Finally GhairatMand Indian Muslims are waking up to Hindu Terrorism

[PaulSimon]

It's Bindi not Bhindi. Bhindi is a vegetable. The 'h' makes all the difference.

Please add that to your vocab when pretending to be an Indian.

In Hyderabad (South India), Okra (Ladies Finger) is called Bhendi not Bhindi. So don't try to teach me who I am or who I should be.

I have been to Laad Bazar near the Charminar. You are just showing pictures where a few women are wearing burkhas, I'm not denying that women don't wear burkhas, but majority of muslim women don't and that's the fact

Hahaha... Don't lie through you teeth. This is how Muslim girls in Hyderabad dress. Now it is very apparent that you have no clue about India.

It's Bindi not Bhindi. Bhindi is a vegetable. The 'h' makes all the difference.

Please add that to your vocab when pretending to be an Indian.

Don't tell me that this was named after Okra...

https://www.bhindi.com/about-us

 

[letsrock]

Not necessary. Christians have political and money power in India.

PM Modi begs CM YS Jagan for support in Parliament to pass bills.

YS Jagan controls the richest temple in India.

I have seen some forwards where YS Jagan fellow was falling on the feet of Modi despite being a CM. He doesnt control the temple he heavily favors giving control to brahmin priests there which makes him a darling of RSS. In addition there are christian groups like syrian christians who claim brahmin ancestry and are often worse than RSS themselves.

 

[PaulSimon]

I have seen some forwards where YS Jagan fellow was falling on the feet of Modi despite being a CM. He doesnt control the temple he heavily favors giving control to brahmin priests there which makes him a darling of RSS. In addition there are christian groups like syrian christians who claim brahmin ancestry and are often worse than RSS themselves.

LoL

YSR/Jagan are Reddys. They are not Brahmins.

BJP Protest At Tirupati | Over Christianity Advertisement on Tirumala Bus Tickets

Row Over Other Religious Propaganda In Tirupathi ||

 

[EyelessInGaza]

In Hyderabad (South India), Okra (Ladies Finger) is called Bhendi not Bhindi. So don't try to teach me who I am or who I should be.

....

Don't tell me that this was named after Okra...

https://www.bhindi.com/about-us

You have neatly sidestepped the blunder you made when you meant 'bindi' but wrote 'bhindi'.

 

[PaulSimon]

You have neatly sidestepped the blunder you made when you meant 'bindi' but wrote 'bhindi'.

Sorry! What blunder?

The place I come from "Bhindi" means the dot on the forehead and "Bhendi" means Okra.

 

[letsrock]

LoL

YSR/Jagan are Reddys. They are not Brahmins.



BJP Protest At Tirupati | Over Christianity Advertisement on Tirumala Bus Tickets



Row Over Other Religious Propaganda In Tirupathi ||

LoL

YSR/Jagan are Reddys. They are not Brahmins.

BJP Protest At Tirupati | Over Christianity Advertisement on Tirumala Bus Tickets

Row Over Other Religious Propaganda In Tirupathi ||

I know that but what you are so ignorant is that they have a huge brahmin votebank...and he had taken the side of brahmin priests on TTD arguing in favor of heriditary priests. He is just a corrupt fellow who will grease anyone who feeds him. His christianity doesnt mean much and as you yourself pointed out his caste matters.

 

[PaulSimon]

I know that but what you are so ignorant is that they have a huge brahmin votebank...and he had taken the side of brahmin priests on TTD arguing in favor of heriditary priests. He is just a corrupt fellow who will grease anyone who feeds him. His christianity doesnt mean much and as you yourself pointed out his caste matters.

LoL

Andhra Pradesh (AP) is not Uttarakhand or Jammu & Kashmir or Uttar Pradesh.

Brahmins are minuscule in AP and their votes have no impact on the politics. The biggest voting groups are Reddys & Kaapus.

https://www.quora.com/Which-state-has-the-highest-Brahmin-population-in-India

 

[letsrock]

LoL

Andhra Pradesh (AP) is not Uttarakhand or Jammu & Kashmir or Uttar Pradesh.

Brahmins are minuscule in AP and their votes have no impact on the politics. The biggest voting groups are Reddys & Kaapus.

View attachment 576768

https://www.quora.com/Which-state-has-the-highest-Brahmin-population-in-India

They are very influential ...why has BJP set up only AP brahmins in their key posts like Ram Madhav, GVL. Jagan first decision was to confirm CS of Ap who is a brahmin. Understand how his father served undavalli before. You dont know anything about politics or caste system in India and how it is played. Even Kammas are just 2-5% would you say they have no impact on politics ?
By the way neither Reddys nor kaapus are the biggest group by any chance. Do you even have any data on their population.

 

[PaulSimon]

They are very influential ...why has BJP set up only AP brahmins in their key posts like Ram Madhav, GVL. Jagan first decision was to confirm CS of Ap who is a brahmin. Understand how his father served undavalli before. You dont know anything about politics or caste system in India and how it is played. Even Kammas are just 2-5% would you say they have no impact on politics ?
By the way neither Reddys nor kaapus are the biggest group by any chance. Do you even have any data on their population.

Ram Madhav, GVL are the reason why BJP draws a a blank in Andhra.

Kammas have Film Industry & Money power to win over non-Reddy groups. They lost this time because Kaapus did not vote for TDP/Babu.

 

[letsrock]

Ram Madhav, GVL are the reason why BJP draws a a blank in Andhra.

Kammas have Film Industry & Money power to win over non-Reddy groups. They lost this time because Kaapus did not vote for TDP/Babu.

kammas film industry or whatever is nothing really compared to the pan indian influence of brahmin caste. They pretty much dominate the top bureacracy. The have taken many decisions like last minute change of CS in andhra. jagan is firmly with them as long as they throw some bones for his local reddy hegemony.

 

[PaulSimon]

kammas film industry or whatever is nothing really compared to the pan indian influence of brahmin caste. They pretty much dominate the top bureacracy. The have taken many decisions like last minute change of CS in andhra. jagan is firmly with them as long as they throw some bones for his local reddy hegemony.

Huh!

Hindu bureaucracy takes orders from the Christian CM of AP else they would be fired..

Even Brahmins of AP are converting to Christianity.

HINDU ACTOR BUILDING RELIGIOUS COMPLEX FOR JESUS CHRIST

India
2000-03-02 00:00:00
A Hindu film actor is building a planned US$1.16 billion complex in a southeastern Indian state as a tribute to Jesus, whom he has portrayed in films and television series for the past 22 years.

Vijai Chander, whom 57 million TV viewers in India have seen play Jesus Christ, said his Karunamayudu Punya Kshetram (holy land of the compassionate) will be a "living replica" of Christ´s "new kingdom" in the country.

"I have acted Jesus as a fiction so far, but now I yearn to imitate him in reality," 52-year-old Chander, who was born a Hindu Brahmin, told UCA News.

The complex is to cover 202.43 hectares of rocky land in Karakapatla Kotyal village in Andhra Pradesh state´s Medak district, some 1,400 kilometers south of New Delhi. It is to house a shrine and some 19 welfare projects.

"This is a mammoth project beyond one man´s capacity, but (Chander) exudes a lot of optimism," Church of South India Bishop Badda Peter Sugandhar of Medak said during the foundation laying ceremony Feb. 24.

"Jesus said that those who believe in him, will do greater things than him," the Protestant bishop added. Some 2,000 people attended the ceremony.

Chander, who received Feb. 23 an annual Indian Church media lifetime achievement award, said that although he has no "ritual faith" in Christ, he has a "rock faith" in Jesus who will help actualize the project.

Although uncertain about the project´s completion, the actor said many "top Hindu industrialists" have offered to contribute to it. He added that many people wrongly believe that he receives funds from overseas Christians.

Kondal Rao, a local Hindu tycoon, said he was "proud" to help Chander´s new project, which he said will become "the greatest Hindu gift to Christians of India, vindicating the country´s pluralistic and humanistic culture."

The project will help correct an "international stigma" regarding the recent anti-Christian violence in India and "become the living witness of Hindu-Christian solidarity" in the country, Rao said.

Chander, who has acted in 30 films and produced three in the past three decades, said he began the project with the belief that the idea came from Jesus, who will send "thousands of people such as Rao to pitch in."

Jesus "does not belong to Christians or Churchgoers alone, but to all," he asserted, adding that he has met hundreds who follow Jesus´ teaching without knowing him or the Bible.

"I firmly believe that this world is surviving because of such unknown lovers of Jesus," the Hindu actor added.

Chander played Jesus in a film called "Karunamayudu" (the compassionate), produced in the Telugu language in 1978 and later dubbed into nine other Indian languages. He also acts in the current TV series "Dayasagar" (ocean of mercy), which has completed 100 episodes so far.

Basant Rao, a supporter of the pro-Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party (Indian people´s party) who also attended the ceremony, said he found nothing wrong in glorifying Jesus, "the greatest apostle of love and service."

Maintaining that those persecuting Christians are not real Hindus, he told UCA News, "We are rather fortunate to be born Hindus, because Hinduism offers ample liberty to appreciate the values lived by Jesus."

Father John Noronha, secretary of the Indian Catholic bishops´ Social Communication Commission, said Chander´s complex "may become the most marvelous pilgrimage center for millions of Christians and even Hindus."

