Chak Bamu
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 5,361
- Reaction score
- 69
- Country
- Location
You are either lying, living under a stone for long, or just plain stupid. How can I grapple with any of these?Care to share some of those counter arguments and enlighten us Insafis?
Everyone says there are “arguments” but no one says what those arguments are.
Were you born yesterday? I am not wasting my time on someone like you. Stay locked in your bubble.
That is why I much prefer Parliamentary system over the Presidential one. Pakistan is a multi-ethnic country & it can not afford a Presidential system when one ethnicity is in majority. Fools do not understand this & keep harping for the presidential system.Thats is right that both Erdogan and Putin is a good leaders for their first 10-15 years rule. This is why we should not support authoritarian regime and limit our President period into just 10-15 years.
Indonesia limit the amount of time an individual can rule our country because we know both Soekarno and Soeharto were exelen leaders in their 10-15 years rule, but become the reason of Indonesian economic down fall during the time their rule has exceeded that limit.
For parliament system under a democratic regime some how the negative effect can be mitigated like the way Margaret Teacher and Angele Merkel lead both Britain and German quite long.
Presidential system does give huge control to leaders compared to parliament system, it has both good and bad side. President system negative side should be eliminated by limiting how long an individual can be a President.