Patriot forever
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2020
- Messages
- 3,375
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Thanks to plmn we are paying 18Rs per unit which has crippled our industries further on top we are loosing forex due to imported fuel. Your argument is illogical of saving 2billion dollars , when your using imported fuel worth many billions. This is what saves forex ..lol thanks to PML N where they brought light yes true they brought high effficent power plants with thermal efficiecny of 62% by the way LNG Saved 2 Billion US$ in crude oil but Saudi didnt like any one playing against furnace oil
Im not bringing Army im saying non development spendings contribute nothing against GDP development also by your logic Ishaq Dar policy of buying dollars locally and keeping stable currency now makes more sense then ever as per your logic local deficits dont contribute to any deficit ,In reality you take loan and you borrow dollars to keep the balance or one way or another it supplements and compliiments each other .China and Pakistan have done many paper agreement still this is going on i remmember in Mushy era it was signed for 15 years or so we have trade of 20 Billion $ and we have 2 Billion in Yuan does it make sense ?
By what logic you connected what I said with Ishaq Dar failed policy. Btw he was subsidizing dollar, he actually pumped borrowed dollars into the market for cheap, learn the difference. Currency is strong and stable when your macroenomics is stable not when you are running a deficit. If there is a shortage of dollars in market rupee will fall, if there is a surplus rupee will strengthen.
You can compensate for internal deficit by issuing local bonds and printing money, which has its own detriments. Regarding PSDP plmn never actually spent more than 700-800billion. And for nondevelopmental expenses you first need to take care of enterprises that are leaking money. We also need to control the circular deficit as well as deficit in gas sector(which happened for the first time in our history during plmn) as they did not have the guts to demand from the public the amount they signed for in contracts. Left it to the next government.
Regarding your last point read my post again. This will give you a better understanding of what Chinese are saying.
'China has no intention to replace dollars in foreign trade transactions in Pakistan, but it provides an alternative currency through its banking channel to the traders.'
Equivalent of 3.5billion dollars in yuan. That's the cap they set.