Father Lourdu Reddy, director of Amruthavani (immortal voice), a regional communication center, said the project will help translate Christ´s "love into action."

Reverend Scott Norling, a Baptist pastor, said Chander´s films have done much more than what thousands of missioners were able to do in the past.


https://www.ucanews.com/story-archi...igious-complex-for-jesus-christ&post_id=15532

 

[letsrock]

Huh!

Hindu bureaucracy takes orders from the Christian CM of AP else they would be fired..

Even Brahmins of AP are converting to Christianity.

HINDU ACTOR BUILDING RELIGIOUS COMPLEX FOR JESUS CHRIST

India
2000-03-02 00:00:00
A Hindu film actor is building a planned US$1.16 billion complex in a southeastern Indian state as a tribute to Jesus, whom he has portrayed in films and television series for the past 22 years.

Vijai Chander, whom 57 million TV viewers in India have seen play Jesus Christ, said his Karunamayudu Punya Kshetram (holy land of the compassionate) will be a "living replica" of Christ´s "new kingdom" in the country.

"I have acted Jesus as a fiction so far, but now I yearn to imitate him in reality," 52-year-old Chander, who was born a Hindu Brahmin, told UCA News.

The complex is to cover 202.43 hectares of rocky land in Karakapatla Kotyal village in Andhra Pradesh state´s Medak district, some 1,400 kilometers south of New Delhi. It is to house a shrine and some 19 welfare projects.

"This is a mammoth project beyond one man´s capacity, but (Chander) exudes a lot of optimism," Church of South India Bishop Badda Peter Sugandhar of Medak said during the foundation laying ceremony Feb. 24.

"Jesus said that those who believe in him, will do greater things than him," the Protestant bishop added. Some 2,000 people attended the ceremony.

Chander, who received Feb. 23 an annual Indian Church media lifetime achievement award, said that although he has no "ritual faith" in Christ, he has a "rock faith" in Jesus who will help actualize the project.

Although uncertain about the project´s completion, the actor said many "top Hindu industrialists" have offered to contribute to it. He added that many people wrongly believe that he receives funds from overseas Christians.

Kondal Rao, a local Hindu tycoon, said he was "proud" to help Chander´s new project, which he said will become "the greatest Hindu gift to Christians of India, vindicating the country´s pluralistic and humanistic culture."

The project will help correct an "international stigma" regarding the recent anti-Christian violence in India and "become the living witness of Hindu-Christian solidarity" in the country, Rao said.

Chander, who has acted in 30 films and produced three in the past three decades, said he began the project with the belief that the idea came from Jesus, who will send "thousands of people such as Rao to pitch in."

Jesus "does not belong to Christians or Churchgoers alone, but to all," he asserted, adding that he has met hundreds who follow Jesus´ teaching without knowing him or the Bible.

"I firmly believe that this world is surviving because of such unknown lovers of Jesus," the Hindu actor added.

Chander played Jesus in a film called "Karunamayudu" (the compassionate), produced in the Telugu language in 1978 and later dubbed into nine other Indian languages. He also acts in the current TV series "Dayasagar" (ocean of mercy), which has completed 100 episodes so far.

Basant Rao, a supporter of the pro-Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party (Indian people´s party) who also attended the ceremony, said he found nothing wrong in glorifying Jesus, "the greatest apostle of love and service."

Maintaining that those persecuting Christians are not real Hindus, he told UCA News, "We are rather fortunate to be born Hindus, because Hinduism offers ample liberty to appreciate the values lived by Jesus."

Father John Noronha, secretary of the Indian Catholic bishops´ Social Communication Commission, said Chander´s complex "may become the most marvelous pilgrimage center for millions of Christians and even Hindus."

Father Lourdu Reddy, director of Amruthavani (immortal voice), a regional communication center, said the project will help translate Christ´s "love into action."

Reverend Scott Norling, a Baptist pastor, said Chander´s films have done much more than what thousands of missioners were able to do in the past.


https://www.ucanews.com/story-archi...igious-complex-for-jesus-christ&post_id=15532

dont talk delusional. In a country of 1.3 billion people you are bound to run across somee examples. Morover christian religion being missionary likes to advertize doesnt mean its all truth. I do beleive christianity is far better than brahminism but that does not give a license to indulge in falsehood. jagan has very limited powers. In india states are just implementing agencies of the "center".

 

[PaulSimon]

I do beleive christianity is far better than brahminism

Thank you. I fully agree with this.

dont talk delusional. In a country of 1.3 billion people you are bound to run across somee examples. Morover christian religion being missionary likes to advertize doesnt mean its all truth. I do beleive christianity is far better than brahminism but that does not give a license to indulge in falsehood. jagan has very limited powers. In india states are just implementing agencies of the "center".

India is a federation of states and believes in federalism. It is the collective voice of the states that counts. Why do you think Rajya Sabha exists?

 

[letsrock]

Thank you. I fully agree with this.



India is a federation of states and believes in federalism. It is the collective voice of the states that counts. Why do you think Rajya Sabha exists?

No it isnt a federation of state. Do you read the news at all- this forum is lit about unilateral abrogation of article 370. Up to 90s India regularlty used article 356 to dismiss state governmeents based on governors advice (like viceroy). It is a union - many tried to change it to federal states like NTR or TNs DMK etc but they havent succeeded. RSS and brahmin bureacracy are fully opposed to it. I think getting out of India itself is perhaps a good choice for states.

 

[PaulSimon]

No it isnt a federation of state. Do you read the news at all- this forum is lit about unilateral abrogation of article 370. Up to 90s India regularlty used article 356 to dismiss state governmeents based on governors advice (like viceroy). It is a union - many tried to change it to federal states like NTR or TNs DMK etc but they havent succeeded. RSS and brahmin bureacracy are fully opposed to it. I think getting out of India itself is perhaps a good choice for states.

You should read this before you argue with me.

What is the S.R. Bommai case, and why is it quoted often?
The Hindu Net Desk
MAY 18, 2018 19:38 IST
UPDATED: MAY 18, 2018 22:51 IST

• 
  SHARE ARTICLE
• The Hindu Archives
  
  
  MORE-IN
  The Hindu Explains
  Who was S.R. Bommai?
  S.R. Bommai was the Chief Minister of the Janata Dal government in Karnataka between August 13, 1988 and April 21, 1989. His government was dismissed on April 21, 1989 under Article 356 of the Constitution and President’s Rule was imposed, in what was then a mostly common mode to keep Opposition parties at bay. The dismissal was on grounds that the Bommai government had lost majority following large-scale defections engineered by several party leaders of the day. Then Governor P. Venkatasubbaiah refused to give Bommai an opportunity to test his majority in the Assembly despite the latter presenting him with a copy of the resolution passed by the Janata Dal Legislature Party.
  
  What happened then?
  Bommai went to court against the Governor’s decision to recommend President’s Rule. First he moved the Karnataka High Court, which dismissed his writ petition. Then he moved the Supreme Court.
  
  What did the Supreme Court do?
  The case, which would go on to become one of the most cited whenever hung Assemblies were returned, and parties scrambled to for a government, took almost five years to see a logical conclusion. On March 11, 1994, a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court issued the historic order, which in a way put an end to the arbitrary dismissal of State governments under Article 356 by spelling out restrictions.
  
  What did the judgement say?
  The verdict concluded that the power of the President to dismiss a State government is not absolute. The verdict said the President should exercise the power only after his proclamation (imposing his/her rule) is approved by both Houses of Parliament. Till then, the Court said, the President can only suspend the Legislative Assembly by suspending the provisions of Constitution relating to the Legislative Assembly. "The dissolution of Legislative Assembly is not a matter of course. It should be resorted to only where it is found necessary for achieving the purposes of the Proclamation," the Court said.
  
  What happens if the Presidential proclamation is not approved by the Parliament?
  "In case both Houses of Parliament disapprove or do not approve the Proclamation, the Proclamation lapses at the end of the two-month period. In such a case, the government which was dismissed revives. The Legislative Assembly,which may have been kept in suspended animation gets reactivated," the Court said. Also the Court made it amply clear that a Presidential Proclamation under Article 356 is is subject to judicial review.
  
  What is the significance of the S.R. Bommai vs Union of India case?
  The case put an end to the arbitrary dismissal of State governments by a hostile Central government. And the verdict also categorically ruled that the floor of the Assembly is the only forum that should test the majority of the government of the day, and not the subjective opinion of the Governor, who is often referred to as the agent of the Central government. "The Chief Minister of every State who has to discharge his constitutional functions will be in perpetual fear of the axe of Proclamation falling on him because he will not be sure whether he will remain in power or not and consequently he has to stand up every time from his seat without properly discharging his constitutional obligations and achieving the desired target in the interest of the State," the Court said.
  
  When was the verdict’s impact was first seen?
  In one of the first instances of the impact of the case, the A.B. Vajpayee government in 1999 was forced reinstate a government it dismissed. The Rabri Devi government, which was sacked on February 12, 1999 was reinstated on March 8, 1999 when it became clear that the Central government would suffer a defeat in the Rajya Sabha over the issue.
  
  And later whenever the case of a hung Assembly, and the subsequent exercise of government formation, came up, the Bommai case would be cited, making it one of the most quoted verdicts in the country's political history.
  

https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...nd-why-is-it-quoted-often/article23929119.ece