What's new

For the Larger Navy U.S. Needs, American Shipping and Shipbuilding Must Be Revived

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

For the Larger Navy U.S. Needs, American Shipping and Shipbuilding Must Be Revived​

Oct 27, 2022

With the Navy’s eyes set on achieving a goal well above Congress’ mandated 355 manned warships, the American shipbuilding industry has a lot of work to do. Unfortunately, the industry’s current state doesn’t offer much hope for meeting those goals, let alone sustaining a modestly larger fleet.

In a 2021 report on U.S. defense supply chains, The Heritage Foundation’s Maiya Clark explained what is called a “Fragility and Criticality” assessment. That’s a tool used by the Department of Defense to identify and mitigate weaknesses in the defense industrial base.

Fragility can be understood as how likely disruption is to a certain “product or service,” while criticality indicates how difficult it would be to replace the item.

Applying that tool to U.S. Navy shipbuilding reveals that America is a far cry from its former status as a major shipbuilder.

Let’s briefly examine three metrics:

1) Foreign Dependency

Foreign sources provide the U.S. maritime industrial base with strategic materials critical to constructing vessels, such as precision machine tools, aluminum, and microelectronics. In 2020, China was the third-largest source of microelectronics for the U.S., and in 2021 was the second-largest source of aluminum for the U.S.

Regarding precision machine tools, the theme continues: In 2021, by a wide margin, China topped the charts of machine tools production. It’s concerning that America’s top strategic competitor consistently appears to have a presence in vital supply chains.

2) Too Few U.S. Firms

Since the 1970s, 14 “defense-related shipyards” have shut down, and only one new shipyard has opened. And all the firms still in the shipbuilding sector have dwindled into an oligopoly serving virtually one customer, the U.S. Navy.

To make matters worse, the seven shipyards constructing large and deep-draft ships are only responding to specific ship requirements of the Navy and Coast Guard. As such, shipbuilders are encouraged to service a limited market—exacerbated by the Jones Act, a 100-year-old law intended to ensure the nation has a minimum shipping capacity.

That has distorted the sector into uncompletedness and the death of American shipping. In August, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday recognized the Navy’s contribution to this slow death of American shipbuilding by not providing any shipbuilding predictability and spoke of the need to give industry a “clear aim point” of needs with a “higher degree of confidence” going forward.

3) Too Few Merchant Marines, Shipyard Workers

Finally, a major challenge of the shipbuilding industry is attracting, training, and retaining skilled labor.

Earlier this year, a manager for a major U.S. shipbuilder emphasized that the labor shortage is the shipbuilding company’s “biggest challenge.” Often, there are not enough workers to replace those who are retiring, and the industry is failing to attract new, young employees.

The Department of Defense recognizes that problem, too. In response to the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, the Pentagon released a report stating that the shipbuilding “industrial base today lacks the resiliency and bench strength to meet required demand” and stressed the need for long-term, prioritized workforce investments.

The supply of mariners is inadequate, too. If a “sustained crisis” were to occur, the number of required U.S. mariners (whose average age is 46) would fall short by 15%.

For too long, the nation has tried to build the Navy needed while neglecting the fundamentals for building and sustaining it. The result is obvious: namely, too few ships and shipyards unable to meet demand.

To those familiar with Alfred Thayer Mahan’s famous maritime writing, it’s no surprise that without a vibrant competitive shipping and shipbuilding industry, the Navy withers.

To effectively compete with China, the nation needs a larger Navy, and to do so American shipping and shipbuilding must be revived. To do this, America must once again be globally competitive, achieved by leveraging novel technologies that address obvious supply chain weaknesses. Such innovation speaks to American strengths.

Getting there requires using a market bridge; that is, developing revolutionary shipping and shipbuilding to meet urgent military logistic needs with commercial utility. Examples include solving the Navy’s operational challenges with weapons reloading at sea, small modular nuclear reactors for vessel propulsion, and unmanned shipping.

Already, additive manufacturing is being embraced with the Department of Defense’s road map, as well as commercial sectors to alleviate delivery delays, reduce costs, and reduce capital investments for transportation.

And the global delivery drone services market was expected to grow from $2.37 billion in 2021 to $3.49 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach $18.77 billion in 2026. These are just two of several key promising technologies, which if synchronized, can restore American global competitiveness in shipping.

What Impact Will It Have?

Returning to our roots as a maritime nation and asserting the necessary innovations to do so in the modern era will be pivotal to American security and prosperity.

If done well, fostering an American revolution in shipping can energize a lethargic industrial sector critical to the nation’s defense and sustain a wartime economy. As such, a stronger and globally competitive maritime sector serves as a deterrent against Chinese economic coercion and military adventures, which could result in a long war over Taiwan.

 
.
It's not possible. US workforce are too expensive, lazy and efficient. Even Elon Musk gives up and build mega factory in China.
 
.
It's not possible. US workforce are too expensive, lazy and efficient. Even Elon Musk gives up and build mega factory in China.
US has been calling for bringing manufacturing back for at least 4 decades since 1980's, it's the slogan of all the condidates of every election.
 
.
US has been calling for bringing manufacturing back for at least 4 decades since 1980's, it's the slogan of all the condidates of every election.
USA is doomed. Before they even start a war with China, I think they will bankrupt too. They are following the footpath of Soviet Union.
 
.
It's not possible. US workforce are too expensive, lazy and efficient. Even Elon Musk gives up and build mega factory in China.

He built a factory because China had tariffs on car imports.


Typically, foreign car makers who hope to sell to China have two options, both of which come with drawbacks. Companies hoping to make cars inside China must form a joint-venture with a domestic car maker, typically a state-owned enterprise, that grants the local partner a 51% majority stake and a corresponding share of profits. Manufacturing domestically in theory lets a foreign company enjoy lower labor and logistics costs, but also raises concern over intellectual property since it must partner with a local manufacturer who happens to be producing vehicles of its own.

Still, many foreign automakers pursue this route—GM has a joint venture with Shanghai’s SAIC Motor Corp, and Ford has one with Chongqing-based Changan automotive.

The alternative is to import cars to China. But the government imposes a steep 25% tax on all imported vehicles—making them prohibitively expensive for some cost-sensitive consumers.
 
Last edited:
.
He built a factory because China had tariffs on car imports.
Stop delude yourself. Then why did from Shanghai factory, it exported so many Tesla cars?
Nice cheapshot from you to hide US embarrassment. The feeling imponent must have hurt you badly. :lol:
 
.
Stop delude yourself. Then why did from Shanghai factory, it exported so many Tesla cars?

Because world demand is now so crazy the US factories can't keep up with it.

Oct 3, 2022
So far this year, Tesla produced and delivered more than 900,000 electric cars

Tesla Model Y Europe’s best-selling car in September​

 
Last edited:
.
Because world demand is now so crazy the US factories can't keep up with it.

Oct 3, 2022
So far this year, Tesla produced and delivered more than 900,000 electric cars

Tesla Model Y Europe’s best-selling car in September​

First Japan, and now China, manufacturing won't go back to US and US doesn't have enough skilled workforce to take on those jobs. this is a hard fact.
 
.
First Japan, and now China, manufacturing won't go back to US and US doesn't have enough skilled workforce to take on those jobs. this is a hard fact.

Tesla just opened 2 new factories in Berlin and Austin this year.

Unfortunately Tesla has achieved such a level of success that demand has far outstripped supply. Even 4 factories isn't enough.
 
. .
I m talking about the whole manufacturing industry, it won't go back to US and US won't be able to revive its shipbuilding industry, it's too late by now.

This is about warships. We aren't going to outsource that. Plus the US was never a big commercial shipbuilding country..other than during WW2.
 
.
And the best way is to maake Europe buy from US only.
 
.
This is about warships. We aren't going to outsource that. Plus the US was never a big commercial shipbuilding country..other than during WW2.
War ship building for sustainable long term growth depends on a country's overall shipbuilding industry. this is why China can outbuild every navy on the planet now.
 
.
US has been calling for bringing manufacturing back for at least 4 decades since 1980's, it's the slogan of all the condidates of every election.

that is not possible and the americans know it.
They can't even compete with india , on a dollar to dollar basis.

Chinese economy is not just cheaper and efficient,
it is designed perfectly.
for example, to make a car, you need A, B, C , D and E.
you will get multiple factories in china, who can offer each one of the components that too on very flexible terms.

This cannot be matched elsewhere.
 
.
Because world demand is now so crazy the US factories can't keep up with it.
Then why didn't Tesla build more factories in US but instead in China? I know you are trying hard to avoid the point raise that US worker are lazy and ill efficient while cost even more to hire compare to China.

Be a man and admit it. You think by just acting ignorant , other readers wouldn't know the truth? :enjoy:

Tesla just opened 2 new factories in Berlin and Austin this year.

Unfortunately Tesla has achieved such a level of success that demand has far outstripped supply. Even 4 factories isn't enough.
But it not gonna replace the mighty one in Shanghai. Shanghai production equal to more than 50% combine of all Tesla car.
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom