Erecting a monument to Jinnah in Bangladesh

[somebozo]

Lest face it, Jinnah was the pioneer of muslims freedom and identity in the Indian subcontinents and without Jinnah efforts back in 1947, there would be no Bangladesh today. While the Banglis haste to shamelessly erect a monument to Indra, whose actions indirectly led to massacare of thousands of Banglis however they have some explaning to do in regards with Jinnah.

I am looking for some rational arguments in this regards. Because if they refuse to recognise Jinnah, then Pakistan should rightfully invoice them for all expenses, investments and war losses incurred from 14-Aug 1947 uptil December 1971.

 

[Roybot]

Lest face it, Jinnah was the pioneer of muslims freedom and identity in the Indian subcontinents and without Jinnah efforts back in 1947, there would be no Bangladesh today. While the Banglis haste to shamelessly erect a monument to Indra, whose actions indirectly led to massacare of thousands of Banglis however they have some explaning to do in regards with Jinnah.

I am looking for some rational arguments in this regards. Because if they refuse to recognise Jinnah, then Pakistan should rightfully invoice them for all expenses, investments and war losses incurred from 14-Aug 1947 uptil December 1971.

What about the taxes paid and revenue generated by East Pakistanis?

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Let bygons be bygons brother.

Look to the future; forget the past.

 

[Mo12]

Lest face it, Jinnah was the pioneer of muslims freedom and identity in the Indian subcontinents and without Jinnah efforts back in 1947, there would be no Bangladesh today. While the Banglis haste to shamelessly erect a monument to Indra, whose actions indirectly led to massacare of thousands of Banglis however they have some explaning to do in regards with Jinnah.

I am looking for some rational arguments in this regards. Because if they refuse to recognise Jinnah, then Pakistan should rightfully invoice them for all expenses, investments and war losses incurred from 14-Aug 1947 uptil December 1971.

Are you still hurting because they made a statue of a Indian and not a Pakistani?

 

[bandit]

Lest face it, Jinnah was the pioneer of muslims freedom and identity in the Indian subcontinents and without Jinnah efforts back in 1947, there would be no Bangladesh today. While the Banglis haste to shamelessly erect a monument to Indra, whose actions indirectly led to massacare of thousands of Banglis however they have some explaning to do in regards with Jinnah.

I am looking for some rational arguments in this regards. Because if they refuse to recognise Jinnah, then Pakistan should rightfully invoice them for all expenses, investments and war losses incurred from 14-Aug 1947 uptil December 1971.

Now this is interesting.....technically he is correct, Jinnah had a hand in EP too, so they should give him due recognition.

But heres the twist...which one of the two today is the real Pakistan of Jinnah's dream?

Which one of the two today has inherited Jinnah's values--- or in other words, is closer to the the Pakistan Jinnah dreamed of....?

then Pakistan should rightfully invoice them for all expenses, investments and war losses incurred from 14-Aug 1947 uptil December 1971.[/

Maybe once the question of true Pakistan is settled....we can move forward to who owes whom...agreed?

 

[Mo12]

But heres the twist...which one of the two today is the real Pakistan of Jinnah's dream?

Which one of the two today has inherited Jinnah's values--- or in other words, is closer to the the Pakistan Jinnah dreamed of....?

Obviously its Bangladesh right now.

 

[Imran Khan]

MOVE ON we have no bussines in that country why always pakistanis try to attach with a country which is far from us then iran tajikistan nepal uzbekstan even iraq is near to pakistan then BD god damn try to understand it man . thread should be close before troll war start.

 

[praveen007]

why not erecting the monument of Mahatma Gandhi in Pakistan as he is the real force behind the AAZADI of Indian sub-continent.
What are your view to this mr. thread starter.
I would certainly like to know.

 

[JonAsad]

^^ first give due credit to Mr Gandhi yourselves- many of you indians hate gandhi and his trachings- dont come asking for the evidences its evident from this forum- do search-

 

[praveen007]

mr. GANDHI is given all the creadit he is entitled to and we specialy in India respect him, and yes there are some individual fragment in India who oppose Gandhi's few idea, they are entitled to there openion . we cant force our openion on them.
And obout hating him or his teaching, he is only a human being who had reached to hightes but there was some flaws. And that was the reason for some to not liking him.
Now if you whant to know about those you should consult mr. Gandhi's autobigraphy written by him and several other writers then come and discuss in new thread as its off topic for this thread.

 

[Punjabbi Munda]

^^ first give due credit to Mr Gandhi yourselves- many of you indians hate gandhi and his trachings- dont come asking for the evidences its evident from this forum- do search-

Whats your opinion..who would you choose Bhagat Singh or Gandhi?A person who died happily at the age of 24 for the sake of freeing the nation(Mine and yours) from the British rule or Gandhi,who could have saved Bhagat Singh and died at pretty old age(that too murdered)..

 

[Rafi]

Whats your opinion..who would you choose Bhagat Singh or Gandhi?A person who died happily at the age of 24 for the sake of freeing the nation(Mine and yours) from the British rule or Gandhi,who could have saved Bhagat Singh and died at pretty old age(that too murdered)..

Bhagat died for the principle of Hindu dominance over the Muslim majority Punjabis

 

[jdme]

Bhagat died for the principle of Hindu dominance over the Muslim majority Punjabis

You do know he was Sikh, right? Before EI takeover, Sikh kinds used to rule much of Punjab (including Pakistani one). You need to think beyond hate.

 

[praveen007]

Bhagat died for the principle of Hindu dominance over the Muslim majority Punjabis

.
Your logic and knowledge is at flaw here.
Please search about him , read it and then put your view.
Bhagat Singh is not a racist like some one who had his lifes goal to create a nation based on religion and his idology.
He died for his country with out any remorse so that his country become free one day.untry become free one day.

 

[Tangent]

MOVE ON we have no bussines in that country why always pakistanis try to attach with a country which is far from us then iran tajikistan nepal uzbekstan even iraq is near to pakistan then BD god damn try to understand it man . thread should be close before troll war start.

Agreed 100%, pakistan should start thinking BD as a "Country" as they do to SL or any other country....they should stop considering as "east pakistan".
Move On ..
Same with India.. We should ( and I think majority have) stop considering ourselves as "Liberators" of BD.