First Defence.pk post reference from WIKIPEDIA

[jhungary]

On my casual strolling on Wikipedia. I found this

Research and Analysis Wing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Which the article reference on a post from defence.pk

RAW & IB's biggest anti-terror covert ops abroad

look like someone finally make this site mainstream

Congrat

@Slav Defence @WebMaster @levina @Nihonjin1051

 

[kṣamā]

Wasn't Wiki a non trusted source? So when they refer to us doesn't that also make us untrusted??

Anyways good to know our forum is getting recognition.

 

[jhungary]

Wasn't Wiki a non trusted source? So when they refer to us doesn't that also make us untrusted??

Anyways good to know our forum is getting recognition.

My guess is, it's not about trusted or not, but as a sign this forum have gone mainstream...

 

[Ragnar]

Were you researching on RAW- ISIS links? It has been well documented on twitter.

 

[21 Dec 2012]

Anybody can add any reference in any Wikipedia article. It may have survived the mods but that doesn't mean much. The original article wasn't a Defence.pk production but just another third party copy-paste. I don't see how that makes PDF 'mainstream'.

 

[Dubious]

On my casual strolling on Wikipedia. I found this

View attachment 259453

Research and Analysis Wing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Which the article reference on a post from defence.pk

RAW & IB's biggest anti-terror covert ops abroad

look like someone finally make this site mainstream

Congrat

@Slav Defence @WebMaster @levina @Nihonjin1051

Shouldnt that be reason for concern?

Esp the no. of trolls spewing crap in the name of facts...

And if you click on the link (on defence.pk) it is from Home

Which isnt even showing the story anymore....How reliable is that?

My guess is, it's not about trusted or not, but as a sign this forum have gone mainstream...

Mainstream with lies and fabrications formed from delusions?

 

[Indos]

I hope my posts here can be reference as well for Wikipedia. ^ ^

 

[21 Dec 2012]

I hope my posts here can be reference as well for Wikipedia. ^ ^

They will. In the following articles.
Narcissism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Narcissistic personality disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[SipahSalar]

When someone will use that reference as a reference on PDF not knowing that reference is itself a reference based on PDF.

 

[Archie]

When someone will use that reference as a reference on PDF not knowing that reference is itself a reference based on PDF.

That's like Schroedinger's Cat

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

Screw wikipedia.

 

[Levina]

Which the article reference on a post from defence.pk

RAW & IB's biggest anti-terror covert ops abroad

look like someone finally make this site mainstream

Congrat

@Slav Defence @WebMaster @levina @Nihonjin1051

Thanks for the tag!!!
I must say that members like you, @AUSTERLITZ , @scorpionx @vostok @Arsalan and many other members (whom I follow) have contributed to this forum with some high quality posts.
It's time forum etiquette is followed by everyone, and mods prevent trolls and duplicate ids from degrading the quality of posts on this forum.

All the best to PDF team!

@Side-Winder , you deserve a mention here for I know you have worked behind the scenes on PDF's social media account.

 

[Kompromat]

Happens regularly. Defence.pk now appears in book sources too.

 

[EagleEyes]

We have been to CNN so this is not a big deal.

 

[Slav Defence]

We have been to CNN so this is not a big deal.

where?can you post screenshots?

regards