war is war. no right or wrong.
There's a reason for the Geneva conventions
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
war is war. no right or wrong.
doesn't stop the atrocities on both sides.There's a reason for the Geneva conventions
Not all snipers have a personal record to reach.
If I saw stuff there I might have picked it up, doesn't mean i'm going to kill everyone with it, what a retarded logic by those marksman.
Saw it and to be fair that was from the 60's , everyone took 5 minutes to die in movies thenDid anyone see Taras Bulba ? It's about the Ukrainian revolt against the Poles in the 17th century .Every actor takes 5 minutes to die when he's shot on the battlefield,time in which he explains in melodramatic words how he's happy to die for Russia.At least the Americans aren't so despicably cheesy.
Saw it and to be fair that was from the 60's , everyone took 5 minutes to die in movies then
Damn, I am already downloading the movie and this thread has ruined the fun..
Am shocked.As a film, it was really PG childish plot, boring and repetitive, with extra gore and glorified, self-righteous violence.
The ending saved the film from being utterly disappointing, it was a dramatic end, as far as making a good film goes, minus the politics.
Nonetheless, the entire thing was predictable. I saw everything coming, called it out well in advance, I thought maybe Clint Eastwood would do a better job. But err, I guess I was wrong, only the ending was half decent.
And as for the politics. Yes, it was pretty much a filthy piece of propaganda. One thing it did do well is that it correctly portrayed PTSD and other issues these men face.
Other than the ending and that aspect. I hated it.
Am shocked.
One of the easiest thing to impersonate, with practically nil chance of being exposed, is to be a film critic, especially if the so called 'review' is a negative one.You see the key here is, I almost always watch films for other values, not their politics. And even if you ignore the politics, it was a very mediocre film. It's only made worse by the people rating it so highly.
I have no idea on what the hell the above mean. It really is nonsense. But to any blind follower of Noam Chomsky, the above would definitely pass their equivalent of the Turing Test. All you have to do is refresh your web browser and read the changes. It is hilarious.To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition does not readily tolerate the strong generative capacity of the theory. In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the earlier discussion of deviance is unspecified with respect to problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the descriptive power of the base component is not subject to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. With this clarification, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is not quite equivalent to nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It may be, then, that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics suffices to account for an abstract underlying order.