Ethnic war in Iran a matter of time?

[Serpentine]

I was going by this in the article

Seriously? 24%?

 

[Abii]

It's from ynet
An ethnic war in Iran is only a matter of time - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews

Seems a big mistake to make Perhaps it's a typo and meant 44% or something.

If Persians are 44 percent of Iran, Han Chinese are 10 percent of China. Where in the fucking world does someone come up with such a number? And why are you advertising it? Too dumb to verify numbers? Too stupid to do a google search? Too lazy?

 

[U8200]

If Persians are 44 percent of Iran, Han Chinese are 10 percent of China. Where in the fucking world does someone come up with such a number? And why are you advertising it? Too dumb to verify numbers? Too stupid to do a google search? Too lazy?

Not sure. It's a very bad mistake for a paper.

It's an 'opinion piece', but should still have been editorially approved first. I was so surprised by the numbers.

Is it perhaps possible he's referring to 'pure' Persians rather than mixed?

 

[Hack-Hook]

For 4000 years, Iran has remained united and people from different colours, ethnities, religions and sects have manage to stay united.

Last time an enemy (saddam) thought of seperating one part of the country (Khuzestan with Arab population), he found Iranian Arabs at the first line of defence in front of the invading force.before him, Ottomans tried to seperate Azeris from us but faced iron punch.

The last time it was not saddam it was mko who tested the theory of reaching the ran in one week . Let's not talk about what happened to them as we all might get banned for violating the forums law about the gory discussions .

For 4000 years, Iran has remained united and people from different colours, ethnities, religions and sects have manage to stay united.

Last time an enemy (saddam) thought of seperating one part of the country (Khuzestan with Arab population), he found Iranian Arabs at the first line of defence in front of the invading force.before him, Ottomans tried to seperate Azeris from us but faced iron punch.

The last time it was not saddam it was mko who tested the theory of reaching the ran in one week . Let's not talk about what happened to them as we all might get banned for violating the forums law about the gory discussions .

 

[Abii]

Not sure. It's a very bad mistake for a paper.

It's an 'opinion piece', but should still have been editorially approved first. I was so surprised by the numbers.

Is it perhaps possible he's referring to 'pure' Persians rather than mixed?

There's no such a thing. Persian/Parsi is a linguistic classification, not ethnic. There's no degree of purity.

Edit: It is ethnic too, but not in the traditional sense of it. It's cultural and linguistic and has nothing to do with religion, blood etc... If you speak Persian and follow Iranian customs, you are Persian.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Honestly it's a little nonsense people from my family had marriage with lors turks and Arabs . And I don't think we even taught about which ethnicity they belong to when we take a bride from another family or our daughters married with them .
Even my aunt married with Egyptian and we didn't ask about his sect or country of origin .
Honestly some guys have strange way of thinking.

 

[Timur]

here's no such a thing. Persian/Parsi is a linguistic classification, not ethnic. There's no degree of purity.

wow I should write it somewhere to post this again when many Ayran Persians of Iran begin to talk about their Arian heritage.. and the other khar ppl

man I enjoyed this thread.. its like a waterfall one begins to talk about unity then other came to underline this statement..

just enable the bot mode

 

[Abii]

wow I should write it somewhere to post this again when many Ayran Persians of Iran begin to talk about their Arian heritage.. and the other khar ppl

man I enjoyed this thread.. its like a waterfall one begins to talk about unity then other came to underline this statement..

just enable the bot mode

Aryan is a confused term these days and morons that borrow the German definition, which was a fabricated definition itself, are as dumb as you are for trying to troll. Persians aren't the only Iranian ethnicity. Aryan is also not a racial term.

Not sure what you're trying to say btw. Your English skills are lacking. Persian is not based on blood or whatever else you cretins think of it as. Do you speak Persian and consider yourself one? Yes? Then you are one, that's it. By that definition the majority of Iranians are Parsi people. My grandfather was Qashqai (Turkish speaking tribe). I'm a Persian because I speak Persian and consider myself one, that's it.

 

[B@KH]

Iran is smart and knows how to play. while internal ethnic disorder is better than foreign nuke war.

This era is very complicated. what looks is actually Not.
same applies to Pak where pro-Saudi fearful establishment is quite cautious now
after seeing the fate of the wahabi terrorists at the hands of Islamic fighters. so its not easy.
why destroy daesh Islamic state in Syria when they want to deal everyone which we could not.
Next era alliances will be unworkable. currently they survive years but coming years it will be months then weeks then day and then hours.

so whatever the enemies talk against IRAN is useless and worthless and they do not have approach to Islam that runs IRAN.

 

[Timur]

Aryan is also not a racial term

one thing I learnt is that no one can switch the bot mode off.. I am just amused to see this thread.. that all my friend nothing more nothing less..

because I have no interest in this kind of off-topics I will no longer post anything here..

 

[Abii]

one thing I learnt is that no one can switch the bot mode off.. I am just amused to see this thread.. that all my friend nothing more nothing less..

because I have no interest in this kind of off-topics I will no longer post anything here..

I don't think anyone can understand what you're trying to say, so whether you post or don't post it makes no difference.

 

[Fasih Khan PK]

I hope not. We don't need more fuss around.