Hakan
RETIRED INTL MOD
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2014
- Messages
- 6,274
- Reaction score
- 39
- Country
- Location
The ottomans may have been smaller than the other caliphates but look at who the ottomans fought. They invaded europe reached vienna, as a result of the ottomans you still have Muslim countries in europe. The ottoman Tatar vassals in the Crimea even burned down moscow with the help of the jannisarries. All of europe was scared of the Ottomans and that is on record. The Ottomans were fighting literally dozens of european powers at the same time while fighting the shia safavids. The Ottomans did unite the muslim world because they were recognized as the Calipha by all muslims which is why the Indonesian sultan declared allegiance to the empire. I am afraid it seems that you are one of the only few people here that have a major problem with turks and it is very obvious. You probably are not even proud of the muslim conquest of constantinople beause it was conquered by turk or any other islamic achievements that happened under turkish rule.You did not unite anything. The Ottoman Empire was the smallest Caliphate. Most of the Muslim world and Muslims were not even under the Ottomans.
What do you mean what signifigance are you crazy? if you are talking about architecture thats not our thing rather we were warriors historically which is why we had dozens of massive empires. We were already conquering europe while you guys were running around the kabbah naked. So what if islamic culture is based on arab and persian civilization do you want me to give you another medal to add to your collection.The turks contributed to islamic civilization by protecting it if we didn't do that you would have nothing which is actually what happened when the mongols invaded. (most of their troops were turks)Can you mention me any city in Central Asia or elsewhere of any significance that was formed by the Turks? Which inventions? etc. All of the Islamic culture is mostly based on Arab and Persian civilization. That's a fact.
Whatever you say. More influential and relevant than a few Turkish tribes in Mongolia that left nothing.
We were already conquering europe while you guys were starving in your tents in arabia. The Byzantines were paying tributes to the Turks just to stay alive while you guys weren't even a significant force in the world. You should also look at all of the beautiful mosques that there are in central asia before you try and say that we didn't build anything besides most of the stuff we built outside of central asia such as the Taj Mahal.
In this statement it is very clear that you don't care whether or not someone is muslim or not all you care about is arab arab arab. I wouldn't be suprised if you prefered a christian arab over us muslim turks.The turks defended the muslims from the non muslims and that is the fact. You probably think we just conquered arabia and yemen because we felt like but actually we saved your butts from the portuguese who had occupied jeddah I dont see you going around the forum trashing them down.Of course since they were fighting corruption, decadence and foreign rule and won. You have no problem with the Ottomans taking the Caliphate from the Arabs who ruled it for 1000 years from the very beginning and during the most important part of Islamic history BY FAR but you have a problem with Arabs taking back their land. Only a little part actually since most of the Arab world was sovereign long ago and some always as I mentioned.
I have a question for you: would it have been fair in your opinion if the muslim persians rebelled against the Arab Caliphs? After all they were occupied right?