JeremyVickers
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2024
- Messages
- 297
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
In response to President Donald Trump decision to impose a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, the European Union has announced a comprehensive package of retaliatory tariffs against the United States, this action by the Trump administration impacts not only the EU but also other major trading partners like Canada and Australia, the EU countermeasures, which total about $28 billion, will target a variety of American products, including textiles, home appliances and agricultural goods and they will go into effect on 1 April 2025.
Trump's first term saw the start of a larger pattern of disagreements, including the present trade tensions between the US and the EU, Trump first placed tariffs on EU imports of steel and aluminum in 2018, which prompted the EU to levy charges on American commodities such peanut butter, motorbikes and bourbon in retaliation, after the United States reimposed tariffs, the EU decided to resume and broaden its retaliatory actions, which it had previously paused in preparation for negotiations.
The EU response involves a two-step approach, first it will allow the suspension of existing countermeasures from 2018 and 2020 to lapse on April 1, affecting US products like boats and bourbon. Second by mid-April, the EU will implement new tariffs targeting up to $28 billion worth of US goods including industrial products, agricultural commodities and consumer items such as chicken wings, chewing gum and women negligés.
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, stressed that tariffs are essentially taxes that hurt businesses and consumers, disrupt supply chains, and create economic uncertainty. The measures are expected to result in higher prices for consumers in the US and the EU, which will affect jobs and economic stability. Both sides' tariffs are expected to have significant economic effects.
Other countries have expressed dissatisfaction with the US decision to apply tariffs, notably the UK, which has decided not to implement its own countermeasures but is still open to all possibilities. 7. The case demonstrates the persistent tensions in international trade, especially between powerful economies like the US and the EU, even though both parties have stated their desire to negotiate a settlement.
The need for diplomatic efforts to settle the trade dispute is increasing as the US and EU implement their respective tariffs. The EU is still open to negotiations and has assigned its Trade Commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, the responsibility of starting new discussions with US counterparts in order to find a different solution. The outcome of these talks will be critical in deciding whether further escalation can be prevented and whether the trade relationship between the US and the EU can be stabilized.
In summary, the EU's retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. reflect a significant escalation in trade tensions between the two economic powers. The measures are designed to match the economic impact of U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, affecting a wide range of U.S. exports. As both sides navigate these challenges, the path forward will depend on their ability to engage in meaningful negotiations and find a mutually beneficial resolution.
Trump's first term saw the start of a larger pattern of disagreements, including the present trade tensions between the US and the EU, Trump first placed tariffs on EU imports of steel and aluminum in 2018, which prompted the EU to levy charges on American commodities such peanut butter, motorbikes and bourbon in retaliation, after the United States reimposed tariffs, the EU decided to resume and broaden its retaliatory actions, which it had previously paused in preparation for negotiations.
The EU response involves a two-step approach, first it will allow the suspension of existing countermeasures from 2018 and 2020 to lapse on April 1, affecting US products like boats and bourbon. Second by mid-April, the EU will implement new tariffs targeting up to $28 billion worth of US goods including industrial products, agricultural commodities and consumer items such as chicken wings, chewing gum and women negligés.
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, stressed that tariffs are essentially taxes that hurt businesses and consumers, disrupt supply chains, and create economic uncertainty. The measures are expected to result in higher prices for consumers in the US and the EU, which will affect jobs and economic stability. Both sides' tariffs are expected to have significant economic effects.
Other countries have expressed dissatisfaction with the US decision to apply tariffs, notably the UK, which has decided not to implement its own countermeasures but is still open to all possibilities. 7. The case demonstrates the persistent tensions in international trade, especially between powerful economies like the US and the EU, even though both parties have stated their desire to negotiate a settlement.
The need for diplomatic efforts to settle the trade dispute is increasing as the US and EU implement their respective tariffs. The EU is still open to negotiations and has assigned its Trade Commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, the responsibility of starting new discussions with US counterparts in order to find a different solution. The outcome of these talks will be critical in deciding whether further escalation can be prevented and whether the trade relationship between the US and the EU can be stabilized.
In summary, the EU's retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. reflect a significant escalation in trade tensions between the two economic powers. The measures are designed to match the economic impact of U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, affecting a wide range of U.S. exports. As both sides navigate these challenges, the path forward will depend on their ability to engage in meaningful negotiations and find a mutually beneficial resolution.
