Yes I do. I could give you the long answer but I will abbreviate the reasons as -
Anything negative is attributed to 'Pakistan'. Bombs, guns, killing, terrorists, anarchy, chaos, extremism, poverty and the list goes on etc
Anything positive is never attributed to 'Pakistan' or recieves minimal exposure as 'Pakistani'.
It's not like Pakistan does not have positives but because Pakistan has failed to give exposure to them as 'Pakistani' and or sold them as "Asian, Apna, Desi, Indian, Muslim" the result is brand Pakistan is only associated with negatives giving the country terrible perception across the world. Pakistan certainly does not have bad peception because it has been handing out citizenships.
I mean the truth is India is full of shyte and has more negatives then Pakistan ever will have. But in the international perception India is known for Taj Majal, Indian food, Indian fashion, Indian history, Indian architecture, Indian Music. The funny thing is Pakistan actually helps in fueling Indian success by working to help brand India. Half of the musicians, artists or food is of Pakistani extraction. But that matters nought as it is branded as Indian.
The other day I was listening to Nazia Hasan the 1980s pop star. Apparently she had and still has huge following in Latin America. In the comment section she was sold as "Indian music".