Foreign Office indirectly confirms proof given to India

[IceCold]

Bro...this is what called "denial"....
Please read the links. I knew this would come up so I put the link which does not relate to Indian media.

What denial are you talking about? wasnt i the one who pointed the direct indirect thing out in the first place.

 

[ek_indian]

What denial are you talking about? wasnt i the one who pointed the direct indirect thing out in the first place.

It was not personal....I meant that you are alleging about some US umbrella. But shown no proofs. Therefore I called it denial that you do not want to accept that India is not having any suspected role.

 

[pakomar]

It was not personal....I meant that you are alleging about some US umbrella. But shown no proofs. Therefore I called it denial that you do not want to accept that India is not having any suspected role.

what kind of proof do you want?
what ever proof Pakistan if gave India will deny.

 

[R.A.W.]

what kind of proof do you want?
what ever proof Pakistan if gave India will deny.

Ok dont give to India. At least let the world say it. Share with them...

 

[pakomar]

Ok dont give to India. At least let the world say it. Share with them...

Share with world dose make any point the point will be if US notes it.
CIA is not sleeping they already knows Indians involvement in Pakistan. US is not interested in hearing what Pakistan proof got against Indians supporting terrorism?

 

[BATMAN]

‘I have not seen this dossier myself. If there is a dossier I am sure competent colleagues in my ministry are looking at it, and I am sure that when we have studied it we would have a suitable response.’

Typical..... idiot if you have not read it yet than shutup. Hold your comments for the day when you will be able to say 'I have read it'...
He is (recently appointed as) indian external affairs minister and i can bet he does not know the budget of india's largest foreign based operation 'RAW'.
What is the point of having him? perhaps an indian with western touch!
Pakistan also need ot appoint a man in response to the appointment of this throre guy and i recommend Zaid Hamid.

 

[Spring Onion]

why indirectly? why not directly like the Indians do it all the time. Whats keeping us at bay not to publicize.
Also the article says that both Pakistan and India make have decided not to go public over the issue however i dont buy this because India on the other hand is doing everything public and making the issue as publicize and internationalize as they could.

India sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan, alleges Rehman Malik
IANS 23 September 2009, 10:09pm IST

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Wednesday again appeared to be speaking in twin voices on improving ties with India, and accusing New Delhi of promoting
terrorism in this country.

"Yes, it is true the terrorists arrested from Swat and tribal areas of the country have confirmed Indian involvement in terrorist activities in Pakistan," online news agency quoted interior minister Rehman Malik as telling a private TV channel

India sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan, alleges Rehman Malik - Pakistan - World - NEWS - The Times of India

 

[R.A.W.]

Share with world dose make any point the point will be if US notes it.
CIA is not sleeping they already knows Indians involvement in Pakistan. US is not interested in hearing what Pakistan proof got against Indians supporting terrorism?

so what do you mean. Do you mean "India is involved because I say so"

Boss things dont work out this way in international politics.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

so what do you mean. Do you mean "India is involved because I say so"

Boss things dont work out this way in international politics.

I think the Pakistani argument is that evidence of covert Indian involvement and support for terrorists has been shared confidentially with US military and civilian leaders multiple times, and the US has refused to accept it or at least refused to openly acknowledge the validity of Pakistani concerns - the refusal to acknowledge those concerns could be due to a variety of reasons - strategic partnership, economic ties, military sales, counterweight to China etc.

As such, there is nothing to be gained by going completely public with the evidence or accusations, though you see Pakistan doing that more and more recently, since there will be no tangible impact or pressure on India to stop that intervention unless the US publicly recognizes Pakistani concerns as valid and agrees to pressure India in Afghanistan.

There have however been some signs of the US trying to accommodate Pakistani concerns indirectly as shown in the followin threads:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...ence-afghanistan-could-harm-us-interests.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/strate...wants-india-scale-back-afghan-operations.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/strate...-asks-india-close-consulates-afghanistan.html

 

[PAFAce]

May be because you don't have the proofs. Apart from media speculations, there were no words from GoP in the beginning. Later we have some inputs that no such dossier exists (read my link). But yes, there are statements from Indian authorities which says that "no such proof is given to them".

Define proof. Confessions from top Taleban commanders, isn't that proof? American politician(s) openly requesting India to reduce its influence and continued activities in Afghanistan, isn't that proof? Or do you really believe that the Indian government has spent 1.2 Billion dollars in Afghanistan (some would say paid-off the illegal Afghan government) because they're great humanitarians? I hope you're not that naive. Even the most hardcore Indian must smell something funny here, it's only natural.

Come on. We could go back and forth all day, but you've already made up your mind, so there's no point arguing. If I had a nickel for every Indian who would mindlessly deny any Indian involvement in Pakistan, without any proof, I'd be a millionaire. Anything they say will be based purely on nationalism and not contain an ounce of rational thought, which is why the smart Indians on this forum stay away from such debates. It's best to get off this subject, and stick to the topic.

 

[R.A.W.]

Define proof. Confessions from top Taleban commanders, isn't that proof? American politician(s) openly requesting India to reduce its influence and continued activities in Afghanistan, isn't that proof? Or do you really believe that the Indian government has spent 1.2 Billion dollars in Afghanistan (some would say paid-off the illegal Afghan government) because they're great humanitarians? I hope you're not that naive. Even the most hardcore Indian must smell something funny here, it's only natural.

Come on. We could go back and forth all day, but you've already made up your mind, so there's no point arguing. If I had a nickel for every Indian who would mindlessly deny any Indian involvement in Pakistan, without any proof, I'd be a millionaire. Anything they say will be based purely on nationalism and not contain an ounce of rational thought, which is why the smart Indians on this forum stay away from such debates. It's best to get off this subject, and stick to the topic.

We have 100 confessions here about Pakistan and ISI directly being involved in killing people within India.

Well why you guys dont go for UN then and present over there. Get India declared a terrorist state. what stops you? Did Indians said no dont do that. We are openly saying these are the proofs and Pakistani nationals were involved. Why are you hiding behind the cushion like a cat.