Okay so one incident where soldiers were massacred was deemed important by the govt hence brought into the public domain and other similar incidents were not made public because no one survived in those incidents and govt may have thought they could have vanished in thin air or defected to China, I see the great high Chinese IQ at work here. The govt's POV is pure propaganda when the tribals received an unarmed delegation that was sent after the incident warmly , while you want others to believe your narrative as true . Care to explain what was stopping the tribals to attack them the second time if they considered them trespassers?
So everything was so hunky dory among AP tribes and there was no intertribal rivalries, and one tribe trespassing into other's area would not be considered encroachment because of same ethnicity. Good to know.
Maybe be I missed your narrative on locals supporting the Chinese in 62 war. Plz share the link of the post/thread, I'd give it a read. I never said that it was not possible, there must have been some like you back then too, i'm just interested in the extent of support for both sides.I've never questioned anyone's nationality, I just don't care whose payroll one is. I can understand some people do have this trait of selling themselves to the highest bidder , but the fact that even members on this forum from your state contradict your claims doesn't help your case. You offer nothing to substantiate yourself other than rhetoric. Your personal opinion has no weight unless it is the opinion of the masses . Your 'we will chose China ' is more like ' I will chose China' which is understandable considering your loyalty for your masters.
Sigh,such naivety on display.How did the government know of achingmori?From the account of the lone soldier who survived.If he hadn't,this incident too would have been forgotten.Indian soldiers were always attacked,pre 47 and post 47.After the british left in 47,many incidents happened against Indians,heck,even the peacefu lapatanis couldn't tolerate Indians and launched attacks which resulted in 2 of their villages being burned down.
Your ignorance of the nuances of the people are further ignored by your comment on how being of the same ethnicity didn't matter when entering someone else's territory.The tribes took action only when someone entered their territory with view of capturing it or conducting economic activities that didn't benefit them as well.As long as one was a harmless person,the people would view the said individual with concern and suspicion but never take the trouble of outright attacking them.If the people killed everyone who came into their territories,the tibetans from lhasa wouldn't have taken pilgrimages in the territory of south tibet for centuries,nor traders from tibet or south china ever come for trading or more recently,various missionaries as early as mid 19th century come in and stay with the tribes.
Let's accept your racist narrative that the natives,tagins,killed them because of the abors as abors were encroaching on tagin territory,supposedly.Then why did the tagins kill the Indians when the source of their anger was the abors?Why were the Indians not seen as outsiders encroaching when the Indians were,forget ethnicity,were not even part of the same race as the tagins.Why attack Indian soldiers armed with modern firearms when the supposedly porters of abor tribe were carrying none.Wouldn't it be better to just target the abors?
So you wish to tell me that their unarmed cousins were seen as a threat but the armed Indians were seen as angels?You know somehow your line of reasoning doesn't make sense.
Unlike you Indians,we don't kill each other for petty reasons like caste,religion etc.We have no riots here because we are cohesive as a society and between tribes.Something unimaginable for you Indians I guess.
As I said before,the narrative of "Savage,backward,tribesmen who kill everybody not of their clan and tribe" logic perpetuated by the establishment to dismiss off the achingmori incident is just a very clever play on the racist views of Indians about the people here.
I have written volumes on this forum about the local support to PLA,not my fault if you are too lazy to read them.How would the chinese ever "Pay" someone in the region when they themselves struggles to just properly supply their armies?
And as we are talking of proof,may you present your own proof that we never supported the PLA and China?After all,the burden of proof rests on both sides making claims and I have offered aplenty during my more than half a year stay on this forum.
.Keep telling that to yourself Mr.Chinese false flagger
!!
