No I dont hold grudges
You actually said that to that...Your reply was along the lines of an example of a business model....Governance vs business...Like NS you treat Pakistan as a business.....
All I had said was if NS likes to take credit of positives he should EQUALLY take blames for the wrongs....
You do know everyone blames Zia or Zardari....Everyone points at Bush admin or Obama if something goes wrong...But NS does not take a single blame only wants praises ...Kindly explain that bit....Also put the cherry on the top for NS's opinion on Saudi Arabia and Yemen issue...
I hope your memory is clear now!
As per your grammar nazi habits: Extortion and malnutrition
Does he want to take blame that would be noble though the only thing close to noble about him is the Shareef in his name...
Hope is not even in the same category of reality....
First of all, Obama is not blamed for failure of state governments (high crime, illiteracy and so forth). But of course you have no clue of what you speak of. Hell, you don't even believe in the constitution of Pakistan, because your "feelings" triumph constitution (which is, the federation is responsible for matters that fall under provincial gov't per constitution). Oh and I brought business as an example, which was big business isn't responsible to look after smaller business (and you said it was! HA!). It had nothing to do with Nawaz. I guess your memory is weak.
Zardari is blamed for the mess he is responsible for, example being Sindh, Federation, KP and Balochistan. He is not held responsible for Punjab, for PML-N was ruling there. Having said that, Nawaz does not take credit for "Sehat-ka-insaaf" or other good stuff PTI does. So he isn't responsible for the bad governance of PTI there.
Gee, I gave you some links, but guess you didn't read them. It's one thing being not knowing something, it's another refusing to learn something. As it is said, Abu Jahil got his name because, he believed in Islam, but refused to accept it. If only you spent sometime actually reading books about the matters than waste time posting with empty references.
So please practice what you preach. If you are going to talk about realities to others, make sure you're familiar with realities (I.e. constitution of Pakistan).
Oh and you equally have grammar problems, but far more than I. It's funny you've to mention a few of mine. I guess I got you too embarrassed of yourself. It's ok, you can use many applications to improve your grammar online. How about this, write your post out in Microsoft word, it'll help you fix your mistakes and hen simply copy and paste that comment. Like that?
What are your thoughts just tell me because I really Want to know how Realist thinks about NA 246 Election.
The so-called "realist" thinks that PTI will bring tsunami in NA 246. They will change Pakistan forever. The change I see, KPK is going to hell and God forbid, if NA 246 falls under PTI, then bye bye to NA 246 as well.
Just take a look around, PTI won't resign for parliament (lets ignore the nonsense that they've tendered resignation because they won't confirm it in person), so their constituency is not represented at the assembly. Yet they continue to get paid and enjoy all perks.
I don't know who will win it, but one thing is for sure. If PTI loses "Dhandli, worst election in mankind history, Nawaz responsible and helped by RAW." And if PTI wins, "never has there been more clean elections in mankind history."