What's new

F-35 Isreal stealth aircraft detected by air traffic control radar near Lebanon !

Who cares about stealth? It's not necessary. Okay, let me ask you, which country is planning to invade Russia like France did in the 1800s and Germany did in the 1900s? Cause I can't think of one.
SO WHY RUSSIAN TRYING TO BUILD STEALTH PLANES IF RUSSIA DON'T WANT TO INVADE ANY COUNTRY @undertakerwwefan o_OAND DON'T TALK YOUR SH!T THAT Su-57 FOR BOMBING QAEDA FAG @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
SO WHY RUSSIAN TRYING TO BUILD STEALTH PLANES IF RUSSIA DON'T WANT TO INVADE ANY COUNTRY

Russia never invaded another country like France invaded Russia in the 1800s and Germany invaded Russia in the 1900s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_invasion_of_Russia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa

Su-57 creates a lot of jobs. That's why Russia air force buying it.

If Ukraine even thinks about invading Crimea and taking it back. This will shoot down any Ukraine air force Su-27 or MiG-29.

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
Last edited by a moderator:
TAT IS I'M TALKING PROJECTED THREATS FORM ANY COUNTRY @undertakerwwefan :agree::agree:

Russians are proudest people on the planet.

First space satellite. First space suit. First man in space. First space walk. First space orbiter. First space lander. First space rover. First space station. First modular space station. First fully automated space shuttle.

Russians never accept foreign rule. No point trying to invade and annex Russia.
 
When did I say Su-57 is more stealthy than F-35? Can you find the post I said so?

I think F-35 has smaller RCS than Su-57. F-35 is F-16 sized. Su-57 is Su-27 sized.
SIZE DOESN'T MATTERS B-2 HAS ALMOST SAME LENGTH AS SU-57/SU-27, A BIT LONGER THAN SU-57 AND SLIGHTLY SMALLER THAN SU-27, 69 FEET BUT STILL HAS A LEAST RCS AMONG ALL STEALTH MILITARY JETS, A RCS OF A BIRD @undertakerwwefan :p::p: ITS ALL FOR PLAN-FORM ALIGNMENT BOY, LOOK AT THE SIZE OF BOTH F-22 AND F-15, 62 FEET BUT F-15 HAS RCS OF 25M2 AND F-22 HAS A RCS OF A 00000.25M2, ITS ALL ABOUT PLAN-FORM ALIGNMENTS NOT FOR SIZE @undertakerwwefan :p::p:;):enjoy:

LOOK YOU POSTS ON PREVIOUS PAGE YOU CALLED F-35 HAS NO NOZZLE STEALTH @undertakerwwefan :p::enjoy:;)

Russians are proudest people on the planet.

First space satellite. First space suit. First man in space. First space walk. First space orbiter. First space lander. First space rover. First space station. First modular space station. First fully automated space shuttle.

Russians never accept foreign rule. No point trying to invade and annex Russia.
WHAT THE FCUK @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT WILL GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE, SO YOU SHOULD BE PREPARE YOURSELF FOR THE EXPECTED STRONGEST ENEMIES @undertakerwwefan :crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy:

AND DON'T BRING THESE CRAP FIRST ALL :blah::blah::blah::blah: @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can read this to find how much this thread is bullshit
https://www.flightradar24.com/how-it-works

Another bullshit thread by anti Israeli troll

Right in your source

MLAT
In some regions with coverage from several FR24-receivers we also calculate positions of non-ADS-B equipped aircraft with the help of Multilateration (MLAT), by using a method known as Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA). By measuring the the time it takes to receive the signal from aircraft with an older ModeS-transponder, it's possible to calculate the position of these aircraft. Four FR24-receivers or more, receiving signals from the same aircraft, are needed to make MLAT work. MLAT coverage can only be achieved above about 3,000-10,000 feet as the probability that four or more receivers can receive the transponder signal increases with increased altitude.

Most parts of Europe and North America are today covered with MLAT above about 3,000-10,000 feet. There is also some MLAT coverage in Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, India, China, Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia and New Zealand. More areas will get MLAT coverage as we continue to add new receivers to our network.
 

globalsecurity.org is a less reliable source. It mentions that the F-35 has a higher RCS than the F-22. It is wrong

Read:

Air Combat Command chief Gen. Mike Hostage, according to reporter Colin Clark, "labels as 'old think' those critics who point to the F-117 shoot-down and the presumed supremacy of high-powered electronic-magnetic warfare."
....

Hostage makes another, very interesting comparison between the F-22 and the F-35.

The F-35′s cross section is much smaller than the F-22′s. “The F-35 doesn’t have the altitude, doesn’t have the speed [of the F-22], but it can beat the F-22 in stealth.”

http://aviationweek.com/blog/f-35-stealthier-f-22
 
That's not proof.
look to the side box they had give all major fighter jets RCS @undertakerwwefan 0.1 square meter 2 of B-2 and F-22 RCS have @undertakerwwefan :p::agree::enjoy:

globalsecurity.org is a less reliable source. It mentions that the F-35 has a higher RCS than the F-22. It is wrong

Read:

Air Combat Command chief Gen. Mike Hostage, according to reporter Colin Clark, "labels as 'old think' those critics who point to the F-117 shoot-down and the presumed supremacy of high-powered electronic-magnetic warfare."
....

Hostage makes another, very interesting comparison between the F-22 and the F-35.

The F-35′s cross section is much smaller than the F-22′s. “The F-35 doesn’t have the altitude, doesn’t have the speed [of the F-22], but it can beat the F-22 in stealth.”

http://aviationweek.com/blog/f-35-stealthier-f-22
may be his personal opinion @blackuday :angel:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom