I would disagree.
and what did he say??
I don't remember the exact wordings, I watched it somewhere, and after hearing to his response first I thought Molvi Sb. khisak gay hain (he has gone mad), one has to be out of his mind to lend his support to character like VM through his soft words, but then I realised later on the difference between being judge of the others and being a follower myself. What most do is judge not follow. And its easy to judge than follow Islam.
If you like I can quote what I watched him saying in his one of the videos (I don't remember the names he was referring to) where he explained how a Mufti Sb in pre partition time supported Hindus claim over Muslims (there was some dispute over some land which Muslims had occupied unjustly and tried to build a mosque). Hindus asked for Mufti Sb to be the witness and after hearing Mufti Sb and how he truthfully declined the Muslims claim over that piece of land, the Firangi judge had to say "Muslims lost today but Islam has won".
by the way, tableeghi jamaat is the "door-to-door bible preachers" of the muslims... they are sometimes sneaky, most times aggressive.
I have yet to meet an aggressive group myself
. Though I have met individual molvi sbs with long beards who don't take into account what they try to preach others, and that makes me uncomfortable but then again its them not the religion.
I am not a good Muslim at all, loose my patience very quickly, but when I am in my senses I do realise that Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) had each and every resource available to him to crush non believers and people who won't agree with him. But what he chose was to bleed himself, get hurt himself but afforded people another chance. "Prophet's visit to Taif and how those people treated him and then his response is a good case study of what religion really is".
that is simply a matter of the state unable to fulfill people's material comforts... if the state had make basic facilities ( housing, electricity, water, medical system, education, justice ) free, and abolished certain cultural events like weddings with hundreds of guests, and made high-quality food available at low cost... and everything was guided by socialism... then these economic/social corruptions wouldn't have existed.
State is being run on nearly century old laws and acts and ordinances. I don't have knowledge of all of the laws but the ones I do are more of a civil ones like "Companies Ordinance" "Labor laws etc" . Can you believe even in today's times our labor laws quote "Paisas" when the paisas have been long redundant as an acceptable form of exchange.
-----------
sorry for my reply only now... i was tired in the day and only the other thread kept me energized.
I can understand how a thread based on desi beauties turned into firangi ones
