Kaiser
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2005
- Messages
- 740
- Reaction score
- 0
The PAF is set to recieve up to 7 SAAB 2000 'Erieye' AEW&C aircraft for use to solve current shortages in early warning systems. The deal, which is the biggest transfer of technology arrangement with Sweden involves 16 aircraft (9 for PIA) & 7 radar systems that will facilitate the PAF's ability to monitor & regulate its airspace. Deliveries are expected to commence at around 2007/2008 (Know 2006 cause of Quake) & to be complete by 2009.
However, there could be other implications for the PAF, specifically of what aircraft should be purchased to compliment the type. Current projections show a PAF preference for the F-16C/D Block 52 based on operational experience with the previous F-16A/B & owing to the current friendly atmosphere between Washington & Islamabad. However, this cost and benefit analysis simply ignores the US penchant for sanctioning Pakistan without solid foundation.
Likewise, the PAF's JF-17 (FC-1) project continues to be delayed as development of a Chinese propullsion system is ongoing & the type undergoes a major re-design pending service. It's been acknowledged that the new rehashed JF-17 based on dipictions of prototype 04 will become the standard production model & a much more capable (& perhaps more expensive) aircraft than initially predicted. However, this has only resulted in raising the demand for an advanced fighter to prevent a 'capability overlap' between the relatively lower end JF-17 & advanced front line aircraft.
Whatever the choice, combined with the superlative capabilities of the SAAB/Ericsson Erieye airborne system will produce a conventional capabilities platform greater than that of simply using current finances to purchase more fighters. While the PAF could have been expected to make a purchase the JAS-39C/D 'Gripen' (already intergrated into Sweden's air defence system in conjunction with the SAAB Erieye) the main constraint appears to be Sweden's refusal to sell Pakistan offensive weaponry to a 'waring' state whereas the Swedish government has apparently accepted Pakistan's case as being a 'defensive' platform.
In the meantime, the SAAB Erieye will facilitate Pakistan's ability to detect ariel & ground targets from greater ranges. The SAAB 2000/Erieye has a detection range of 300km against fighter sized targets & low level intruders. This nullifies BVS strike aircraft (such as the Jaguar or MiG-27) previous advantage where low-level penetration remained their best bet & much more difficult for the PAF to detect & respond to. Combined with a BVR weapon (on new fighters) Indian military planners would have to develop new tactics where previous case scenarios offered a much wider chance of success.
In addition, the situational awareness of interceptors could be greatly facilitated. While current GCI (Ground Control Intercept) stations provide coverage they remain dispersed, static, & vulnerable to stand off jamming. Additionally, a further problem remains difficult in co-ordinating between various GCI stations whereas an AEW&C platform provides more flexible arrangements. The main disadvantage however, is its vulnerable to CAP aircraft.
However, there could be other implications for the PAF, specifically of what aircraft should be purchased to compliment the type. Current projections show a PAF preference for the F-16C/D Block 52 based on operational experience with the previous F-16A/B & owing to the current friendly atmosphere between Washington & Islamabad. However, this cost and benefit analysis simply ignores the US penchant for sanctioning Pakistan without solid foundation.
Likewise, the PAF's JF-17 (FC-1) project continues to be delayed as development of a Chinese propullsion system is ongoing & the type undergoes a major re-design pending service. It's been acknowledged that the new rehashed JF-17 based on dipictions of prototype 04 will become the standard production model & a much more capable (& perhaps more expensive) aircraft than initially predicted. However, this has only resulted in raising the demand for an advanced fighter to prevent a 'capability overlap' between the relatively lower end JF-17 & advanced front line aircraft.
Whatever the choice, combined with the superlative capabilities of the SAAB/Ericsson Erieye airborne system will produce a conventional capabilities platform greater than that of simply using current finances to purchase more fighters. While the PAF could have been expected to make a purchase the JAS-39C/D 'Gripen' (already intergrated into Sweden's air defence system in conjunction with the SAAB Erieye) the main constraint appears to be Sweden's refusal to sell Pakistan offensive weaponry to a 'waring' state whereas the Swedish government has apparently accepted Pakistan's case as being a 'defensive' platform.
In the meantime, the SAAB Erieye will facilitate Pakistan's ability to detect ariel & ground targets from greater ranges. The SAAB 2000/Erieye has a detection range of 300km against fighter sized targets & low level intruders. This nullifies BVS strike aircraft (such as the Jaguar or MiG-27) previous advantage where low-level penetration remained their best bet & much more difficult for the PAF to detect & respond to. Combined with a BVR weapon (on new fighters) Indian military planners would have to develop new tactics where previous case scenarios offered a much wider chance of success.
In addition, the situational awareness of interceptors could be greatly facilitated. While current GCI (Ground Control Intercept) stations provide coverage they remain dispersed, static, & vulnerable to stand off jamming. Additionally, a further problem remains difficult in co-ordinating between various GCI stations whereas an AEW&C platform provides more flexible arrangements. The main disadvantage however, is its vulnerable to CAP aircraft.