What's new

False Flag Chemical Attack In Syria? And Syria: Not a Revolution

Syria / Russian forces are on right path to protect the civilian and existing government structure

The folks supplying weapons from outside are the main problem


Hero Syrian Forces
12132016_syria-aleppo-timeline-3-38201_c0-167-5184-3189_s885x516.jpg


syrian-armed-forces-aleppo-has-returned-to-government-control.jpg

1484836487902.jpg


Real Heros protect their civialians not carrry that other flag and borrow missiles and guns from outside forces, becasue some outsider feels your leader is not good for your country
 
Last edited:
.
UN proves Assad regime dropped chemical bombs on civilians


As I said Iraq never used any chemical weapons on Iran. Iranians have lied about then and now are making excuses for Assad now. and no lead UN investigator said Assad did not do it. The link above shows UN proved it too.

None of your baloney above proves anything other than the Syria is the only one who had access to chemical weapons and used it against his own people.

Chemical weapons are banned and you seem to say not only was it okay for Syria to have it, but because some Syrian fella said they would not use meant they would not use it. LOL. Personally, I could care less of you guys gassing each other- should not be our concern and we(U.S.) should stay out of it.


UN proves Assad regime dropped chemical bombs on civilians
SOME UN MEMBERS STILL BLAME ASSAD,
Corrected the title for you after reading the article.
I suggest you read the article that you posted and not just the title.

It only says that Chemical weapons have been used. It even says "“At last we have the unequivocal evidence of these chemical attacks and at last the UN have felt they can attribute blame to Assad and ISIS,” Mr Bretton-Gordon".
As far as i know, ISIS doesn't have an airforce, neither does the "rebels", so they are also likely to have used them.

And it wasn't an investigation made by UN investigators. From the same article,
"The Telegraph, alongside Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a chemical weapons expert and former army officer, tested soil samples in 2014 from villages in Idlib province that suffered gas attacks. It tested positive for chlorine and ammonia." I also suggest you read about Hamish de Bretton-Gordon.

And again from the same article "Since then the government has been accused of using chemical agents in dozens of attacks, most of which have not been independently investigated. "

I suggest you look at UN reports and investigations instead, Carla Del Ponte here for example
 
. . . . .
SOME UN MEMBERS STILL BLAME ASSAD,
Corrected the title for you after reading the article.
I suggest you read the article that you posted and not just the title.

It only says that Chemical weapons have been used. It even says "“At last we have the unequivocal evidence of these chemical attacks and at last the UN have felt they can attribute blame to Assad and ISIS,” Mr Bretton-Gordon".
As far as i know, ISIS doesn't have an airforce, neither does the "rebels", so they are also likely to have used them.

And it wasn't an investigation made by UN investigators. From the same article,
"The Telegraph, alongside Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a chemical weapons expert and former army officer, tested soil samples in 2014 from villages in Idlib province that suffered gas attacks. It tested positive for chlorine and ammonia." I also suggest you read about Hamish de Bretton-Gordon.

And again from the same article "Since then the government has been accused of using chemical agents in dozens of attacks, most of which have not been independently investigated. "

I suggest you look at UN reports and investigations instead, Carla Del Ponte here for example

Obviously, English language comprehension is not your forte. Stating "AND isis"_ does not mean assad did not . It identified two specific cases to Assad only

In its clearest apportioning of blame to date, the UN and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has concluded after a year of investigation that the regime used chlorine gas on its population.

The report identified two incidents in which the Assad regime unleashed the gas in Idlib province on April 21, 2014 and March 16, 2015
.

Like I said, what do I care if you gas and kill each other. Terrorists killing each other and their women and kids. None of our bizzzz ness :)
 
.
Obviously, English language comprehension is not your forte. Stating AND isis does not mean assad did not.

In its clearest apportioning of blame to date, the UN and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has concluded after a year of investigation that the regime used chlorine gas on its population.

The report identified two incidents in which the Assad regime unleashed the gas in Idlib province on April 21, 2014 and March 16, 2015
.

Like I said, what do I care if you gas and kill each other. Terrorists killing each other and their women and kids. None of our bizzzz ness :)
And it does not say that Assad did do it or that the Rebels didn't. As i said, and even stated in the article you posted, it's yet another non-independent investigation. And as i said, read about Hamish de Bretton-Gordon and you'll know why he isn't a credible source.

And the point is, it's not an independent investigation made by the UN.
And lets say that Assad did use chlorine, what would be benefit from using chemicals like that only a couple of dozens of times? He wouldn't benefit as at all. The investigation only states that Chlorine and Ammonia had been used, which i acknowledge but there were no concrete evidence as to by whom. An independent investigation could show that, which is why i would want one done for the attack in Idlib as well. And if Assad is the one responsible , then he needs to be dealt with but as of right now, no evidence have been presented whatsoever other than Jihadi Kidnappers like Dr Shajul Islam that are being used as sources for Mainstream media.
People have been attacked, but no one knows by whom yet. And that's the situation.

So stop twisting and turning the truth and return to the herd if you don't like to look into reports and investigations and jut copy paste MSM sources and Social media sources.
 
.
And it does not say that Assad did do it or that the Rebels didn't. As i said, and even stated in the article you posted, it's yet another non-independent investigation. And as i said, read about Hamish de Bretton-Gordon and you'll know why he isn't a credible source.

And the point is, it's not an independent investigation made by the UN.
And lets say that Assad did use chlorine, what would be benefit from using chemicals like that only a couple of dozens of times? He wouldn't benefit as at all. The investigation only states that Chlorine and Ammonia had been used, which i acknowledge but there were no concrete evidence as to by whom. An independent investigation could show that, which is why i would want one done for the attack in Idlib as well. And if Assad is the one responsible , then he needs to be dealt with but as of right now, no evidence have been presented whatsoever other than Jihadi Kidnappers like Dr Shajul Islam that are being used as sources for Mainstream media.
People have been attacked, but no one knows by whom yet. And that's the situation.

