^???? ?
See the birds flying in the sky neither they store any food nor they die hungry.
We, human, store food and we are dying of hunger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^???? ?
See the birds flying in the sky neither they store any food nor they die hungry.
We, human, store food and we are dying of hunger.
69? is it possible for a woman?
Do you know that more mouth means you will have to have more food, shelter and other needs. If population grows to this rate, the globe will explode one day.
See the birds flying in the sky neither they store any food nor they die hungry.
We, human, store food and we are dying of hunger.
What is the largest number of children born to one woman
it's is held by a Russian women with 69 children .
Too bad the "poet" never got to watch some national geo documentaries . Birds and other species do suffer from mass starvation. In some case the older sibling eats the young ones.
Coming back to "family planning". The concept of having smaller families is rational. However it is totally irrational in the the way it is implemented in Pakistan. Distributing condoms among poverty stricken masses will not reduce the family size. Reduction of poverty, access to schooling will.
Family size has the correlation with "chances of survival" within a generation and across generations. Poor parents know that some of the kids will perish before reaching the average or expected life. So they tend to have more to hedge against the pre-mature death of some of these kids.
Urbanized families on the other hand do not live with similar level of disease and death, and thus automatically dial down the number of kids.
Humans are not stupid when it comes to survival. It is one of the basic instincts.
Remove death, decease, hunger, poverty, lack of schooling and you will see the size of family will go down within a generation. In few generations you can in fact see a negative number on the population growth like in industrialized world.
Some say it is a catch 22. more kids than what you can afford means poverty, and poverty breads lack of jobs. Sort of vicious circle.
But the day our Zardaris stop being inept and corrupt, jobs will increase and economy will be better.
Na no mun tail ho ga na Radha naachay gee. (vicious circle).
peace
Too bad the "poet" never got to watch some national geo documentaries . Birds and other species do suffer from mass starvation. In some case the older sibling eats the young ones.
Coming back to "family planning". The concept of having smaller families is rational. However it is totally irrational in the the way it is implemented in Pakistan. Distributing condoms among poverty stricken masses will not reduce the family size. Reduction of poverty, access to schooling will.
Family size has the correlation with "chances of survival" within a generation and across generations. Poor parents know that some of the kids will perish before reaching the average or expected life. So they tend to have more to hedge against the pre-mature death of some of these kids.
Urbanized families on the other hand do not live with similar level of disease and death, and thus automatically dial down the number of kids.
Humans are not stupid when it comes to survival. It is one of the basic instincts.
Remove death, decease, hunger, poverty, lack of schooling and you will see the size of family will go down within a generation. In few generations you can in fact see a negative number on the population growth like in industrialized world.
Some say it is a catch 22. more kids than what you can afford means poverty, and poverty breads lack of jobs. Sort of vicious circle.
But the day our Zardaris stop being inept and corrupt, jobs will increase and economy will be better.
Na no mun tail ho ga na Radha naachay gee. (vicious circle).
peace
Yes, if she bears 16 pairs of twins, seven sets of triplets and four sets of quadruplets.
16x2 = 32
7x3 = 21
4x4 = 16
Total = 69.
more kids does not mean more money and more hand, if a poor man has more kids he could not feed them, then the kids can't go school, that means they will remain uneducated and will do unskilled jobs.they will remain poor , but they will also think "more kids = more hands more money " ..and will produce more children..and the story continues.Each word of yours is correct.
1. More kid more hand, more job, more money.
2. More kids more chance that one of them will survive.
The solution is
1. Educcation
2. Assuarance that no one die of hunger or lack of medicine.
3. Educate religious cleric to understand the truth...
Recently and NGO project 100 million death of hunger, climate change and natural calamitly (in next 18 year). 90% ppl will die in coutry like india Pakistan.
Sir ALLAH has clearly stated in Quran he provides rizq to every soul even with one child ALLAH can reduce your risk and you can suffer Islam encourages to have more children that is clear from Quran and SunnahDo you know that more mouth means you will have to have more food, shelter and other needs. If population grows to this rate, the globe will explode one day.
Bulleh Shah was a was a Punjabi Sufi poet, humanist and philosopher. Please think thousands of times before posting something which makes fun of him. He was an Aulia' and has some maqam too.
....
.....
When a child is still in the womb of mother Allah wrote three things for that kid; how much would be given, when will the death come and where will it come.....
@zarvan
you are pretty outdated ..your logic would have recieved with huge applause if it was 14th century .. Some times i feel if educated one can be so stupid then what about poor uneducated whose source of knowledge is very much restricted !!
Sir ALLAH has clearly stated in Quran he provides rizq to every soul even with one child ALLAH can reduce your risk and you can suffer Islam encourages to have more children that is clear from Quran and Sunnah