What's new

Expert who predicted Rwandan genocide warns same could happen in India against Muslims

Not going to happen, Indian Muslims will simply convert to Hinduism before things deteriorate to such drastic level.

As it is a lot of Indian Muslims have at least culturally become Hindus, next step is rid of any vestiges of their Islamic past, names, dress and circumcision will follow next, in the next decade desertion and then destruction of Masjids will happen. By 2040, Muslims will be like Morsicos of reconquered Spain, post Spanish inquistion.
 
Last edited:
. .
Last edited:
.
Expert who predicted Rwandan genocide warns same could happen in India against Muslims

Dawn.comPublished January 15, 2022 - Updated about an hour ago


Twitter Share





16


Dr Gregory Stanton speaks during a congressional briefing titled 'Call For Genocide of Indian Muslims', organised by the Indian American Muslim Council. — Photo courtesy IAMC Youtube

The founder of Genocide Watch, Dr Gregory Stanton, who had predicted a genocide in Rwanda years before it took place in 1994 has warned of an impending genocide of Muslims in India, comparing the situation of the country under the Narendra Modi government to events in Myanmar and Rwanda.
Formed in 1999, Genocide Watch is a global organisation dedicated to the prevention of genocide. Dr Stanton is a former research professor in genocide studies and prevention at the George Mason University in Fairfax County, Virginia, United States.

Dr Stanton made these remarks during a congressional briefing titled 'Call For Genocide of Indian Muslims', organised by the Indian American Muslim Council. He was part of a five-member panel invited to speak at the session.

In his video address, Dr Stanton began with highlighting that Genocide Watch had been warning of a genocide in India since 2002, "when riots and massacres in Gujarat occurred that killed over a thousand Muslims".

"At that time, the chief minister of Gujarat was Narendra Modi, and he did nothing. In fact, there is a lot of evidence that he actually encouraged those massacres," he said, adding that Modi, now the prime minister of India, had used "anti-Muslim, Islamophobic rhetoric" to build his political base.

Dr Stanton said the two ways Modi went about this was by revoking the special autonomous status of Indian- occupied Kashmir in 2019 and passing the Citizenship (Amendment) Act the same year.

He explained that the revocation of the of occupied Kashmir's special autonomy was "largely aimed at restoring Hindu domination" in the valley, which had Muslim majority. Moreover, he added, the enactment of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act was especially "aimed at Muslims".

"It gave [a] specific favourable status to refugees who had come from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh, who were of certain religious groups. But the one group that was excluded was Muslims," he said. "This act was specifically ... aimed at the Muslims who had fled Bangladesh during the Bangladesh genocide and civil war in 1971 and had settled in Assam," he continued.
Dr Stanton said there were around three million such people, mostly Muslims, who had fled to India and "has settled down" as "regular citizens of India".

But the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, he said, required people to prove through documentation that they had been the citizens of India before 1971 as part of a census that was to be overseen by the Indian supreme court.

"Now a lot of people don't have that kind of documentation, of course," he pointed out, adding that "the idea [behind the Act] is to essentially declare them (people who had fled to India from Bangladesh in 1971) foreigners, and therefore, to allow their deportation."

He said this was "exactly was the Myanmar government did to the Rohingya Muslims" in 2017. The Myanmar government, he said, first declared Rohingya non-citizens through a legislation and and then expelled them through violence and genocide.
In this regard, he also highlighted that the UN Genocide Convention — an international treaty that criminalises genocide — not just "covers genocides in whole. It also covers genocides in part".
"It is specifically aimed at the destruction, in whole or in part, of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, and that is exactly what the Myanmar government did in Myanmar against Rohingya," he said. "What we are now facing is a very similar kind of a plot, if you will," he added, referring to India.

Dr Stanton said the Indian government's aim was to extend the census under the Citizenship (Amendment) Act across the country and the "victims will be 200 milion Muslims in India".

He further said that the "idea of India as a Hindu nation, which is the Hindutva movement, is contrary to the history of India and the Indian constitution".
The Indian constitution, he said, was devised "to make India a secular country", and that the secularity it promised was secured in the first years of India's existence under the Congress party.
"What we have now though, an actual member of the RSS ( Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) — this extremist, Hindutva-oriented group — Mr Modi as [the] prime minister of India. So what we have here is an extremist who has taken over the government," he continued.
Dr Stanton then went on to explain that genocide was not an event but a process, and that there were early "signs and processes" of genocide in the Indian state of Assam and occupied Kashmir.

He referred to a conclave held by Hindutva leader Yati Narsinghanand from December 17 to 19 in Uttarakhand's pilgrimage city of Haridwar, where multiple calls to kill minorities and attack their religious spaces were made, saying that the event was aimed at inciting genocide.

He said there were laws in India that could be enforced against such practices, "but Mr Modi has not spoken out against that violence".

Dr Stanton said Modi, as the prime minister of India, had a moral obligation to denounce this kind of hatred and hate-speech, that specifically calls for the killing of Muslims.

He said the language used against Muslim in the Haridwar meeting, which was also used by the Indian government, was actually "polarisation", which led to genocide.

"So we are warning that genocide could very well happening in India."
He also likened the circumstances in India to the events in Rwanda, where a genocide had taken place in 1994.
Dr Stanton said he had predicted the genocide in Rwanda, keeping in view the situation in the country at the time.
He said he had warned the then-Rwandan president that "if you don't do something to prevent genocide in your country, there is going to be a genocide here within five years. That was in 1989. The genocide developed, the hate-speech developed, all the early warning signs developed. And as we know, 800,000 Tutsis and other Rwandans were murdered in 1994".
"We cannot let that happen in India," he concluded.

.
.
 
. .
Loooool...i have been to India. Then Indians were half decent. Now you are just pathetic losers.
Quite understandable. That's because most Indians are ignorant about Pakistan.
They are yet to know Hindus in Pakistan are condemned to a life of servitude, are still kept as bonded labourers on the farms of feudal lords.
 
.
If Modi & Co think that the genocide would be a one-way tradfic; then they are highly mistaken. It would be reciprocal and retributive, in whole of the Subcontinent. That is what history tells us. It would also be trans-boundary, and may lead to redistribution of the Subcontinent. These Hindutvadi scoundrels are playing with fire.......... And don't forget China. Geopolitics is very unpredictable entity.
 
.
Save your brain cells, riots here mean violence from BOTH sides.
We are good enough, minority Muslims here actively take part in perpetrating violence on majority Hindus... The vice versa of which can't even be imagined in some Islamic republic.

Brain cells?
Clearly you need them, jokers like you shouldn't go out in public, let alone a public forum, there's is an acute danger of looking stupid.

So, your claim is that Muslims killed Hindus, it is all the fault of Muslims, one would have to be an imbecile to make such a claim.
The Muslims are facing a genocide and you have the audacity to blame them, shameless.

Unlike India, Pakistan does not have a history of communal riots you idiot, baring few incidents since independence, so stop inferring something that does not exist.
 
.
Indian Muslims are busy burying their head up their rear. Only time it comes out, is when they need to appease modi govt and bash Pakistan.
 
.
It doesnt have to be state run Nazi-esque gas chambers to be called a genocide. Literally all it takes is one armed organised group (RSS) to start murdering muslims, I dont think the Indian govt would stop them.

The question is what can Pakistan do about the potential 200+ million refugees that inevitably run for the border
 
.
Jihad is needed in India. It’s either Indian Muslims die fighting for their rights or they still die but while being cowards and doing nothing. 200 million + Indian Muslims in the world yet they can’t stand up to Hindus. Take the Myanmar anti army rebels as inspiration they 3D printed FGC-9 guns, they converted DJI commercial drones into deadly killers, they made IEDs out of everyday material. There’s no excuse for not resisting oppression. Indian Muslims need to stand up and fight!
 
.
Thanks Pakistan for giving an opportunity for them to catch the bus again which they missed in 1947 and avoid the genocide :

They can even ask for crowd funding
 
. .
Hindus in Pakistan

Impact. Intensity.

Hindus are just 1% of Pakistan's population. Muslims are 15% of India's population.

2-3 million Hindus in Pakistan. 200 million Muslims in India.

Let's just say in hypothetical scenarios, both countries want to genocide their respective minorities, whose impact would be higher? Whose intensity would be higher? How much of a collision would be there in case Pakistan? And how much of a collision would be there in case of India? Which country has more to lose - socially/culturally/politically/Idealogically?
 
.
So, your claim is that Muslims killed Hindus, it is all the fault of Muslims
No, that's not what I claimed.

Unlike India, Pakistan does not have a history of communal riots
Ofcourse, can you expect these unfortunate ones to even fight back? They don't even have slippers on their feet!

20220116_012655.jpg
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom