What's new

Erdogan about secularism

demonizing Islam and its values such that people forget their religion.

I don't think that is what Ataturk had in mind.

On 1 March 1924, at the Assembly, Mustafa Kemal said:

"The religion of Islam will be elevated if it will cease to be a political instrument, as had been the case in the past."
-Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
 
.
I don't think that is what Ataturk had in mind.

On 1 March 1924, at the Assembly, Mustafa Kemal said:

"The religion of Islam will be elevated if it will cease to be a political instrument, as had been the case in the past."
-Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
Those phrases of him get consequently ignored while those that sound like as if he was against religion get highlighted over and over again.
 
. . .
for a muslim lets better say for a mu'min secularism is like eating pork..
You said the bitter truth, for some accepting the ways of the kafir is itself kufr.
Secularism is a bitter pill to swallow for a firm believer.
 
.
I don't think that is what Ataturk had in mind.

On 1 March 1924, at the Assembly, Mustafa Kemal said:

"The religion of Islam will be elevated if it will cease to be a political instrument, as had been the case in the past."
-Mustafa Kemal Ataturk
Atatürk was surely a man of strategy, he has used many twisting phrases. I don't like to spend time translating them into English, so you can do that work on your own, but I'll share you what he said:

"Fakat bu prensipleri, gökten indiği sanılan kitapların doğmalarıyla asla bir tutmamalıdır." Source: Last parliament talk in 1938.

"Suçlu Allah'ın dinidir." Source: Atatürk's hand writing, book: Medeni Bilgiler, author: Afet İnan

"Kuran'ın yasalarını Muhammed yazmıştır." Source: A forcefully studied textbook by Atatürk. In 1938.

"Din, körü körüne bağlanmaktır." Source: Atatürk's hand writing, book: Medeni Bilgiler, author: Afet İnan

"İnsanları Allah değil "tabiat" üretti" Source: Thoughts of Atatürk, compiled by Prof. Enver Ziya

"Çünkü malumdur ki, insan tabiatın mahlukudur" Source: Atatürk's hand writing, book: Medeni Bilgiler, author: Afet İnan

There are many more quotes. So there is no point in finding quotes that may praise Islam, there are also one that praises prophet Muhammed (pbuh), which is overly used by kemalists.

If you ask me, I don't care how atheist he is. But I care that he deliberately was trying to erase the past of this nation and religion. But since you claim that he is had good things in mind about Islam, here are my two cents.

@xenon54 good friend, in my previous post I already gave subtle evidence of how he tried to erase Islam from the surface of Turkey.

 
.
Pakistan is not a secular country.
Pakistan has nothing to do with Turkey.
You said secularism is rubbish. Then you said not for Pakistan.

My question to you is just this: How is secularism rubbish. (not related to Pakistan, but in itself)
 
.
Atatürk was surely a man of strategy, he has used many twisting phrases. I don't like to spend time translating them into English, so you can do that work on your own, but I'll share you what he said:

"Fakat bu prensipleri, gökten indiği sanılan kitapların doğmalarıyla asla bir tutmamalıdır." Source: Last parliament talk in 1938.

"Suçlu Allah'ın dinidir." Source: Atatürk's hand writing, book: Medeni Bilgiler, author: Afet İnan

"Kuran'ın yasalarını Muhammed yazmıştır." Source: A forcefully studied textbook by Atatürk. In 1938.

"Din, körü körüne bağlanmaktır." Source: Atatürk's hand writing, book: Medeni Bilgiler, author: Afet İnan

"İnsanları Allah değil "tabiat" üretti" Source: Thoughts of Atatürk, compiled by Prof. Enver Ziya

"Çünkü malumdur ki, insan tabiatın mahlukudur" Source: Atatürk's hand writing, book: Medeni Bilgiler, author: Afet İnan

There are many more quotes. So there is no point in finding quotes that may praise Islam, there are also one that praises prophet Muhammed (pbuh), which is overly used by kemalists.

If you ask me, I don't care how atheist he is. But I care that he deliberately was trying to erase the past of this nation and religion. But since you claim that he is had good things in mind about Islam, here are my two cents.

@xenon54 good friend, in my previous post I already gave subtle evidence of how he tried to erase Islam from the surface of Turkey.
Most of them are cut out of context or his own views but that doesnt mean he wanted everybody to forget Islam, if he wanted so then he wouldnt allow a religion ministry thats funding all the mosques and imams in the country.
He wont choose Istiklal Marsi full of religious references for our hymn.
He wont choose a Ottoman Flag thats still our flag till today.

Or you wont hear this message from Atatürk that Erdogan is reading below.


Lets say he was atheist, even then it doesnt mean he wanted to erase Islam, and believe me if he wanted we'd know it better today.
 
.
@Zulkarneyn @KediKesenFare @Selim I First of all can I say I find the subject of this thread exciting. The issues you raised are profound and will involve all Muslim's from across the world to face at some stage or another. These are crossroads that I find myself familar with. The answers will decide the destiny of a good chunk of humanity.

As a intro I would like to declare that I have been a 'Kemalist' from young age. Indeed when I read about Kemal Ataturk in my 20s I was bought. However over the years as I have got older and in particular last few years perhaps as a function of age and increasingly conservatism that tends to creap in I have began to feel uncomfortable with some of his legacy.

I reiterate I still think Kemal Ataturk was needed for his time and indeed he is great but like a poster mentioned here no human being is infallible.

The problem I see is Kemalism is opposite of Islamism. Both are extremes. The real Gordion knot we need to untangle is how to achieve the balance between the two. I have to admit thus far I have read widely but this goal remain elusive.

Let's move away from the theory and look at something practical. Take for example adultery. This is a example (along with few others) where I have been having my doubts about Western legal concepts. If I drive my car without insurance I commit serious criminal offence. If I park my car for few minutes next to a shop with yellow lines I will be fined. The reason are simple - a crime is "act harmful not only to some individual or individuals but also to a community, society or the state" and since havimng no insurance might cause damage to others society has legislated that as a crime. In order to improve traffic flow and advance traffic safety we have parking fines. These are countless examples where the state restricts out freedom in order to create a safer, better and pleasant society.

However in the West no state will dare venture into restricting destructive human sexual behaviour. Let's take a test case. A man and women have a affair. Both are married. Both have children. The result of this affair will cause immeasurable pain to the spouses who have been cheated. If the marriage falls apart the children in both familes will suffer enormously. When the affair comes out it will cause internal conflict and possibly lead to violence in the household. A simple affair could lead to broken lives, broken financial structures. Police time might get wasted. Enormous legal bills will rise with the inevitable divorce proceedings.

Yet a person about to commit adultery would be more afraid where he parks his car then where he parks his pen*is. I have a brother who works in the social services and the toughest time he had was when working on the 'frontline' as case social worker. The amount of cyclical suffering he saw was beyond belief. There was one example where a women had left her husband with one child but had taken the other child to live with another guy. The husband was concerned that his one year old daughter was vulnerable to abuse as the guy she was with was dangerous.

Following protocols that require such reports to be investigated he and his colleague went to her address - a council flat. As they went in there was threatening looking Afro-Caribean. They went through the standard questions and all ticked okay. However as they left they felt terrible. When they went next day to the dad to tell him everything was okay, he pleaded for them to do something. He asked if they would like their kid left in the same surroundings. On further checks the women concerned had another child in social services care from a previous relationship. six months down the road the girl was taken off her because of concerns about her safety but the women was pregnent again.

This cost of this to society is enormous - welfare benefits. The council flat. The broken children who will grow to be petty criminals or drug addicts. The cycle of cost and suffering will continue. All data shows most children from droken families are less likely to get their basic education and more prone to crime. Yet the state will not do anything in terms of legislation that might try to restrict such behaviour or try to create more accountability. On the other hand the same state invests lot of energy into restricting my choice to park the car when arguably the negetive consequences of my parking are going to be minor in comparison to social breakdowns.

Another exmple is we have legal rights over our parents inheritance but we have no legal obligation to care for them. I might not see my dad for the next ten years but if he goes then I have every right to go running and grab his estate. All these are secular failings. I am not certainly advocating Saudi system or even religion like in Pakistan where the mullahs have reduced it to blasphemy, kaffir and beards. I think those countries could do with a dose of Kemalism. However here I am addressing some of the things that concern me about secular societies. How do we marry the best aspects of Kemalism with conservative religious values and create a new way forward in what might be described as Islamic reformation?

And what percentage of people think like you guys (Zulkarneyn/Kedikesenfare) in Turkey? A guess would do. @Baybars Han @xenon54 Your guess also invited please.

Ps. This is great thread and I would ask the mods to please keep it under watch. We could have genuinly interesting discussion here touching some vital contours of life and societies we live in and the role of Islam.

This is a extreme example. Just follow the destruction > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Northumbria_Police_manhunt
 
Last edited:
.
@Zulkarneyn @KediKesenFare @Selim I First of all can I say I find the subject of this thread exciting. The issues you raised are profound and will involve all Muslim's from across the world to face at some stage or another. These are crossroads that I find myself familar with. The answers will decide the destiny of a good chunk of humanity.

As a intro I would like to declare that I have been a 'Kemalist' from young age. Indeed when I read about Kemal Ataturk in my 20s I was bought. However over the years as I have got older and in particular last few years perhaps as a function of age and increasingly conservatism that tends to creap in I have began to feel uncomfortable with some of his legacy.

I reiterate I still think Kemal Ataturk was needed for his time and indeed he is great but like a poster mentioned here no human being is infallible.

The problem I see is Kemalism is opposite of Islamism. Both are extremes. The real Gordion knot we need to untangle is how to achieve the balance between the two. I have to admit thus far I have read widely but this goal remain elusive.

Let's move away from the theory and look at something practical. Take for example adultery. This is a example (along with few others) where I have been having my doubts about Western legal concepts. If I drive my car without insurance I commit serious criminal offence. If I park my car for few minutes next to a shop with yellow lines I will be fined. The reason are simple - a crime is "act harmful not only to some individual or individuals but also to a community, society or the state" and since havimng no insurance might cause damage to others society has legislated that as a crime. In order to improve traffic flow and advance traffic safety we have parking fines. These are countless examples where the state restricts out freedom in order to create a safer, better and pleasant society.

However in the West no state will dare venture into restricting destructive human sexual behaviour. Let's take a test case. A man and women have a affair. Both are married. Both have children. The result of this affair will cause immeasurable pain to the spouses who have been cheated. If the marriage falls apart the children in both familes will suffer enormously. When the affair comes out it will cause internal conflict and possibly lead to violence in the household. A simple affair could lead to broken lives, broken financial structures. Police time might get wasted. Enormous legal bills will rise with the inevitable divorce proceedings.

Yet a person about to commit adultery would be more afraid where he parks his car then where he parks his pen*is. I have a brother who works in the social services and the toughest time he had was when working on the 'frontline' as case social worker. The amount of cyclical suffering he saw was beyond belief. There was one example where a women had left her husband with one child but had taken the other child to live with another guy. The husband was concerned that his one year old daughter was vulnerable to abuse as the guy she was with was dangerous.

Following protocols that require such reports to be investigated he and his colleague went to her address - a council flat. As they went in there was threatening looking Afro-Caribean. They went through the standard questions and all ticked okay. However as they left they felt terrible. When they went next day to the dad to tell him everything was okay, he pleaded for them to do something. He asked if they would like their kid left in the same surroundings. On further checks the women concerned had another child in social services care from a previous relationship. six months down the road the girl was taken off her because of concerns about her safety but the women was pregnent again.

This cost of this to society is enormous - welfare benefits. The council flat. The broken children who will grow to be petty criminals or drug addicts. The cycle of cost and suffering will continue. All data shows most children from droken families are less likely to get their basic education and more prone to crime. Yet the state will not do anything in terms of legislation that might try to restrict such behaviour or try to create more accountability. On the other hand the same state invests lot of energy into restricting my choice to park the car when arguably the negetive consequences of my parking are going to be minor in comparison to social breakdowns.

Another exmple is we have legal rights over our parents inheritance but we have no legal obligation to care for them. I might not see my dad for the next ten years but if goes then I have every right to running and gran his estate. All these are secular failings. I am not certainly advocating Saudi system or even religion like in Pakistan where the mullahs have reduced it to blasphemy, kaffir and beards. I think those countries could do with a dose of Kemalism. However here I am addressing some of the things that concern me about secular societies. How do we marry the best aspects of Kemalism with conservative religious values and create a new way forward in what might be described as Islamic reformation?

And what percentage of people think like you guys (Zulkarneyn/Kedikesenfare) in Turkey? A guess would do. @Baybars Han @xenon54 Your guess also invited please.

Ps. This is great thread and I would ask the mods to please keep it under watch. We could have genuinly interesting discussion here touching some vital contours of life and societies we live in and the role of Islam.

Thank you for sharing your mind, you really came up with great examples of the controversy fragilities and failures of a secular order. I agree with your points to a very high degree.

The question of marrying the best of Kemalism and conservative Islamic values is a rather challenging but interesting phenomena. I believe we are seing some fractions of it with the AKP government in Turkey. Afterall it's not an Islamic Shariah rule, nor is it anti-Islamic Kemalism. So there you have somewhat a mixture of both ideologies to certain extent.

If you really want to read arabic then bug off to the arabian desert. At least stop posting from 5 accounts Zulkarneyn.
@Kaptaan I would appreciate if you could help me with giving this man somewhat a warning, he is deliberately accusing me of being Zulkarneyn whenever he runs short of arguments. It's really becoming annoying.
 
.
I would appreciate if you could help me with giving this man somewhat a warning, he is deliberately accusing me of being Zulkarneyn whenever he runs short of arguments. It's really becoming annoying.
Well All I can suggest to him is report his accusation to the mods who can look into his allegation. As with regards to @Baybars Han I think he should "play the ball and not the man". If he has a case he ought to make a constructive argument. I am a secularist (often get abused for being one) but the fact is there are some aspects of secularism that concern me - I touched on some above. In Western societies men have effectively legally castatred themselves. I believe in gender equality but all too often it is gender inequality (male) that is rampant in the West.

@Fenrir You don't feel like looking into this?

*Ps. And can the Turkish members give us a idea of what percentage in Turkey would subscribe to @Zulkarneyn views?
 
.
Most of them are cut out of context or his own views but that doesnt mean he wanted everybody to forget Islam, if he wanted so then he wouldnt allow a religion ministry thats funding all the mosques and imams in the country.
He wont choose Istiklal Marsi full of religious references for our hymn.
He wont choose a Ottoman Flag thats still our flag till today.

Or you wont hear this message from Atatürk that Erdogan is reading below.


Lets say he was atheist, even then it doesnt mean he wanted to erase Islam, and believe me if he wanted we'd know it better today.

My fellow Türk, these statements are very clear signs of his anti-Islamic views. You have much more. You can also read the full contexts of his words, "Araplarin dini Türkleri mahvetti" is enough. But there are much more. Anyhow, as I stated, I don't give the tiniest fraction of a dime of what religion or none-religion he belongs to, but the anti-Islamic activity he was involved in is something I'll never respect nor tolerate. Not that I'm a very good follower of Islam myself, but restricting the freedom of belief to high extents is something I won't tolerate - especially in this century.

It's amusing you are talking about the poet whom wrote our national hymn. This very same man (M. Akif Ersoy) wrote very harsh words to Atatürk - when Atatürk wanted him to somewhat demonize the Ottoman Empire. Here are his words to Atatürk as a response:

Zulmü alkışlayamam, zalimi asla sevemem;
Gelenin keyfi için geçmişe kalkıp sövemem.
Biri ecdadıma saldırdımı,hatta boğarım!…
-Boğamazsın ki!
-Hiçolmazsa yanımdan kovarım.
Üç buçuk soysuzun ardından zağarlık yapamam;
Hele hak namına haksızlığa ölsem tapamam.
Doğduğumdan beridir, aşığım istiklale;
Bana hiç tasmalık etmiş değil altın lale!
Yumuşak başlı isem, kim dedi uysal koyunum
Kesilir belki, fakat çekmeye gelmez boyunum!
Kanayan bir yara gördümmü yanar ta ciğerim,
Onu dindirmek için kamçı yerim, çifte yerim!
Adam aldırmada geç git, diyemem aldırırım.
Çiğnerim, çiğnenirim, hakkı tutar kaldırırım!
Zalimin hasmıyım amma severim mazlumu…
İrticanın şu sizin lehçede ma’nası bu mu?

I don't like to watch Erdogan's video. I know roughly what he might be talking about. I can say that a man of that position will serve more good to himself and to his country's unity if he praises the man who found the republic of Turkey.

And for the record, I repeated this several times on other posts as well - I am not a full-die-hard hater of Mr. Kamal Atatürk, I do respect some revolutions he did, which was necessary, but I also acknowledge many faulties he committed - and which is the sole reason of the "Kurdish problem" the leftists and rightists fights in the past (and present) and much more. We just need to learn from the mistakes in our history, that's the hardest acknowledgement but it will give us the greatest wisdom.

*Ps. And can the Turkish members give us a idea of what percentage in Turkey would subscribe to @Zulkarneyn views?

My plausible guess would be somewhere between 35-45%

Today you have AKP getting almost 50%, most of in which would share the basic ideas of what Zulkarneyn stated but not every single one. Since you have some leftists who'd vote AKP as well due to their many years of successful rule.
 
.
My plausible guess would be somewhere between 35-45%
If so Turkey literally stands on the crossroads. A few more per cents either way will consummate Kemalism or begin change in laying a more balanced state. Interesting times ahead.

My own guess is Kemalist will win. With even 45% you have the magnet of the entire West pulling the other 55%. In tandem with that large chunks of the elite inside Turkey is Kemalists. What you see today might be the last gasps of a old order or is there still life left in the traditional Turks? We will see.
 
.
@Zulkarneyn @KediKesenFare @Selim I First of all can I say I find the subject of this thread exciting. The issues you raised are profound and will involve all Muslim's from across the world to face at some stage or another. These are crossroads that I find myself familar with. The answers will decide the destiny of a good chunk of humanity.

As a intro I would like to declare that I have been a 'Kemalist' from young age. Indeed when I read about Kemal Ataturk in my 20s I was bought. However over the years as I have got older and in particular last few years perhaps as a function of age and increasingly conservatism that tends to creap in I have began to feel uncomfortable with some of his legacy.

I reiterate I still think Kemal Ataturk was needed for his time and indeed he is great but like a poster mentioned here no human being is infallible.

The problem I see is Kemalism is opposite of Islamism. Both are extremes. The real Gordion knot we need to untangle is how to achieve the balance between the two. I have to admit thus far I have read widely but this goal remain elusive.



And what percentage of people think like you guys (Zulkarneyn/Kedikesenfare) in Turkey? A guess would do. @Baybars Han @xenon54 Your guess also invited please.

Ps. This is great thread and I would ask the mods to please keep it under watch. We could have genuinly interesting discussion here touching some vital contours of life and societies we live in and the role of Islam.

This is a extreme example. Just follow the destruction > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Northumbria_Police_manhunt

Good points, but I think there are many aspects you are missing or is different from Western countries societies secularism to Turkish secularism. Your examples about how having an affair etc is not illegal but is bad, which is true, however thats because of the cultural norms of that country you mentioned. In Turkey such things happen and might even be legal but It happens much much rarer than EU/USA etc. We are still muslims(95+%) and Turkish. Our cultural norms are completely different even though we are secular. Your example is completely got to do with current western non existent honour and proper values.

Now lets come back to this. "The problem I see is Kemalism is opposite of Islamism, Both are extremes. The real Gordion knot we need to untangle is how to achieve the balance between the two.".
Im not a Kemalist, I respect him alot and think he did great things and also some mistakes. I dont worship him but see him as the last "Father of Turks" and a revolutionary leader, and has the highest regard for me next to all other leaders such as Fatih Sultan Mehmet(conquered Istanbul and destroyed rome special page in history), Alp Arslan(led the way for Turks in anatolia after battle of manziker) etc

I would like to give you some more insight as an outsider and dont know inside Turkish politics very well. Erdogan is creating very frictions in the society and pushing them away. Most of the Turkish people are like me, they like Ataturk, they also value our past(Ottomans, Seljuks, Gokturks etc etc), they also are Muslim, but dont practice it too much until they become in their 50s lol. This is the majority of the population, dont matter if they vote for akp,mhp or chp. Now im going to show you the different ideologies. The cancer in our society which came after erdogan. Zulkraneyn ideology is very similar to Fethullan Gulen followers, however only difference is that as Erdogan is in power he has the right to speak louder.

Zulkarneyn- Anti Ataturk thereby naturally anti-secular(its so much in his blood and veins that he lives by it), Islamist, very similar to Fethullan Gulens but the only difference is their fan erdogan is in power. Values mainly Turks that was religious or when religion was important(Ottomans), probably dislikes our history when Turks wasnt muslim Gokturks etc.

Baybars- Likes Ataturk, belives in secularism, Muslim, hate people who relate everything to religion and tries to make everyone live like themselves. Loves Turkish history A to Z.


Now @Kaptaan you tell me who is right or wrong. Basically most of the turkish society thinks like me, be it them whatever party except HDP(PKK political wing).
 
.
If so Turkey literally stands on the crossroads. A few more per cents either way will consummate Kemalism or begin change in laying a more balanced state. Interesting times ahead.
My dear brother, this rate has not changed much since the foundation times of the republic of Turkey. Kemalism has very seldom increased to rates above 30% in the Turkish republic, though they have come to power many times, both due coalitions and coup's.

And still in this very day, the rate of Kemalism in Turkey is somewhere around
25-27%, this was demonstrated in the past many elections. A very stable rate indeed.

One must understand, that Kemalists were on the top of media, military, court, police and presidency in most of Turkish republic history. This has changed to small extents after Erbakan's influence to Turkey, to high extents after Gülens influence to Turkey, and also to high extents after Recep Tayyip Erdogan was elected (in 2002, till today). Now, nor Kemalists nor Erdogan has full controle of the state (media, military, court and police (and more)). But this man has really achieved wonders in a country that was so corrupted by the old and persistent Kemalist structure and lately the very strong Gülenist structure.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom