddam.
Without nukes Saddam's army would kick the *** of the Pakistani army
 
.
russia is a declining power - population declining, falling technologically compared to leading powers

America has a pretty good military umbrella over the GCC. Ask Saddam.
Without nukes Saddam's army would kick the *** of the Pakistani army

The Pakistan Army is so much better than any military under Saddam Hussein's rule. Their performance in both Iraqi wars were embarrasments. At least Pakistan Army would put up a fight and not surrender en masse.
 
.
Everyone is wasting time on these 2 Dengue brothers, one is corrupt to the core and the other is stupid to the core.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom