Soumitra
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2011
- Messages
- 8,415
- Reaction score
- -17
- Country
- Location
Pakistan could liberate Khalistan and IOK, while China could take back Andhra Pradesh.
For the geographically challenged.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pakistan could liberate Khalistan and IOK, while China could take back Andhra Pradesh.
He was referring to Arunachal pradesh
He was referring to himachal pradesh
I wanted to hear that....
I wonder why the Pakistanis were so reluctant in admitting that.....
Coming back to your question
Do I think govt should a referendum.....maybe yes maybe no
Do the government should actually hold a referendum.....hell no
The place belongs to India
The second part....am I confident that the Kashmiris love India......
no I don't think so......but I do believe they will do one day.....
Showing middle finger to the separatist during elections was the first step.....it doesn't mean they love us but it does means we r in the correct path
I hope I have answered all ur questions
Since u said.....Azad Kashmir doesn't belongs to Chinese......I would like to know about your views on Aksai Chin
This I promise will never happen......
Arunachal pradesh :-D my mistakeHe is geographically challenged and you are historically challenged. There has been no dispute over himanchal pradesh. Before posting just do a small google search
A Chinese statement on Tuesday describing the disputed Gilgit-Baltistan region in Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir) as "Pakistan's" has raised eyebrows, even as China goes ahead with an ambitious economic corridor through the contested territory despite Indian concerns.
Authorities in China's far-western Xinjiang region on Tuesday announced the closure of the strategically-significant Khunjerab Pass, which links Xinjiang and Azad Kashmir, for the winter season.
The announcement issued by China's State-run and official Xinhua news agency described the pass as "a strategic point on the Karakoram highway which links China's Xinjiang with Pakistan's Gilgit-Baltistan region".
In the past, China's official position has been that it does not take sides on the Kashmir dispute, which is "for India and Pakistan to resolve". India views the region as an integral part of India that is under illegal Pakistani occupation.
Despite the official stance of neutrality, India has expressed growing concerns over increasing Chinese investments in projects in Azad Kashmir and stapled visas issued to Indians from Jammu and Kashmir, with the suggestion that the moves reflected a shift from China's earlier position on the dispute.
China subsequently withdrew the stapled visa policy for Indian citizens, but has continued with an ambitious economic corridor linking Xinjiang to the Pakistani port of Gwadar. The corridor, which includes a plan to expand the Karakoram Highway and build a railway link through Azad Kashmir, has been backed by Chinese President Xi Jinping as part of his new "Silk Road economic belt" pet project.
This is not the first Chinese reference to Gilgit-Baltistan as part of Pakistan. In 2010, the Chinese Foreign Ministry in a statement denying the presence of its troops in Azad Kashmir described the Gilgit Baltistan region as "part of Pakistan".
After India protested the reference, the ministry, as well as the official Xinhua news agency, later withdrew the statements from their websites.
Read more at: Exclusive: China says Azad Kashmir region 'part of Pakistan', raises eyebrows : World, News - India Today
Read it and weep india, you can't do jack, so STFU.
If memory serves, China ceded its claim to Pakistan-controlled Kashmir to Pakistan in a treaty some decades ago.
No extremely wrong point of view. time to open some history books. " the Sindh Sagar Doab and Kashmir came under Sikh rule" Ranjit Singh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Exactly......it's time people understand the ground realities and stop playing with the emotions of people involvedA separate Kashmir cannot survive between four nuclear powers and it is strategical importance.
BTW we should resolve this dispute peacefully according to the choice of Kashmirs if not then ready for Rock and Roll.Another Indo-Pak war or HM,LeT,Jem-Indo war.Exactly......it's time people understand the ground realities and stop playing with the emotions of people involved
Okay lolNot even one single GBi, not one, zero
And that 95 percent comprises 10 percent of total population95% freddom fighter wants integration with Pakistan.It was jklf strategy to make Kashmir autonomous but their armed struggle is finished and their commanders joined HM.
Not again......BTW we should resolve this dispute peacefully according to the choice of Kashmirs if not then ready for Rock and Roll.Another Indo-Pak war or HM,LeT,Jem-Indo war.
Okay.....so it belongs to Muslims because they were in majority.....is this what u r trying to convey?????It belongs to the pre partition Muslim majority that opted to Pakistan but was suppressed by indian guns. All else is nonsensical if they the Kashmiris want to be a separate country then why doesnt your goverment accept the 1948 UN resolution 47 for plebiscite what are you afraid of.
lol.A nuclear capable minnow. BTW china will categories big boy or...?Okay lol
And that 95 percent comprises 10 percent of total population
Not again......
better to have one with the big boys instead of the minnows
Okay.....so it belongs to Muslims because they were in majority.....is this what u r trying to convey?????
Should we claim Pakistan in the same manner because we Hindus were in majority also
I tried my best....You're not being very clear on your views, "maybe yes, maybe no" is not an answer, it is a deflection. If India is confident that Kashmir is it's territory, then why does it always claim that it wants bilateral negotiations? And when Pakistan does, why does India reject negotiations with Pakistan? India's stance is contradictory. It says it wants negotiated settlement, but is completely unwilling to sit down and talk. In the end, you and I both know that India has no real case when it comes to Kashmir.
My views have always been clear, if the whole of Kashmir comes to Pakistan, then negotiations with China are inevitable. Pakistan and China have already settle one border dispute, I don't think losing Aksai Chin to China would be a big loss.
tl;dr: You're not answering my question, and I think Aksai Chin can go to China, if it comes down to it.
A Chinese statement on Tuesday describing the disputed Gilgit-Baltistan region in Azad Kashmir (Azad Kashmir) as "Pakistan's" has raised eyebrows, even as China goes ahead with an ambitious economic corridor through the contested territory despite Indian concerns.
Authorities in China's far-western Xinjiang region on Tuesday announced the closure of the strategically-significant Khunjerab Pass, which links Xinjiang and Azad Kashmir, for the winter season.
The announcement issued by China's State-run and official Xinhua news agency described the pass as "a strategic point on the Karakoram highway which links China's Xinjiang with Pakistan's Gilgit-Baltistan region".
In the past, China's official position has been that it does not take sides on the Kashmir dispute, which is "for India and Pakistan to resolve". India views the region as an integral part of India that is under illegal Pakistani occupation.
Despite the official stance of neutrality, India has expressed growing concerns over increasing Chinese investments in projects in Azad Kashmir and stapled visas issued to Indians from Jammu and Kashmir, with the suggestion that the moves reflected a shift from China's earlier position on the dispute.
China subsequently withdrew the stapled visa policy for Indian citizens, but has continued with an ambitious economic corridor linking Xinjiang to the Pakistani port of Gwadar. The corridor, which includes a plan to expand the Karakoram Highway and build a railway link through Azad Kashmir, has been backed by Chinese President Xi Jinping as part of his new "Silk Road economic belt" pet project.
This is not the first Chinese reference to Gilgit-Baltistan as part of Pakistan. In 2010, the Chinese Foreign Ministry in a statement denying the presence of its troops in Azad Kashmir described the Gilgit Baltistan region as "part of Pakistan".
After India protested the reference, the ministry, as well as the official Xinhua news agency, later withdrew the statements from their websites.
Read more at: Exclusive: China says Azad Kashmir region 'part of Pakistan', raises eyebrows : World, News - India Today
infront of a non nuclear state.....nukes matters something......lol.A nuclear capable minnow. BTW china will categories big boy or...?