What's new

EU adds 15 people, 18 firms to sanctions list over Ukraine crisis

Hypersonicmissiles

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
683
Reaction score
-2
Country
China
Location
China
The European Commission added new names and companies to its blacklist on Thursday over the Ukrainian crisis, according to diplomats. However, 'stage three' economic sanctions against Russia have again fallen flat.

The diplomats who spoke to Reuters did not specify the names of the people and companies on the extended sanctions list, and said they would resume discussions on Friday morning.

It’s a further delay of sectoral, or economic, sanctions against Russia after EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton announcedon Tuesday the EU would outline tougher sanctions to hit Moscow on Thursday,if it failed to comply with the Malaysian Air Flight 17 crash investigation.

The new proposed sanctions included a ban on Russian capital markets, sanctions against Russia’s weapons industry and 'sensitive technologies', which would include Russia's critical energy sector, the Financial Times (FT) reports.

EU officials are considering sanctions that would bar Russia from using European lending institutions and, conversely, ban Europeans from buying new debt from Russia’s largest banks, many of which are state-controlled.

“Restricting access to capital markets for Russian state-owned financial institutions would increase their cost of raising funds and constrain their ability to finance the Russian economy,” a 10-page memo presented to the European Commission, said, as reported by Bloomberg News. The memo was sent to all 28 EU ambassadors prior to Thursday’s meeting.

If adopted, EU sanctions would apply to all Russian banks that are more than 50 percent state-owned. Sberbank, VTB, the country’s two largest lenders, as well as Vnesheconombank, and Gazprombank (already sanctioned by the US) would fall into this category.

“It would also foster a climate of market uncertainty that is likely to affect the business environment in Russia and accelerate capital outflows,” the document said.

According to the memo, €7.5 billion of €15.8 billion of bonds issued by Russian public financial institutions were sourced from EU markets, FT says.

Blocking European clients from Russian markets would exacerbate capital flows out of the country, which in 2014, have already reached $80 billion, and could prove to be a crippling drain on the economy, which isn’t expected to grow more than 1 percent this year.

The US has been pushing the EU to step up sanctions against Russia, but European countries have much more to losein cutting ties with Russia than their Western allies.

Europe’s biggest economic heavyweights- Germany, France, and Italy- have significant investment and trade ties with Russia. For example, one in every four foreign German companies operates in Russia.

About a quarter of European countries completely rely on Russia for gas or oil supplies.

Many also doubt the practicality of economic sanctions, which so far have had little effect on the Russian economy, and haven’t changed the course of events in Ukraine.
 
.
Russian companies can access the Chinese capital markets to raise funds. China has the 4th largest bond market and 5th largest stock market. Chinese bond market has pretty low financing costs.

Russia should try to attract Chinese portfolio investors so that Chinese investors can bring in more capital to the Russian economy to offset capital outflows from Western investors.

By 'sensitive technologies' they mean oil & gas drilling equipment. Russia should strive to be technologically self-sufficient in critical technologies as necessity is the driver of innovation.
 
.
Another bunch of sanctions are not good for business because Russians will start mobilization in every segment and diversification goods which enter from European market.
Russian companies will strengthen their position and ties with partners from Asia and again
European companies will be the biggest loser of this politics.
 
.
Another bunch of sanctions are not good for business because Russians will start mobilization in every segment and diversification goods which enter from European market.
Russian companies will strengthen their position and ties with partners from Asia and again
European companies will be the biggest loser of this politics.


murderers are no trade partners. We win. I would not even shake hands with those barbarians from moscow. They are persona non grata.

I did expect sanctions but did not expect this. Not only leading persons and putins friends are sanctioned. The EU sanctions corporations and entire economic branches.

It was not clear how harsh the EU reaction to MH 17 would be. The UK was the hardest advocate for hard sanctions against russia. So was Estonia and Poland. Others like France were reluctant. It is said that dutch PM Rutte and UK PM Cameron called with chancellor Merkel several times. Merkel is basicly the de facto ruler of the entire EU. The group that gets her on their side wins. And it looks like Cameron won her. Merkel said yesterday she will support hard sanctions. Now the opening was allowed and the EU leaders will announce the sanctions until next friday. Its said that entire economic branches will be sanctioned.

The EU is russias mayor trade partner. Experts say that if this comes true, this will damage the russian economy dramatical.

MH 17 was a game changer. Until then Merkel wanted to keep talks with russia open. This changed now. And even the german corporations said that this barbarism must be punished.
 
.
Sanctions are only going to get tougher.
 
.
MH 17 was a game changer. Until then Merkel wanted to keep talks with russia open. This changed now. And even the german corporations said that this barbarism must be punished.


I don't think so. Only 298 died. Think about how many died in WW2. Tens of millions. MH17 isn't a game changer.
 
.
murderers are no trade partners. We win. I would not even shake hands with those barbarians from moscow. They are persona non grata.

I did expect sanctions but did not expect this. Not only leading persons and putins friends are sanctioned. The EU sanctions corporations and entire economic branches.

It was not clear how harsh the EU reaction to MH 17 would be. The UK was the hardest advocate for hard sanctions against russia. So was Estonia and Poland. Others like France were reluctant. It is said that dutch PM Rutte and UK PM Cameron called with chancellor Merkel several times. Merkel is basicly the de facto ruler of the entire EU. The group that gets her on their side wins. And it looks like Cameron won her. Merkel said yesterday she will support hard sanctions. Now the opening was allowed and the EU leaders will announce the sanctions until next friday. Its said that entire economic branches will be sanctioned.

The EU is russias mayor trade partner. Experts say that if this comes true, this will damage the russian economy dramatical.

MH 17 was a game changer. Until then Merkel wanted to keep talks with russia open. This changed now. And even the german corporations said that this barbarism must be punished.

I'm not happy with this situation like many others because we will feel impact if energy go higher with tax or some resources go higher with prices.
Companies from America are happy with this situation because they think that can penetrate more to the European market like result that American products will be cheaper but ours products would be with higher cost so wont be competitive......
 
.
I don't think so. Only 298 died. Think about how many died in WW2. Tens of millions. MH17 isn't a game changer.


It is. Until Now Merkel was reluctant to sanctions. Now she want destroy entire russian economy branches. Russians have proven to be barbaric and we don´t trade with people who place themself outside of civilisation.

I'm not happy with this situation like many others because we will feel impact if energy go higher with tax or some resources go higher with prices.
Companies from America are happy with this situation because they think that can penetrate more to the European market like result that American products will be cheaper but ours products would be with higher cost so wont be competitive......


Morality comes before money for me.
 
.
US and EU done the same with China after 1989. Look where is China today. EU is begging to China now. That is how EU became US slave and paying for their choice.

Morality comes before money for me.

US and EU brand of morality that kills people by the millions with false flag WMD hoax;. NO thanks. European morality of colonialism, looting and killing does not have any takers.
 
.
US and EU done the same with China after 1989. Look where is China today. EU is begging to China now. That is how EU became US slave and paying for their choice.

EU is not "begging" anyone. And nobody sanctioned entire economy branches of China. The difference between China and russia is, that China is a productive country that depends on brain power. While russia is a country that produces nothing and depends on oil and gas exports. Russia is basicly a northern nigeria. And all indications indicate an even further downfall. The loss of knowledge in russia about technology is dramatical. The russian space program for example is basicly at the brink of collapse.

US and EU done the same with China after 1989. Look where is China today. EU is begging to China now. That is how EU became US slave and paying for their choice.



US and EU brand of morality that kills people by the millions with false flag WMD hoax;. NO thanks. European morality of colonialism, looting and killing does not have any takers.

blame the game, not the player. As long we have the absolute superiority in technology and science, we are untouchable.

I personal think this conflict with russia is positive. Russia is a middle power and this low scale conflict allows us to arm up. I see this as positive side effect. Only conflict and competition guarantees development.
 
.
Marcus, if we start conversation about Moral principles of our society what would be referent dot....Pedophilia ???
 
.
Russian companies can access the Chinese capital markets to raise funds. China has the 4th largest bond market and 5th largest stock market. Chinese bond market has pretty low financing costs.

Russia should try to attract Chinese portfolio investors so that Chinese investors can bring in more capital to the Russian economy to offset capital outflows from Western investors.

By 'sensitive technologies' they mean oil & gas drilling equipment. Russia should strive to be technologically self-sufficient in critical technologies as necessity is the driver of innovation.
Good news: Russia hacked U.S. oil and gas companies to defend itself against Sanctions

The Reality of Russian Capitalism, Western Money gets replaced by China in just few months
 
.
EU is not "begging" anyone. And nobody sanctioned entire economy branches of China. The difference between China and russia is, that China is a productive country that depends on brain power. While russia is a country that produces nothing and depends on oil and gas exports. Russia is basicly a northern nigeria. And all indications indicate an even further downfall. The loss of knowledge in russia about technology is dramatical. The russian space program for example is basicly at the brink of collapse.



blame the game, not the player. As long we have the absolute superiority in technology and science, we are untouchable.

I personal think this conflict with russia is positive. Russia is a middle power and this low scale conflict allows us to arm up. I see this as positive side effect. Only conflict and competition guarantees development.

China has caught up in science and technology in many areas and closing the gap rapidly in areas we are behind.
We have the money, we have the technology, we have the weapons.
No one is touching China.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom