Rabiya_Khan
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Fictitious Story Telling and Surgical Strikes
Growing unpopularity of Modi-led BJP led to protests in London dubbed Indian diaspora after the rape of 7 year old Asifa in Indian Held Kashmir, by Hindu Indian government and police officers, was disclosed to the world. The inability of the government to timely address the tragedy and bring justice to the victim’s family put Modi in a bad light right before the Indian elections. In an attempt to dilute the widespread protesting and dissent from within the country and abroad, Modi steered his way to central London to personally address the drama during an event titled “Bharat ki Baat, Sabke Saath”.
As is the norm, the Indian leadership came prepared with a sensational script about Pakistan to read to the world, this time glorifying the non-existent surgical strikes against Pakistan in 2016, in an attempt to divert world attention from civil unrest in India. Even though top Indian army officials and the Pakistani government has time and again rejected the false claim that India carried out any such operation within the Pakistani territory, Modi jee remained oblivious to the controversy surrounding the events and braved the stage in London to tell a fictitious tale of how the Pakistani government was scared to take India’s call.
One particular statement was quick to grab attention from the world issued in the course of Modi’s “nationalist sermon” in London. “I said before India gets to know, we should call Pakistan and tell them what we did so they can come and take their bodies if they have time," said PM Modi. Critics were quick to note that this statement alone was the plot hole everyone had been looking for to finally debunk the false Indian surgical strike claims.
The premise of the contention suggests that India led surgical strikes along the working border to kill “scores of terrorists who were hiding in Pakistan waiting to infiltrate India”. Once these insurgents had been killed, the Indian army went on to “inform Pakistan to collect dead bodies”. This is where the irony of the statement is best reflected. If the surgical strikes were indeed within Pakistani borders, why would India call Pakistan to inform them? They would’ve known because the bodies were essentially in Pakistani territory near a closely monitored border and the country didn’t need any “permission” to extract them.
Many patriotic chest-thumping Indian keyboard warriors rushed to save face after the slip-up by Narendra Modi, claiming that since Kashmir is “Indian territory”, the statement made by Modi was credible. Clearly the need for history lessons is dire because Kashmir is in fact a disputed territory internationally accepted and endorsed by the UN Security Council Resolution, which proves that Kashmir is NOT Indian territory. Needless to say the rebuttal by India has been poor.
If one is to strip away the nationalist hormones raging within Indian veins during the event, it becomes obvious that the poorly executed Indian propaganda against Pakistan is in reality a smokescreen to cover the poor management of the country and growing opposition against BJP led religious extremist regime that has brought the country to a social and moral standstill. As Indian elections loom overhead, BJP’s sins have become a noose around Modi’s neck making him desperate to shield his faltering political career through the art of fictitious story-telling.
https://300wordanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/04/fictitious-story-telling-and-surgical.html
Growing unpopularity of Modi-led BJP led to protests in London dubbed Indian diaspora after the rape of 7 year old Asifa in Indian Held Kashmir, by Hindu Indian government and police officers, was disclosed to the world. The inability of the government to timely address the tragedy and bring justice to the victim’s family put Modi in a bad light right before the Indian elections. In an attempt to dilute the widespread protesting and dissent from within the country and abroad, Modi steered his way to central London to personally address the drama during an event titled “Bharat ki Baat, Sabke Saath”.
As is the norm, the Indian leadership came prepared with a sensational script about Pakistan to read to the world, this time glorifying the non-existent surgical strikes against Pakistan in 2016, in an attempt to divert world attention from civil unrest in India. Even though top Indian army officials and the Pakistani government has time and again rejected the false claim that India carried out any such operation within the Pakistani territory, Modi jee remained oblivious to the controversy surrounding the events and braved the stage in London to tell a fictitious tale of how the Pakistani government was scared to take India’s call.
One particular statement was quick to grab attention from the world issued in the course of Modi’s “nationalist sermon” in London. “I said before India gets to know, we should call Pakistan and tell them what we did so they can come and take their bodies if they have time," said PM Modi. Critics were quick to note that this statement alone was the plot hole everyone had been looking for to finally debunk the false Indian surgical strike claims.
The premise of the contention suggests that India led surgical strikes along the working border to kill “scores of terrorists who were hiding in Pakistan waiting to infiltrate India”. Once these insurgents had been killed, the Indian army went on to “inform Pakistan to collect dead bodies”. This is where the irony of the statement is best reflected. If the surgical strikes were indeed within Pakistani borders, why would India call Pakistan to inform them? They would’ve known because the bodies were essentially in Pakistani territory near a closely monitored border and the country didn’t need any “permission” to extract them.
Many patriotic chest-thumping Indian keyboard warriors rushed to save face after the slip-up by Narendra Modi, claiming that since Kashmir is “Indian territory”, the statement made by Modi was credible. Clearly the need for history lessons is dire because Kashmir is in fact a disputed territory internationally accepted and endorsed by the UN Security Council Resolution, which proves that Kashmir is NOT Indian territory. Needless to say the rebuttal by India has been poor.
If one is to strip away the nationalist hormones raging within Indian veins during the event, it becomes obvious that the poorly executed Indian propaganda against Pakistan is in reality a smokescreen to cover the poor management of the country and growing opposition against BJP led religious extremist regime that has brought the country to a social and moral standstill. As Indian elections loom overhead, BJP’s sins have become a noose around Modi’s neck making him desperate to shield his faltering political career through the art of fictitious story-telling.
https://300wordanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/04/fictitious-story-telling-and-surgical.html