So stop twisting and turning the truth and return to the herd if you don't like to look into reports and investigations and jut copy paste MSM sources and Social media sources.

Like I said, from the article, it clearly states "The report identified two incidents in which the Assad regime unleashed the gas in Idlib province on April 21, 2014 and March 16, 2015.
But, the Iranian is the source of truth and rest of the world body are sheep. Long live Press TV! lol

P.S Carla has been removed from multiple UN Commissions in the past falsifying and blatantly lying, including the Kosovo investigation
 
Last edited:
.
Fairly calculated move

1- Bans 7-8 Muslim countries first so no retaliation (measure put in place before false flag operation is started). Likely the Upper group sat with Trump to make a strategy which countries we will target or who can retaliate back and devised a ban
2- Israel warns Syria of attack on the SAM missiles
3- Private meeting with Pakistan (UK mediator) US talking about matters of private nature on Terrorism, wondering what kind of discussions came into play
4- Privacy laws abolished in USA
5- Russian bombing targetting "civilian targets" to divert attention, russia focuses on internal Terrorism same ploy was done before Libiyan attacks
7- FAKE FALSE flag operation on Syria, to try to get
8- Trump meets China "Tries to divide China - Russia ties calls China 'friend' while threatening North Korea (2 hours before the Cruise missile attack on Syria)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...irst-major-foreign-policy-tests-syria-crisis/

8- Attack on Syrian airfields / so fighter jets can't takeoff


Wonder if our authorities were given advance notice on Syria in recently concluded meeting with UK/UK bodies

I had a feeling something big was cooking, which is why General Bajwa was invited to a 1 vs 1 with UK/US delegates
 
Last edited:
.
Like I said, English Language comprehension is not forte. From the article clearly said "The report identified two incidents in which the Assad regime unleashed the gas in Idlib province on April 21, 2014 and March 16, 2015.
But, the Iranian is the source of truth and rest of the world body are sheep. Long live Press TV! lol

That's not the report. As i said, read the report instead of reading an article from MSM taking the report out of context. And the same people (OPCW) said that Assad does not have chemical weapons anymore but that the rebels may. But i prefer reading the independent investigations instead of the non independent ones. That report was not an independent one.
Which you would have known if you read it.

I don't Press TV's reportage on anything, just as i don't with MSM.
Some people are Sheep and some aren't. As seen between this exchange between you and me.
Has nothing to do with nationality or ethnicity, so keep the racism out of it.
 
.
This picture sums up what i think about anything that the US or the official western media says

17796546_1569945639683656_6813536516016304998_n.png

.

Genius, I think you missed a lot of stuff before your post. The media in question, isn't the Western media. We are talking about video clips taken by Syrian people at the time of the attack and their crying, sobbing statements as they collect and hold dead bodies of their loved ones. There is stupid paranoia about the West and then there is sheer inhumane ignorance that's visible here.

Why are you in Australia? If everything about the West is a lie....shouldn't you go live in a heavenly place like Iran or Syria as obviously, you don't like the West?
 
Last edited:
.
That's not the report. As i said, read the report instead of reading an article from MSM taking the report out of context. And the same people (OPCW) said that Assad does not have chemical weapons anymore but that the rebels may. But i prefer reading the independent investigations instead of the non independent ones. That report was not an independent one.
Which you would have known if you read it.

I don't Press TV's reportage on anything, just as i don't with MSM.
Some people are Sheep and some aren't. As seen between this exchange between you and me.
Has nothing to do with nationality or ethnicity, so keep the racism out of it.

From the report:
Appendix 5 deals in detail with the munitions used in the attacks. There are photos of the fragments and drawings and measurements describing the weapons in detail.

The 140mm system (M14) clearly has Cyrillic engraving suggesting that this is indeed a munition of Russian origin. The larger 330mm calibre munition is, as mentioned above, of a type used by Syrian government forces.
_69895890_rocket_images.jpg


in some cases the inspectors were able to make an assessment of the likely trajectory of the rockets and this again seems to corroborate US claims that they came from areas controlled by government forces.
_69895888_excerpt7_p22.gif


From another report from the UN https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G17/026/63/PDF/G1702663.pdf?OpenElement

17. Throughout 2016, Syrian air forces launched air strikes using chlorine bombs in eastern Aleppo city. There is no information to support the claim that the Russian military ever used any chemical weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic. While civilians exposed to chlorine may exhibit symptoms similar to those exposed to vesicants, such as sulphur mustard, chlorine gas was identified as the most likely agent in several cases.
 
. .
Genius, I think you missed a lot of stuff before your post. The media isn't the Western media. We are talking about video clips taken by Syrian people at the time of the attack and their crying, sobbing statements as they collect and hold dead bodies of their loved ones. There is stupid paranoia about the West and then is sheer inhumane ignorance that's visible here.

Why are you in Australia? If everything about the West is a lie....shouldn't you go live in a place like Iran or Syria as obviously, you don't like the West?

Oh its Mr Viper again, the Mr know it all and the person that has had Whisky with Imran Khan.

First of all looks like you didn't even read the first line where i said "This picture sums up what i think about anything that the US or the official western media says". So to answer your retarded question about where i live, I am not in the F..kin US nor did i say that everything about the West is a lie. Secondly, its none of your god damn business where i choose to live.

Finally everything in my post is the truth and has been proved so.

Also the video clips that you are talking about, i will show you later how the previous video clips just like these ones were also staged.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom