Ahiska
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,339
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
They were buddhist but are today largely muslims and being Turkic also means being Asian/EuroasianUighur's ancient roots are Asian and Buddhist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They were buddhist but are today largely muslims and being Turkic also means being Asian/EuroasianUighur's ancient roots are Asian and Buddhist.
Why is there tension between China and the Uighurs?
The Xinjiang autonomous region in China has had a long history of discord between Chinese authorities and the indigenous ethnic Uighur population. The BBC sets out why.
Where is Xinjiang and who lives there?
The ethnic Uighur population used to be the majority in China's Xinjiang region
The sprawling Xinjiang autonomous region is located in China's far west. The largest of China's administrative regions, it borders eight countries - Mongolia, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India.
Uighurs comprised most of the population before the heavy migration of China's ethnic majority Han began.
Most Uighurs are Muslim and Islam is an important part of their life and identity. Their language is related to Turkish, and they regard themselves as culturally and ethnically close to Central Asian nations.
The region's economy has largely revolved around agriculture and trade, with towns such as Kashgar thriving as hubs along the famous Silk Road.
But development has brought new residents. In the 2000 census, Han Chinese made up 40%, excluding large numbers of troops stationed in the region and unknown numbers of unregistered migrants.
Has Xinjiang always been part of China?
Xinjiang officially became part of Communist China in 1949
The region has had an intermittent history of autonomy and occasional independence, but what is now known as Xinjiang came under Chinese rule in the 18th Century.
An East Turkestan state was briefly declared in 1949, but independence was short-lived. It was during that year that Xinjiang officially became part of Communist China.
In the 1990s, open support for separatist groups increased after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of independent Muslim states in Central Asia.
However, Beijing suppressed demonstrations and activists went underground.
What is at the heart of the unrest?
China's critics say authorities have stepped up a crackdown on Uighurs in recent years
While the issue is a complex one, many say that ethnic tensions caused by economic and cultural factors between the Uighurs and the Han Chinese are the root cause of violent incidents in the region.
In recent decades, major development projects in energy and industry have brought prosperity to Xinjiang's big cities. This has attracted young and technically-qualified Han Chinese from eastern provinces.
The Han Chinese are said to be given the best jobs and the majority do well economically, something that has fuelled resentment among Uighurs.
The Uighur culture leans more towards Central Asia than China
Activists say Uighur religious, commercial and cultural activities have been gradually curtailed by the Chinese state. There are complaints that the Uighurs experience severe restrictions in the practice of their Muslim faith, with fewer mosques and strict control over religious schools.
Rights group Amnesty International, in a report published last year, said authorities criminalised "what they labelled 'illegal religious' and 'separatist' activities" and clamped down on "peaceful expressions of cultural identity".
How has the violence developed?
China has poured troops into the region in recent years as unrest has rumbled
China has been accused of intensifying its crackdown on the Uighurs after street protests in the 1990s and again in the run-up to the Beijing Olympics in 2008.
But things really escalated in 2009, with large-scale ethnic rioting in the regional capital, Urumqi. Some 200 people were killed in the unrest, most of them Han Chinese, according to officials.
Xinjiang's economy has largely revolved around agriculture and trade
Beijing then increased security in Xinjiang and detained many Uighurs as suspects. But violence rumbled on as right groups increasingly pointed to tight control by Beijing.
In June 2012 six Uighurs reportedly tried to hijack a plane from Hotan to Urumqi before they were overpowered by passengers and crew.
There was bloodshed in April 2013 and in June that year, 27 people died in Shanshan county after police opened fire on what state media described as a mob armed with knives attacking local government buildings
Establishing facts about these incidents is difficult, because foreign journalists' access to the region is tightly controlled.
Are the attacks changing?
Chinese officials blamed the attack at Tiananmen Square on separatists from Xinjiang
In recent months, there appears to have been a shift towards larger-scale incidents where citizens have become the target.
At least 31 people were killed and more than 90 suffered injuries in May when two cars crashed through an Urumqi market and explosives were tossed into the crowd. China called it a "violent terrorist incident".
It followed a bomb and knife attack at Urumqi's south railway station in April, which killed three and injured 79 others.
Some incidents have taken place outside of Xinjiang. A March stabbing spree in Kunming in Yunnan province that killed 29 people was blamed on Xinjiang separatists, as was an October 2013 incident where a car ploughed into a crowd and burst into flames in Beijing's Tiananmen Square.
Who's to blame?
China also blamed Xinjiang separatists for the brutal attack in March 2014 at Kunming station
China has often blamed ETIM - the East Turkestan Islamic Movement - or people inspired by ETIM for violent incidents both in Xinjiang and beyond the region's borders.
ETIM is said to want to establish an independent East Turkestan in China. The US State Department in 2006 said ETIM is "the most militant of the ethnic Uighur separatist groups".
The scope of ETIM's activities remains unclear with some questioning the group's capacity to organise serious acts of extremism.
ETIM has not said it was behind any of the attacks. Chinese authorities said the Turkestan Islamic Party - which it says is synonymous with ETIM - released a video backing the Kunming attack, however.
With the recent apparent escalation in Xinjiang-related violence, the question of who and what is driving it is likely to attract greater scrutiny.
Uighurs and Xinjiang
- Uighurs are ethnically Turkic Muslims
- They make up about 45% of the region's population; 40% are Han Chinese
- China re-established control in 1949 after crushing short-lived state of East Turkestan
- Since then, there has been large-scale immigration of Han Chinese
- Uighurs fear erosion of their traditional culture
Uighur's ancient roots are Asian and Buddhist.
Northen portion of Xinjiang (North of the Tian Shan range) used to belongs to a tribe of Mongolian called the Dzungars. The Southern portion is called Kashgaria is where the Uighurs ended up after their Empire was destroyed and all their cities burned to the ground by the Kirghizs (Another ancient Turkic tribe). In Kashgaria, Uighurs are still the majority.
The bigger picture.
Before the 21st century, all or part of the region has been ruled or controlled by the Tocharians, Yuezhi, Xiongnu Empire, Xianbei state, Kushan Empire, Rouran Khaganate, Han Empire, Former Liang, Former Qin, Later Liang, Western Liáng, Tang Dynasty, Tibetan Empire, Uyghur Khaganate, Kara-Khitan Khanate, Mongol Empire, Yuan Dynasty, Chagatai Khanate, Moghulistan, Qara Del, Northern Yuan, Yarkent Khanate, Dzungar Khanate, Qing Dynasty, the Republic of China and, since 1950, the People's Republic of China.
Immigration of Han is to Dzungaria not Kashgaria. Urumqi is in Dzungaria.
He he he. Go to Kashgaria and see if anybody even speak mandarin.
"Uighurs comprised most of the population before the heavy migration of China's ethnic majority Han began."
I think this is the key cause of all causes...
Nope. I don't support anyone killing innocents. However, I don't understand how the innocent people can be protected by restricting religious practices of some people.You support killing old people, women and children ?
Nope. I don't support anyone killing innocents. However, I don't understand how the innocent people can be protected by restricting religious practices of some people.
I don't think anyone here has the experience of having their throat slit..You would not understand.
Because your throat has never been cut off by a religious zealot like it happens in Syria.
How is following Islamic religious laws and rules going to cause all of the things you cited above??None of your sister have probably gone out for jihad sex.
Or, none of your brother, just because he is from another sect of Islam, has been thrown alive from the rooftops of government buildings.
I am glad none of these happened to you. And I pray never happens to no one.
But stop feeding on your hatred and bash China's logical and legal grievances of ethno-religious terrorism. You look like a terrorist sympathizer.
You would not understand.
Because your throat has never been cut off by a religious zealot like it happens in Syria.
None of your sister have probably gone out for jihad sex.
Or, none of your brother, just because he is from another sect of Islam, has been thrown alive from the rooftops of government buildings.
I am glad none of these happened to you. And I pray never happens to no one.
But stop feeding on your hatred and bash China's logical and legal grievances of ethno-religious terrorism. You look like a terrorist sympathizer.
I don't think anyone here has the experience of having their throat slit..
How is following Islamic religious laws and rules going to cause all of the things you cited above?? Are you suggesting that all followers of Islamic religion are terrorists?
Well, I do understand. Indonesia was also the victim of terrorism. But we can deal against them and reduce their capability and destroy a lot of their cells.
We are talking about two different countries, moron. No two cases would be similar. In Xinjiang, the basis for terrorism is ethno-religious, which is even more violent and hard to pacify. The Chinese government allowed them enough freedoms, but, what they want is to have their own ethnic country and rule under Sharia, that cannot simply happen.
When the terrorist and underground cells are annihilated, rest of the society will be liberated and have greater freedom. No sane 18-year old girl would like to live under Taliban. Xinjiang extremists (such as ETIM) are fighting for such ethno-religio savage land.
You know, we have also the same case as your Xinjiang too. It was East Timor / Timor Leste. It was part of our country, but now lose because we handled them with wrong way. That's why I know.