Even a midget nuke strike will lead to massive retaliation, India warns Pak

[FaujHistorian]

Guys, I would like to ask something here.... Lets say what will India do if the country is not Pakistan but China ?

I am asking this because I am seriously pissed off seeing the stance India is taking against China. Feeling like India is like programmed robot which has only been programmed to destroy Pakistan. In the mean time anyone can come from anywhere and destroy India but India's focus -> Pakistan.

These statements won't hold good until India seriously thinks of all the issues, not getting biased on one.

Similar to the example -> I can't do hard sums, hence will do easy sums. I may fail in the exam because hard sums will come there, but doesn't matter, will fail in exam but still won't do.

Very good question. Very sane pov.

Thank you.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

India took the opportunity of China's standoff with Japan in ECS by trying to further encroach more territory from China.

So China's Ladakh encroachment is a just a punishment response for India's sneaky backstabbing behavior.

China wanna invite India for the foundation of the new BRICS bank, yet India always plans to backstab China at any given opportunity.

 

[Lyrical Mockery]

India took the opportunity of China's standoff with Japan in ECS by trying to further encroach more territory from China.

So China's Ladakh encroachment is a just a punishment response for India's sneaky backstabbing behavior.

China wanna invite India for the foundation of the new BRICS bank, yet India always plans to backstab China at any given opportunity.

When did India encroached Chinese occupied lands?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

When did India encroached Chinese occupied lands?

You have attempted to do that, but too bad you just failed.

1962 was the same situation, China asked you to leave her territory, yet your army refused to stop their territorial encroachment, so China had no choice, but to fight you in a border conflict war.

Back in 1962, China was extremely poor and weak, she didn't want to cause any trouble since she has been threatened and sanctioned by both USA and USSR.

 

[Spring Onion]

read my first post as it says, Pakistan is a Proxy of China to destabalize India, but no one is giving warnings. You should understand the difference between warning and explanation of Indian nuclear doctrine to a gathering.

why dont you read without a bias and you will find that there is frustration in Indian tone after they had faced Ladkah incident. Your Indian govt failed to hold Indian public fuming over the issue and thus came up with this uncalled for frustrated statement.

Pakistani testing missiles every now and then as well as India and there had been no such knee jerk reaction by Pakistan neither much from India. So why at this momengt suddenly India felt threatened? why you needed to hurl an empty threat of nuclear strike back when there is NO such intention on part of Pakistan to strike you with nukes.

funny clearly India is pI$$ED at China and now threatening Pakistan with nukes.

 

[Cyberian]

What's a "midget" nuclear weapon? Is that what India is building?

Anyway, why do the drunk think-thanks in India always assume that if Pakistan starts a nuclear annihilation of India, it will only use one nuke (in this case a "midget" nuke) and then Pakistan will sit back and wait for a massive Indian retaliation?

Furthermore, Indians are usually always day dreaming of fighting a two front conventional war with China and Pakistan at the same time, when are Indians going to start dreaming of fighting a two front nuclear war with China and Pakistan at the same time?

Have you guys already forgotten President Pervez Musharraf's nuclear war threats to India in the ten month long border stand-off back in 2002? It has been almost 11 years since then and India has never dared to rush its troops to Pakistani border again, what happened?

 

[FaujHistorian]

Seems like Indians are getting scared.... first humiliated by China, and now wetting their panties over Pakistan's nukes...

The news article doesn't mention China (but who knows).

What I find funny (or perhaps $tupid) is that this guy brings so much bad name to an other wise smart nation of India. Look how poorly his logic works and I quote.

----------------------------------
First is the movement from uranium to a newer generation of plutonium weapons, which has enabled Pakistan to increase the number of weapons, outstripping India in weapons and fissile material production. Although they are still to be verified, Pakistan has claimed it has miniaturized nuclear weapons to be used on cruise missiles and other short-range missiles. The newer generation of Pakistan's weapons are also solid-fuelled rather than liquid, making them easier to transport and launch.
----------------------------------

So according to this sorry @rse, if Pakistan has already "outstripped" India in weapons and fissile material production,

AND

we have much more mobile rockets,

then how on earth Indians will do "massive retaliation".?


As a I said, the sane Indians should just fire the @rse of this joke of a guy.


peace (and I mean it).

 

[Screambowl]

why dont you read without a bias and you will find that there is frustration in Indian tone after they had faced Ladkah incident. Your Indian govt failed to hold Indian public fuming over the issue and thus came up with this uncalled for frustrated statement.

Pakistani testing missiles every now and then as well as India and there had been no such knee jerk reaction by Pakistan neither much from India. So why at this momengt suddenly India felt threatened? why you needed to hurl an empty threat of nuclear strike back when there is NO such intention on part of Pakistan to strike you with nukes.

funny clearly India is pI$$ED at China and now threatening Pakistan with nukes.

Pakistan's nuclear doctrine of first strike is a major cause and developing of tactical nuclear warhead won't make any difference as it does not guarantee that Pakistan will not nuke the cities. India is a follower of no first use and requires major deterrence and second strike capability. India faces two nuclear states so India has to show some capability of retaliation. Meanwhile India is busy with long range missiles not guided towards Pakistan.

 

[farhan_9909]

who care about indians warning?

If they really want to test our nuclear doctrine..they should go with there CSD and have a try.

we dont care about warning or anything else

we believe in actions

 

[Screambowl]

who care about indians warning?

If they really want to test our nuclear doctrine..they should go with there CSD and have a try.

we dont care about warning or anything else

we believe in actions

If you had not cared, you wouldn't be commenting

 

[Spring Onion]

Pakistan's nuclear doctrine of first strike is a major cause and developing of tactical nuclear warhead won't make any difference as it does not guarantee that Pakistan will not nuke the cities. India is a follower of no first use and requires major deterrence and second strike capability. India faces two nuclear states so India has to show some capability of retaliation. Meanwhile India is busy with long range missiles not guided towards Pakistan.

1. Indian rehtoric on NO first use can be torn by India at any time. So this hogwash holds no water.

2. Retaliation? for what? For Hypothetical self-imaginative nuke attack? when none is on the radar.

3. Any country in the world will retaliate if attacked so this is childish ploy to distract attention from Ladakh fiasco.

4. If Indians find themself in such awkward position then India should NOT have violated the LAC by constructing concret posts there.

Pakistan's nuclear doctrine of first strike is a major cause and developing of tactical nuclear warhead won't make any difference as it does not guarantee that Pakistan will not nuke the cities. India is a follower of no first use and requires major deterrence and second strike capability. India faces two nuclear states so India has to show some capability of retaliation. Meanwhile India is busy with long range missiles not guided towards Pakistan.

1. Indian rehtoric on NO first use can be torn by India at any time. So this hogwash holds no water.

2. Retaliation? for what? For Hypothetical self-imaginative nuke attack? when none is on the radar.

3. Any country in the world will retaliate if attacked so this is childish ploy to distract attention from Ladakh fiasco.

4. If Indians find themself in such awkward position then India should NOT have violated the LAC by constructing concret posts there.

 

[RoYaL~GuJJaR]

This statement has nothing to do with China, its just about our policy and official stand, if we will be attacked by 'Midget Nukes' (Read:- NASR) in any future war with pakistan.

But the timing of this statement is wrong!

 

[Spring Onion]

This statement has nothing to do with China, its just about our policy and official stand, if we will be attacked by 'Midget Nukes' (Read:- NASR) in any future war with pakistan.

But the timing of this statement is wrong!

Why india is getting nightmares about hypothetical own imagination of midget nuke strik when non is in the offing.

 

[RoYaL~GuJJaR]

Why india is getting nightmares about hypothetical own imagination of midget nuke strik when non is in the offing.

Educate yourself.

Pakistan's hataf-IX missile (Nasr) - A game changer

http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence/232754-ballistic-missile-nasr-bigger-threat-pakistan.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistan-strategic-forces/234467-11-feb-13-pakistan-conducts-test-fires-two-hatf-ix-nasr-brbms-12.html

You guys are harping about this so called "Tactical Nuke" Missile (Midget Nukes) since long, that if India will attack on pakistan in case of retaliation of any other Mumbai like terrorist attack on India, than we will use this Midget nuke on your Invading Armed forces, so, the current statement is about the Official policy, and that is "Use of Midget nuke (NASR) will lead to massive retaliation."

 

[Badbadman]

1. Indian rehtoric on NO first use can be torn by India at any time. So this hogwash holds no water.

2. Retaliation? for what? For Hypothetical self-imaginative nuke attack? when none is on the radar.

3. Any country in the world will retaliate if attacked so this is childish ploy to distract attention from Ladakh fiasco.

4. If Indians find themself in such awkward position then India should NOT have violated the LAC by constructing concret posts there.



1. Indian rehtoric on NO first use can be torn by India at any time. So this hogwash holds no water.

2. Retaliation? for what? For Hypothetical self-imaginative nuke attack? when none is on the radar.

3. Any country in the world will retaliate if attacked so this is childish ploy to distract attention from Ladakh fiasco.

4. If Indians find themself in such awkward position then India should NOT have violated the LAC by constructing concret posts there.

Agree with some part of your post. I don't think India would wait for pakistan to put nukes in Its cities before it retaliates. It is a possibility that we would hit first if a situation arises. As for chinese incursion I think our government is still looking into a possible diplomatic solution for this. Avoiding war is upmost priority but having said that it should not be taken as a weakness, we have confronted china before. Needless war will destroy a Nation, A war can make a nation strong as well depends which side you fight for.