What's new

English Girls Wearing 'Hijab' 100 Years Ago

Yes, that was the date of the manuscripts found but it was from much earlier. Jesus was fully human. He was not killed at the cross, Judas was instead. Very interesting read.

One of the gospels which is not cannon for Christians today.

Dead Sea Scrolls are also interesting.

Dead Sea Scroll indeed very interesting, it shows earliest Christian faith.

Hijab

ArchAbbessPrSub_03.jpg


1232298_orig.jpg


4dfaae1dfd04629be4812e98b071c85b.jpg


No he was not he just believed that the son and the Holy Spirit are not equal to the father
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism


I don’t follow any sect

And yes Islam of today is not the Islam of Muhammad just how Muslims say the Christianity of today is not what Jesus preached or the Judaism of today is not was Moses brought the same goes to Islam is was dead soon after Muhammad died and the Islam you follow today wether Sunni or Shia is invented by Abbasids

You need to understand that the earliest Quran manuscript ever found is very near Muhammad time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Quranic_manuscripts
 
.
Dead Sea Scroll indeed very interesting, it shows earliest Christian faith.

Hijab

ArchAbbessPrSub_03.jpg


1232298_orig.jpg


4dfaae1dfd04629be4812e98b071c85b.jpg




You need to understand that the earliest Quran manuscript ever found is very near Muhammad time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Quranic_manuscripts
Not some time ago they found one in Yemen that predates Islam it self also these Qurans are not the same Qurans of today the scriptures are very different and no modern Arabic speaker can read or understand them
 
.
Dead Sea Scroll indeed very interesting, it shows earliest Christian faith.

Hijab

ArchAbbessPrSub_03.jpg


1232298_orig.jpg


4dfaae1dfd04629be4812e98b071c85b.jpg




You need to understand that the earliest Quran manuscript ever found is very near Muhammad time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Quranic_manuscripts

The earliest Quran is dated within "Muhammad SAW" time.
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Birmingham_Quran_manuscript

Not some time ago they found one in Yemen that predates Islam it self also these Qurans are not the same Qurans of today the scriptures are very different and no modern Arabic speaker can read or understand them
Not true.
 
. . .
Ok so you ancestors were monkeys good for you but we are sons of Adam.
Well it’s just a typical stupidity from you

First understand the evolution instead of reading what the madrasas monkeys telling

No evolutionist say we are descendants of apes but were share the same common ancestor just how you are not descendants from your cousin but you and your cousin come from a single grandfather that’s what the evolution says
 
.
Hijab is part of the three abrahamic religions and not just the Europeans

Maybe you mean the Niqab and circumcision which are Jewish things who came from the pagans and infiltrated Islam
I meant Hijab
it might have been culture, but as far as Islam is concerned, we can find no evidence which mandates Hijab and/or Niqab
 
. .
My dad lives in a large victorian house built about 1850. In the basement it has pantry, food delivery hatches and gas lamps where the servants will have lived. There is a outhouse which according to deeds was for horse carriage. Clearly a wealthy white English snob lived there when house was built. If he came back alive he would get a heart attack seeing bunch of coloured colonial subjects living in his mansion. Fact is we don't want the world that existed in Britain 100 years ago. We the minorities would get fcuked .... into third class untouchables below even the white working class trash. So please shove the Victorian era ......
Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
100 years ago two men were not allowed to marry one another in the UK. Now they can....
 
.
I meant Hijab
it might have been culture, but as far as Islam is concerned, we can find no evidence which mandates Hijab and/or Niqab
Hijab does exist but not the niqab but anyway they are Jewish things barrowed by Islam
 
. .
.
let us not get into religious discussions here?

I would have a fruitful discussions here
but religious discussions go nowhere
so I rather not

Hijab itself is a religious discussion, no?

I take it as a no, therefore no wonder why you don't believe hijab is necessary.

It all comes back to basics. It is precisely for this very reason that religious discussions need to have a subforum. Pakistan must be educated about Islam.
 
.
Hijab itself is a religious discussion, no?

I take it as a no, therefore no wonder why you don't believe hijab is necessary.

It all comes back to basics. It is precisely for this very reason that religious discussions need to have a subforum. Pakistan must be educated about Islam.
someone posted about Hijab being worn 100 years ago as a cultural thing
I simply stated that it was not part of Islam
you then asked me about Hadith, which is a religious discussion, because it is an integral part of Islam. However hadith are further subdivided in various classifications, the classifications then become part of a broader discussion.
 
.
let us not get into religious discussions here?

So you make a statement/assumption on a matter...and you wish to end it here?
I'm pretty sure you knew that answers will be asked... You aren't new to this game...

I think it's quite an unfair intellectual behavior...
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom