What's new

first arjun now this, another catatrophy from DRDO

.
As I said, in another Thread The Biggest issue for Pakistan :

THEY CELEBRATE INDIAN FIALURES ... More Than ... PLANNING THEIR OWN SUCCESS.

PS : The Day Pakistan Evene Designs ANY ONE OF THESE , You Can Bash DRDO :

- An ICBM ( Agni V , Inducted )
- An SLBM ( K 4 , 4+ Sucess Trials , under Induction )
- A Boomer ( INS Arhihant , Trials on )
- A Carrier ( INS Vikrant , Final Phase )
- A Hypersonic Missile ( Brahmos , Inducted)
- An ABM ( PAD / AAD , Under Induction of 2K range )
- A QBM ( Shaurya Missile , Inducted )
- A SAM ( Akash , Inducted )
- An AAM ( Astra , Under Trails )
- Naval Fighter ( NLCA , On Order )
- Supersonic Missile Killer SAM ( Barak 8 , Inducted )

And the list goes on and On and On..... ( The Above is the LIST OF ONLY SUCCESSFUL PROJECTS )

Thing is, we only develop stuff that we need.

Showing two as examples... few Indian companies now also makes AESA T/R modules.

This AESA TAKES PICTURES FROM SPACE.... :D
sat5.jpg

DRDO AEW...
kakcax.jpg


Also there are many AESA projects like the large X band AESA developed for Missile tracking ship.




At the end its all about aid... :lol: Free of cost...

Turkey to provide 34 T-37 aircraft to Pakistan free of cost - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

Its not aid, Pakistan never asked for T-37 aircraft; our allies give us equipment all the time, free of charge and as a good gesture not "aid".
 
.
That article is written by a well known DRDO baiter. DRDO has developed many technologies like AWACS, missile defence, tanks, laser, etc. Now you are not in a position to talk about India. Tell me a single weapon that does not have a copy in china dn north korea.

Its burn more of the arses of the few pakistanis here anything else than Modi and DRDO? Think why!!!

OP, more than 120 Arjun are in service unlike Chinese mbt-2000 given as aid. And more than 500 are on order.


BO5%2BK15%2Bb-781714.jpg

kakcax.jpg

1391029164-1391018862400.jpg

B-IUUyICYAAjxRU.jpg


Aditya%2BBeam%2BDelivery%2BSystem.jpg

18rocket5.jpg

GSAT-7.JPG

INS_Kolkata.jpg


Tell me, if your country even close to developing any of these? Sorry, you don't have even a good university or r&d centre. Made in China doesn't help always.

It doesnt matter what you develope or how much you develope; they are still sht compared to anything we or the world has.
 
.
Mmmmm, very subtle trolling?? This design is not inspired by the Chinese nor is it copied from Pakistan. This design (and the Chinese and pak designs) are inspired by Rutan_Long-EZ a design created by Burt Rutan.

Don't bother going in any more in depth details if all you intend is to troll.
i said the designs are similar not the same besides i do have a valid point
 
.
i said the designs are similar not the same besides i do have a valid point

You exact words were "india is copying Pakistan". Big difference. You have been long enough on this forum to know that saying india copied from Pakistan or Pakistan copied from india is akin to blasphemy on this forum. Neither country has copied the other and never will. They will have ( already have) programs inspired by the same design by a different country but never each other's.
 
.
They are not mocking the people who are making these ingenious machines, rather the fact that despite all their DRDO and india bashing, the best any in their country can come up with is this. They don't have the right to poke fun at our achievements when they have not come close to what we have done on our own.
true no one has the right to mock your indigenous machines. granted. but what there are doing is mocking drdo's failures
Edit: this is not the norm for Pakistani citizens to make their own copters, it's the passion of some ingenious people. You will find such people in all the countries. Please don't hype it up as something you see in every Pakistani. Not that I am taking away anything from their achievement, rather the opposite, these people are few and rare, and frankly should be given more attention by their government/scientific community.

i should have said it like that

You exact words were "india is copying Pakistan". Big difference. You have been long enough on this forum to know that saying india copied from Pakistan or Pakistan copied from india is akin to blasphemy on this forum. Neither country has copied the other and never will. They will have ( already have) programs inspired by the same design by a different country but never each other's.
thats a slight bit of troll in me which i had to get out, but i do hold a point in the design similarities.
 
.
true no one has the right to mock your indigenous machines. granted. but what there are doing is mocking drdo's failures


i should have said it like that


Agreed on the second point.
As for your first statement my issue with these DRDO Hal bashers is not on their criticism of failed products, rather their selective reading, ignoring all the successes of our design agencies and claiming the agencies themselves to be failures. That is the same feeling for a lot of posters who bring up the images of home made pak copters. Those pictures are just the Indian posters replying in kind to trolls.
Although I Agree it is childish and unwarranted. But you can't have only mature posts on the Internet. Thinking such is itself very childish, no? ( bunch of smileys to tone down the somberness of my post, but cannot find the smileys on mobile version lol :) )
 
.
hold up that rustom looks just like a ch-3/ burraq. so its pakistan taking influence from china where india is coppying pakistan. it looks very similar to the buraq
212919m77775ta70190z16.jpg

the differance is the flir on the buraq is bigger where as the rustom is smaller. and the rustom has a spinal communications trancever/reciver where as the burraq has its communications in the foward compartmnet, hences explaing the slight bulge on the top foward compartment of the ucav.

i would go more indepth but im on the road right now

Here is NAL's LCRA (which was Rutan's design & this project was technical base for Rustom 1
PlanespottersNet_336115.jpg


And here is Rustom 1

Rustom_RC_model1.JPG

Now compare it with CH-3 (Inspired from Same Rustom Design)
1272444191_28141.jpg


Now Burraq

d6b5b5ac-f268-49d4-9f04-a9eda2133961.jpg


Even missile of CH-3 Drone AR-1 are not spared & dubbed as Barq
AR-1
Pakistan+army+air+force+CH-3+unmanned+combat+aerial+vehicles+%2528UCAV%2529+China+FT-5+AR-1laser+guided+missile+Pakistan+Aeronautical+Complex+%2528PAC%2529+Falco+UAV+NESCom+Burraq+UAV+predator+MQ-1+MQ-9+%25281%2529.jpg

AR-1 & Barq
Barq-vs-AR-1.png
 
. . .
ahh i was waiting for somone to bring that up...
i checked that up and i found that its the norm for pakistani citizen to make their own helicopters or avation kits.
the pic you post above is an example of a man made light chopper made by a normal pakistani citezen.

below are more example of man made things
1280x720-SQS.jpg
1280x720-HhQ.jpg

1536020d1422825882-diy-home-made-helicopter-made-two-brothers-peshawar-pakistan-54ce220e3c361.jpg


so when you posted that picture, what your actually saying is look at how tallent people are making things with very little money and no experiance. its nothing to be ashamed of.

Good pint but they should not pass their kit assembled Gyrocopter as Helicopter on Nation TV .
 
.
hold up that rustom looks just like a ch-3/ burraq. so its pakistan taking influence from china where india is coppying pakistan. it looks very similar to the buraq
212919m77775ta70190z16.jpg

the differance is the flir on the buraq is bigger where as the rustom is smaller. and the rustom has a spinal communications trancever/reciver where as the burraq has its communications in the foward compartmnet, hences explaing the slight bulge on the top foward compartment of the ucav.

i would go more indepth but im on the road right now


Burraq is not influenced by China its the same thing as Chinese ch uav. :lol: That Rustom design was first developed in India in 1989. Check before talking.
 
.
Burraq is not influenced by China its the same thing as Chinese ch uav. :lol: That Rustom design was first developed in India in 1989. Check before talking.
the body is the same but the systems are different which are inspired from the the falco thats why i said inspired not the same
 
.
Here is NAL's LCRA (which was Rutan's design & this project was technical base for Rustom 1

And here is Rustom 1

Rustom_RC_model1.JPG

Now compare it with CH-3 (Inspired from Same Rustom Design)
1272444191_28141.jpg


Now Burraq

d6b5b5ac-f268-49d4-9f04-a9eda2133961.jpg


Even missile of CH-3 Drone AR-1 are not spared & dubbed as Barq
AR-1
Pakistan+army+air+force+CH-3+unmanned+combat+aerial+vehicles+%2528UCAV%2529+China+FT-5+AR-1laser+guided+missile+Pakistan+Aeronautical+Complex+%2528PAC%2529+Falco+UAV+NESCom+Burraq+UAV+predator+MQ-1+MQ-9+%25281%2529.jpg

AR-1 & Barq
Barq-vs-AR-1.png


That's a small RC Rustom 1, not Rustom 1.

Rustom.jpg


Rustom 1.

And that's not Burraq either.

This is
1202864_orig.jpg

u7uJWYW.jpg


And you're right, they didnt even change the tear drop fairings let alone have their own missile system.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom