REHAN NIAZI FALCON
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,868
- Reaction score
- 0
well i may don't like gandhi but he needs to be respected ......This A##hole Gandhi n his ancestors have drown india...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well i may don't like gandhi but he needs to be respected ......This A##hole Gandhi n his ancestors have drown india...
We indians are mentally manipulated on gandhi ,from starting we are told to worship this guy...
but fighters like Bose,Bhagat n others are not praised...
i dont want to dig up the history n write here but i hv my opinion and it cant be changed ....
I disagree, up till 1946, the Quaid was in favour of keeping with a united India and there was a lot of nostalgia in the people too. Our ancestors still reminisce about their homes in India and almost all families are divided on both sides, my grandfather's father and brothers couldn't make it past the border and now half of may family is somewhere in Nagpur. In such a case, people would not have opted for partition if they had been given hope of better treatment than what they received under the British.
This A##hole Gandhi n his ancestors have drown india...
This A##hole Gandhi n his ancestors have drown india...
I have never understood this idolisation of Subas Chandra Bose as some sort of a strong leader with a clear mind & a plan to liberate India and mocking Gandhi as feeble and blinded. For heaven's sake, Subas Chandra Bose actually thought the Japanese & the Germans were India's friends & would help in getting independence for India. What the Japanese thought was made very much clear in their war behaviour in Asia & when they took Andamans. We would most likely have been treated in such a manner that the British would have come across as angels & been sorely missed. The Germans were race driven, Subas Chandra Bose was at best, a useful tool. Hitler admired the British for taking India, once suggesting that Gandhi & all other freedom fighters be executed. Hardly a friend of the Indian people.
Subas Chandra Bose was a dashing figure whose death in mysterious circumstances has kept an halo around him. A careful reflection on his choices show that it was he & not Gandhi who was both naive & a overly optimistic dreamer who if he had succeeded would have probably landed both himself & his country in hot, very hot waters.
Gandhi was the one who started communalising the politics with his support for Khilafat movement and laid the seed for pseudosecularism in India.
As for Subhash, his thoughts were benevolent but his actions like aligning with Japan was not a prudent one as he did not realise Japan were far worse imperialists than British were.
I would say Sardar Patel and Anne Besant were better leaders anyday.
That's actually a bit like saying "IF"......., no end to that. No one stopped anyone else from winning independence by other means, it's just that they always came up short. Almost all such comments end up suggesting that Gandhi should have supported "X" or "Y", acknowledging Gandhi's popularity when compared with anyone else. Not Gandhi's fault that he was by far the most popular & influential. Gandhi did it his way and I for one, hold him in tremendous respect.
Do you really think that you are worthy of passing such a comment on a man who did far more than you or I will ever do?
Sardar Patel was pragmatic hawk, not aware much about political affiliations of Anne Besant
Gandhi called off an entire movement coz of small violence taking place..A person in his place having that power..that command on people should be more mature and less childish.