What's new

Fighter-jet engines stolen from Israeli base

And they say Pakistan has security lapses , lol engines of f-15's and f-16's are quite costly ones and too big to easily stole them , how the heck thieves did so, Interesting thing is what they will do with these engines , they can't sell it openly in market as they will be caught, they can't use it for their own purpose as being civilians they surely will not be having f-16's or f-15's parked at home .

May be a secret shipment to some other country operating same aircrafts, or selling the engines in scrap lol i hope they don't put it in their private cars just to attain a mach 2 speed on roads
Infact Israel is well known for supplying arms within the black market ...hence some general or the commander of the base wanted to make some quick buks....$$$$$............:lol:
 
.
job done and some may be open it peaces till now for copy it
 
.
Most likely they had misplaced those engines, some short-memory-loss officer was in-charge of it or what? Looks quite bad on that base's security.
 
.
Expect a Chinese version of the F-100 soon...:D then we could see a better JF-17:china:
 
.
Infact Israel is well known for supplying arms within the black market ...hence some general or the commander of the base wanted to make some quick buks....$$$$$............:lol:

2011-06-26__babar.jpg

In this 2004 file photo, erstwhile state minister for home Lutfozzaman Babar inspects an Uzi submachine gun. Photo: STAR

Apparently, even the ULAF use Uzis :lol:

Source: Babar, Nizami charged in Ctg arms haul cases
 
.
not stolen but sold in black..most likely to Iran...them jews willl sell anything for money..
 
.
Those "F100 class" engines are superb, reliable units that operate thousands and thousands of front-line fighters.

I'm not blaming China, but it's silly to say they wouldn't be interested, as would dozens of countries.

Iran could be one desperate candidate!
 
. .
its an old news!
i posted myself a couple of months back...
 
.
its an old news!
i posted myself a couple of months back...

Yes you are right but it hadn't been posted in this forum..... so it's kind of a surprise for respected members and viewers.BTW You can take credit of it by posting earlier than myself.
 
.
Those "F100 class" engines are superb, reliable units that operate thousands and thousands of front-line fighters.

I'm not blaming China, but it's silly to say they wouldn't be interested, as would dozens of countries.

China is rather more interested to the 7th gen engine research that US is developing right now.

Even a 4th gen engine like F119, we are not desperate for this one.
 
.
China is rather more interested to the 7th gen engine research that US is developing right now.

Even a 4th gen engine like F-119, we are not desperate for this one.

if china can power the giant like j20 that means they have already developed better technologies in this field. They are really at a stage far ahead than those F100 AND F119
 
.
They have probably been sold by some dodgy israeli. I mean I cant understand at times israel sell tech to China which then sells to iran which gives to hezbolla who then use them on israel. I suppose it gives anew meaning to what goes around comes around.
 
.
Those who talk about safety of Pakistan's nukes, first get their own scrap safe.
This isin't the first time.

Earlier, maybe last year, F-16 and F-15 engines were stolen from Israeli Air Base.
And they talk about Pakistan. :what:

I wont be surprised if we got to see the Militants trained by Israeli forces (BLA: Balouchistan Liberation Army), using fighter jets in their terrorist missions. The hell.
 
.
if china can power the giant like j20 that means they have already developed better technologies in this field. They are really at a stage far ahead than those F100 AND F119

Right now the WS-15 engine is almost ready, it is maximum thurst is 170kn which is way more overpowered compared to F-119. And its lifespan is also comparable.

There is the chance that the future improved version of the WS-15 which will be used to power the J-20B.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom