What's new

First Type 06361 submarine Hà Ni spotted in Svetly, Kaliningrad region, Ru

Sorry, but I better believe Kommersant that you:)

We have J-20 and J-31, why would we need the inferior Su-35?

Same logic for the S-400 SAM, since we already possess the KKV technology (much more reliable than the US version). Intercepting an aircraft is nothing compared to the interception against an ICBM or satellite.

We possess the much superior technology, but we do understand that Russia needs us to make some ads for their weapons. :coffee:
 
.
We have J-20 and J-31, why would we need the inferior Su-35?

Same logic for the S-400 SAM, since we already possess the KKV technology (much more reliable than the US version). Intercepting an aircraft is nothing compared to the interception against an ICBM or satellite.

We possess the much superior technology, but we do understand that Russia needs us to make some ads for their weapons. :coffee:

You don't need Su35, you need J 35:)
What much superior technologies do you mean?

since we already possess the KKV technology (much more reliable than the US version)
Well it can not be true even in theory:)
US owns several hundred critical technologies that the rest of the world doesn't own.
 
.
You don't need Su35, you need J 35:)
What much superior technologies do you mean?

You need to sell your weapons like Su-35 and S-400, so you are making the ads like China is going to buy your weapons.

But we are making some really frightening weapons, have you heard of this guy? We just tested it few days ago.

Dong Neng-2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The US media always made the big headline news about North Korea's weak puny warhead, yet they avoid talking any subject about China's KKV/MKV technology. Because they know who they are really afraid of and it is going to make them sh!t their pant.
 
.
You need to sell your weapons like Su-35 and S-400, so you are making the ads like China is going to buy your weapons.

But we are making some really frightening weapons, have you heard of this guy? We just tested it few days ago.

Dong Neng-2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

US media always made the big headline hype about North Korea's weak puny warhead, yet they avoid talking any subject about China's KKV/MKV technology. Because they know who they are really afraid of and it is going to make them sh!t their pant.

The fact that we need to sell Su35 etc doesn't mean that you don't really want to buy it.
Regarding Dong Neng 2, it's cool, but why it is more relyable that US analogs? You need to see the common technological level in US and CHina.

And I think you will never make rapid movements against US, because you as export oriented economy deeply depend on US and its allies in Europe.
 
.
We have J-20 and J-31, why would we need the inferior Su-35?

Same logic for the S-400 SAM, since we already possess the KKV technology (much more reliable than the US version). Intercepting an aircraft is nothing compared to the interception against an ICBM or satellite.

We possess the much superior technology, but we do understand that Russia needs us to make some ads for their weapons. :coffee:

So when you plan to induct the jet fighters J-20 and J-31? Chinese are really arrogant nowadays.
 
.
Regarding Dong Neng 2, it's cool, but why it is more relyable that US analogs? You need to see the common technological level in US and CHina.

And I think you will never make rapid movements against US, because you as export oriented economy deeply depend on US and its allies in Europe.

Of course, it is far more reliable, our successful times is two, while US is one, while our successful rate is 100%, while US is only 25%.

Because that anti-missile technology is a new field that US hasn't started off the program much earlier than China, USA only has the technological advantage on the traditional fields like jet engine and gas turbine.

We are making the weapon that US is dreaming to pursue it for many decades, if US wants to have it, then it is nothing wrong that we possess it now.

An economic warfare? Have you seen the economic shape of Europe for now? Can they afford to play with us? :coffee:
 
.
Back to topic: hopefully Vietnam Navy continues increasing its strength by more modern subs such as this Amur class:

Amur_Rubin.jpg
 
. .
Of course, it is far more reliable, our successful times is two, while US is one, while our successful rate is 100%, while US is only 25%.

Because that anti-missile technology is a new field that US hasn't started off the program much earlier than China, USA only has the technological advantage on the traditional fields like jet engine and gas turbine.

We are making the weapon that US is dreaming to pursue it for many decades, if US wants to have it, then it is nothing wrong that we possess it now.

An economic warfare? Have you seen the economic shape of Europe for now? Can they afford to play with us? :coffee:

You believe what you say regarding antisatellite weaponry in context of US?:)

Regarding Europe and the US, once they take the orders, investments technologies and equipment off China what happens to China next month?

J-20 engine is WS-10G, nothing in common with AL-31F.

WS-10G

207qil4.jpg



AL-31F

images

Looks similar:)
 
.
You belive what you say regarding antisatellite weaponry?:)

Regarding Europe and the US, once they take the orders, investments technologies and equipment off China what happens to China next month?

Then go ahead, find another replacement of China.

China's wage is already much higher than many other developing countries, yet why most of the manufacturing jobs still staying in China?

Do you truly believe it is about the cheap labor cost? We have the infracture to sustain the manufacturing base, that's why other developing nations can never compete with us.

Meanwhile China is not only relying on foreign investment, we are also farming our own global corporations.

13 Chinese Companies Going Global In 2013 - Forbes

Looks similar:)

Yep, they are all turbofan engine with a 3D TVC nozzle, that's it.

Because a person has two arms and two legs same as you, it doesn't mean that person is a ripoff of yours. :coffee:
 
.
Then go ahead, find another replacement of China.

China's wage is already much higher than many other developing countries, yet why most of the manufacturing jobs still staying in China?

Do you truly believe it is about the cheap labor cost? We have the infracture to sustain the manufacturing base, that's why other developing nations can never compete with us.

Meanwhile China is not only relying on foreign investment, we are also farming our own global corporations.

13 Chinese Companies Going Global In 2013 - Forbes

Yes!!! And this is because China's authorities don't make rapid movements or even talk about such movements.
It always take two in economical cooperation. If one looks dangerous...:)
Agree about global CN companies.
But high technologies are not in your possession.

P.S. I get very good baby clothes from US. Almost everything is Thai or Vietnamese made:)
 
. .
Intel's processor research and development activity is very high tech:)
Your supercomputer made of US processors, you just combine plenty of them.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom