batmannow
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2008
- Messages
- 18,830
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
First, prior to our research, it was widely believed that mujahideen, or
civilian freedom fighters involved in a Muslim war or struggle, played
a significant part in the Kargil intrusion a falsehood caused by the initial
confusion of Indias civilian and military intelligence services, a carefully
planned Pakistani denial and deception campaign, and opportunistic
Islamic militant groups. The Indian Kargil Review Committee, which
was highly dubious about the role of militants in the conflict, still concluded
that the regular/irregular ratio may well have been in the range of
70:30, if the overall numbers are taken into account.17 Our interviews
with Pakistani and Indian ground commanders revealed that local civilians
played only minimal reconnaissance and logistical roles in the operation.
In fact, numerous Pakistani officers and soldiers told us they did not
encounter a single civilian combatant during the conflict.
Eight years after the event, Pakistan still officially maintains that freedom
fighters and not the Northern Light Infantry conducted the cross-
LoC intrusion. Former President Musharraf states in his 2006 memoir
that the freedom fighting mujahideen occupied the Kargil Heights that
the Indian army had vacated for the winter.18 Three reasons can be
offered to explain why Pakistan concocted the mujahideen cover and why
it maintains this façade even today. First, until the Kargil operation, the
Pakistan army did not consider the Northern Light Infantry at par with
regular troops. Being locals of the area, most NLI soldiers came from
villages near the LoC, which even today do not have the legal status as
being a full part of the Pakistan nation-state. Therefore, it was easy for
government officials to refer to these soldiers as freedom fighters as
opposed to regular army troops.
http://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/67217/excerpt/9780521767217_excerpt.pdf
The whole world knows about Pakistani so called 'freedom fighter' lies during Kargil
This still begs the question as to why Pakistan maintained the façade
after NLI soldiers had been captured and proof of their involvement was
abundant. As strange as itmay seem, the reason rests largely in the legality
of the position. The Pakistan government concluded that it could not have
admitted occupation by Pakistani troops across the LoC because the area
was demarcated under the 1972 Simla Accord and covered under the
1949 Karachi Agreement, and Pakistans admittance of the cross-LoC
operation was judged in Islamabad to be tantamount to admitting aggression.
The legal context differed significantly from that of Indias 1984
Siachen military occupation, which India had been able to justify because
Siachen was a contested area that was not demarcated with the rest of the
LoC. To the Pakistanis, however, Siachen violated the Simla Accord, as
pointed out in chapter 2 by Zafar Iqbal Cheema. Although Siachen was
still amajor Pakistani grievance, Pakistans Foreign Office believed that an
admission of regular troops crossing the defined LoC would be difficult to
justify internationally. In its assessment, continuation of the mujahideen
story, along with a narrative that defensive positions were improved,
would preserve some degree of plausible deniability.20
19
Pakistans perpetuation of the mujahideen deception may have provided
a thin veneer of legal deniability and a face-saving formula, but in the end
it severely damaged Pakistans credibility both inside and outside South
Asia, as C. Christine Fair discusses in chapter 9. It also altered the standing
of Kashmir insurgency. Instead of being regarded internationally as a
freedom struggle, the Kashmir insurgency came to be seen after Kargil
(and especially after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States) as
terrorist activity. If Pakistan had hoped the Kargil operation would
stimulate international focus on the Kashmir issue, this was not the
intended result.
Indias security at risk: Army Chief warns PM
Last Updated: Wednesday, March 28, 2012, 11:21
India
New Delhi: Amidst the raging row over bribery allegations, Army Chief General VK Singh is reported to have written a letter to the Prime Minister, stating the countrys security might be at risk owing to the fact that tanks are running out of ammunition, air defence is going obsolete and the infantry is operating without critical weapons.
According to DNA, Gen Singh wrote the letter to PM Manmohan Singh on March 12, two weeks before making an explosive revelation that he was offered Rs 14 crore bribe to clear a defence purchase.
The Army Chiefs letter also rocked both Houses of Parliament, with Opposition creating an uproar over the issue.
Defence Minister AK Antony told Rajya Sabha he was aware of the letter and that a response would be given at an appropriate time.
Minister of State for Defence Pallam Raju had earlier confirmed that the government had received the letter from the Army Chief and were taking it seriously. The minister added that steps were being taken to overcome the shortcomings in armed forces' preparedness.
"There is obviously a gap in the capabilities. We are trying to bridge that gap," the minister told reporters.
Sources meanwhile said that the Army Chiefs letter was a breach of protocol as it should have been sent to the Defence Minister only.
In the letter, the Army Chief who also had a recent run-in with the government over his date of birth controversy asked the PM to pass suitable directions to enhance the preparedness of the Army.
Gen Singh wrote to the PMO after he failed to get a response from the Defence Ministry. It is no secret that following the row with South Block which houses the Defence Ministry over his birth date, the Army Chief has had to face a bureaucracy that seems reluctant to process files.
Also, experts and observers have criticised the Manmohan Singh-led government, which first came to power in May 2004 and then won a re-election in 2009, for not having made any big ticket defence purchases.
The state of the major (fighting) arms i.e. Mechanised Forces, Artillery, Air Defence, Infantry and Special Forces, as well as the Engineers and Signals, is indeed alarming, Gen Singh wrote in his letter, as per DNA.
In his letter, the Army Chief stated that while there is lack of critical ammunition for the entire tank fleet, the countrys air defence is 97% obsolete and it doesn't give the deemed confidence to protect from the air.
Also, the infantry is crippled with deficiencies of crew served weapon and lacks night fighting capabilities. Elite Special Forces, on the other hand, are woefully short of essential weapons.
Lamenting the complex and slow defence procurement procedures, Gen Singh said that there was hollowness in the present system.
He also hit out at indigenous ordnance factories, saying they produce weapon systems and other fighting material of poor quality with no sense of urgency.
Stating the shortcomings were severely eroding the Army's preparedness, he stressed on the need to urgently mitigate these critical deficiencies that are impacting the operational capability of a 1.3million-strong Army.
severely damaged indian credibility both inside and outside South
Asia
@batmannow What ever happened Indian army Indian public knows the truth and necessary actions will be taken, But Musharaf did a coup to stop the truth from coming out and now he is lying when the truth came out from his own generals.
thats our problem , instead 70% of peoples of pakistan , want a coup to be taken now!
& he isnt lying, liar can be found only on your side friend!
Last edited by a moderator: