What's new

El-Saud CH-4B downed by Houthis!

Apparently, the one who compares the old picture with an Iraqi drone in order to refute the very recent tweet.

It seems Chinese drones and trolls should be manufactured in the same factory, he?
I guess truth is hard bitter pill for you to swallow and admit your mistake. :lol:

Your further stubborn post only show your stupidity and humiliated your Turkish brother further. :enjoy:
 
.
I guess truth is hard bitter pill for you to swallow and admit your mistake. :lol:

Your further stubborn post only show your stupidity and humiliated your Turkish brother further. :enjoy:

The eye-witness and trained Houthis' report versus your color/shape claim.

We both know whom an average intelligent person to take serious.

Made in China will soon become an antonym for quality, thanks to the effort of Houthis and you.
 
. .
LOL... that‘s obviously not CH4,more like MQ-9 reaper.
View attachment 528256
THIS IS MQ-9
View attachment 528257
THIS IS CH4
View attachment 528258



Chinese trolls should perform better than this one quoted above to make people believe It is US drone instead of Chinese thing but It will not help you to prove things while using an image from 2017 as a source!

Adsız.jpg


It seems Truth always hurt!
Good shot to Chinese drone...

 
.
.
Chinese trolls should perform better than this one quoted above to make people believe It is US drone instead of Chinese thing but It will not help you to prove things while using an image from 2017 as a source!
LOL... burned much???I quoted that image directly from the twitter in your post
its 2017 because your source story is completely made up fake piece of garbage from that 2017 incident.
WeChat Image_20181224025349.png
SUCH A FACEPALM
Indeed a good shot,kudo to the Houthis!!!:lol:
@Horus @waz @Dubious @The Eagle sir, we have a Turkish MOD here posting fake news from unproved Houthis propaganda twitter account,despite the evidence I present,this member continue to fabricate story and even resort to personal attacks!you might need to save him from further self humiliations!
 
.
LOL... burned much???I quoted that image directly from the twitter in your post
its 2017 because your source story is completely made up fake piece of garbage from that 2017 incident.
View attachment 528317 SUCH A FACEPALM
Indeed a good shot,kudo to the Houthis!!!:lol:
@Horus @waz @Dubious @The Eagle sir, we have a Turkish MOD here posting fake news from unproved Houthis propaganda twitter account,despite the evidence I present,this member continue to fabricate story and even resort to personal attacks!you might need to save him from further self humiliations!


I think you are really dumb, he debunked you for your fake photo of 2017 and yet you talk you made a point? This is trolling at the max level, you are worst of the worst. PDF is turning in to Chinese Troll factory, they should do something against other whise we will see low post like this.

You are the one with claiming that it not a chinese drone, and he debunked you thats the fact and ther is no need for mods ore admin to look at it.
 
.
Well they are crap and look to nice sunny day, they are not capable to operate from high altitude. Thats why our CATS are superior with combination SAR radar Anka is far beter then that chinese drone:-).


I have a nephew working in the army, he have talk with some operators of anka. They told him when a Anka operate they stay always distance of 25 km away. Aselflir have a range of sight something like that he told me, is 30 km. That was a standard Anka block I. Wo nows what the next generation CATS are capable.
Pardon my confusion, but do they stay away because it can fall out of the sky on them or is it because the people operating them are the targets?
 
.
Pardon my confusion, but do they stay away because it can fall out of the sky on them or is it because the people operating them are the targets?


If they fly low altitude people will notice the drone and the rest is easy target. A MANPADS will do the job.
 
.
LOL... burned much???I quoted that image directly from the twitter in your post
its 2017 because your source story is completely made up fake piece of garbage from that 2017 incident.
View attachment 528317 SUCH A FACEPALM
Indeed a good shot,kudo to the Houthis!!!:lol:
@Horus @waz @Dubious @The Eagle sir, we have a Turkish MOD here posting fake news from unproved Houthis propaganda twitter account,despite the evidence I present,this member continue to fabricate story and even resort to personal attacks!you might need to save him from further self humiliations!


Only thing which is fake here is you and your excuses. The twitter accounts forwarding original posts are collecting the image all around net to attract attention for their news and You, troll receive one of their image and come to a result to justify the situation to spread your fake propaganda while accusing all who share it. The video is revealed by Housthis and They are underlined that It is Chinese CH-4B. Rest is your assumption and nonsense.
 
. .

The only thing which is survived from downed drone is the wing. Rest is burnt down. Take a look at flashing of wing now !

Adsız.png


and Take a look at CH-4B wing end flashing now !
Wraps-lifted-off-Jordans-armed-UAV-_SOFEX18D2_.jpg



and compare it with Reaper, troll.
article-2134376-12BD7D62000005DC-511_964x480.jpg


and Predator
article_bombsniffing-1170x658.jpg



A delusional fanboy is trying to teach me How should I post a military related thread in this forum while judging my moderation with a simple mindset which is totally closed by propaganda. Now, Go your own humiliation way !
 
Last edited:
.
LOL... burned much???I quoted that image directly from the twitter in your post
its 2017 because your source story is completely made up fake piece of garbage from that 2017 incident.
View attachment 528317 SUCH A FACEPALM
Indeed a good shot,kudo to the Houthis!!!:lol:
@Horus @waz @Dubious @The Eagle sir, we have a Turkish MOD here posting fake news from unproved Houthis propaganda twitter account,despite the evidence I present,this member continue to fabricate story and even resort to personal attacks!you might need to save him from further self humiliations!

Dear troll,

The media always uses archieve photos(if current one not available at the time) to illustrate the situation visually to back up the text. This is almost common sense in the world, but apparently not in China.

The tweet does mention about the down of Chinese drone by houtis and refer it to the reports of Houtis; no claim on the photos over/under the text by the twitter owner, nor houthis.

However, Houthis literally say they shot down the Chinese drone. The simple logic accepts that Houthis report is more credible than some cheap trolling of yours, like chinese defence industry.

Houthis: 1 - ''Mighty'' China: 0

P.S: Even China's close friend Mullahs agency says ''Yemeni air defense forces and their allies shot down the Chinese-made CH-4 combat drone with a surface-to-air missile on Sunday afternoon.''
The source: https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018...ept-shoot-down-Saudiled-combat-drone-in-Saada
 
Last edited:
.
I don't know why everyone get on it...
KSA doesn't operate Reapers drone...

So...The Answer is simple... If it's Saudi... it's CH-4...
If it's US... It's reaper...

But according to what is left... that's a CH-4...
CH-4s Wingtip...
 
.
If the ch4 had a flir like the Aselflir300 wouldn't be shot down, look the range of 28km and still sharp:-). Test video of anka...

 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom