What's new

First Photos of Destroyed Leopard and Bradley’s, confirmed

. .
Having an explosion DOES NOT EQUATE to the thing is destroy

Again, it's OPEN KNOWLEDGE that the payload for a Lancet is just 6 Kgs (that's warhead + component + fuel) and the warhead alone is just 3KG.

a M888 60 mm mortar warhead is 2kg, 40mm grenade have a warhead of 2Kg, M821 81mm mortar round have a warhead of 4.1 kg HE/PETN. All of those cannot destroy an armour target, you are saying somehow Russian explosive are more powerful than the west.

Bear in mind, tradition armour piercing AT missile have twice or three times the size of Lancet warhead. Older AGM-114 have an 8KG warhead, and TOW2 have a 6.14kg warhead that can penetrate 900mm ERA.

View attachment 941454

But yes, I am trolling, and Russian explosive is 3 times more effective than Western Warhead. :lol: :lol:

ok so thats even worse you are admitting only a 3kg warhead is killing the leopards and Bradley

so you are confirming lancet is even more deadly than I am portraying it
 
.
ok so thats even worse you are admitting only a 3kg warhead is killing the leopards and Bradley

so you are confirming lancet is even more deadly than I am portraying it
No, he is telling you a the Lancet operator needs a lot of luck to take out a functioning MBT or IFV.
I believe you are one of those claiming Russia is producing thousends of these per month, yet only a few evidently succeed judging by the footage provided.
 
.
now we know why Americans didn’t want to send M1 into the front line even although they have over 3,500 in storage and only 31 sent to Ukraine which are held in reserve

They want to retain their Hollywood style reputation of killing only civilians and it would be a total PR disaster and it would under mine American equipment

Germans were fooled

Why would we worry about that? There are destroyed Abrams in Iraq during the 2003 invasion as well as by Iraqi Army when they had their own Abrams. You don't make sense. The only reason the U.S. was hesitant about sending Abrams because of the logistics of having so many different tanks especially a tank built from thousands of miles away. Leopards are more logical choice since they can be repaired and maintained close to home.
 
.
No, he is telling you a the Lancet operator needs a lot of luck to take out a functioning MBT or IFV.
I believe you are one of those claiming Russia is producing thousends of these per month, yet only a few evidently succeed judging by the footage provided.


which means Russia has not only weapons on their side but also luck !

thanks for confirming

Why would we worry about that? There are destroyed Abrams in Iraq during the 2003 invasion as well as by Iraqi Army when they had their own Abrams. You don't make sense.

but not in the numbers they would get from facing Russia in Ukraine like Leo

and also getting a a$$ whopping from Russia will be a big PR disaster
 
. .
but not in the numbers they would get from facing Russia in Ukraine like Leo

and also getting a a$$ whopping from Russia will be a big PR disaster
Wouldn't matter since that's on Ukraine's ability to deal with it, not the U.S. Army. I mean the Russians already have their own problems with their own tanks. Couldn't even spare 1 modern tank in their parade recently.
 
.
Last edited:
.
ok so thats even worse you are admitting only a 3kg warhead is killing the leopards and Bradley

so you are confirming lancet is even more deadly than I am portraying it
If Russia record EVERY EXPLOSION as a kill, then no wonder Russia claim they destroyed 1234 Ukrainian Tanks and 90 HIMARS.

Com'on, at least tell me you are not that stupid.
 
.
Lancet 3 and why is it so successful

basically its a flying anti tank missile

and Leo 2A6 is no joke of a tank its is one of the most advanced tanks in the World


It's really something the usage the Russians are getting out of these lancet 3s. The effectiveness of its destruction capacity seems to vary from target to target yet it's undeniable how it seems to be a game changer if just by the fear factor it creates, regardless of the armored or mechanized vehicle or even howitzer damage level it causes.

Despite loitering munitions in the form of kamikaze drones -- whether released from aircraft or from simple metal platforms like these lancets -- wreak havoc among personnel more so than the platform damage they create. I think the psychological factor is huge, especially when there doesn't seem to be any defensive system to counter it.
 
.
If Russia record EVERY EXPLOSION as a kill, then no wonder Russia claim they destroyed 1234 Ukrainian Tanks and 90 HIMARS.

Com'on, at least tell me you are not that stupid.

Oh coming from a conscript who just so claims to have served in military

I know the type very well clearly not clever enough to make it up the ladder so dropped and now trolling forums

No education no job no future
 
.
Oh coming from a conscript who just so claims to have served in military

I know the type very well clearly not clever enough to make it up the ladder so dropped and now trolling forums

No education no job no future
Well, there are no conscription in the US. It's a volunteer force. And I would say even a conscript know this stuff more than you. Do you even know which end the bullet comes out LOL? A conscript would know..:lol::lol::lol:
 
.
Well, there are no conscription in the US. It's a volunteer force. And I would say even a conscript know this stuff more than you. Do you even know which end the bullet comes out LOL? A conscript would know..:lol::lol::lol:

No I am not a loser I don’t serve to please others I am not a slave I live a good life no need for me to wear a veterans badge and beg for free hand outs like you

You guys are thick as they come school drop out
 
.
Soft-Warning
No I am not a loser I don’t serve to please others I am not a slave I live a good life no need for me to wear a veterans badge and beg for free hand outs like you

You guys are thick as they come school drop out
Well all I can say is you are too successful to becoming an arsehole. That's probably the only thing you are really good at. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom