Gomig-21
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
- Messages
- 7,901
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
lol.you don’t have any offensive and defensively offensive military capability such as airbase or tank fleets deployed in sinai.israel only allowed you to deploy infantry to fight isis.btw why Pakistan will launch missiles to israel.Pakistan don’t have any quarrel with israel.still Pakistan never recognise Israel.but you egyptian recognise them.you are the one who started fight with israrel.if you didn’t attack israel than east Jerusalem will still be at the hands of muslims.you betrayed Palestine and jordan.
STFU!!!!
When you turn 14 years old and much ,more knowledgeable and informative about the history of those s[pecial wars, maybe, JUST MAYBE THEN we'll give you the time of day. Until then S-T-F-U since you have 0 clue about anything being discussed and are full of hate for Egypt and Egyptians and it won't be tolerated. Like I said, I could give two rats a$$es if this or any of the stuff I say gets me banned. We need contributions -- even negative ones -- from people with brains not brawn.
What we need to do is like what many others here suggested and that is to even hire outside engineers to help develop our own that are just or almost as good, If the Chinese are willing to get paid to go that, then that would be the best way to go.
Hey @The SC , could you do me a small favor unless it's a huge hassle and don't spend too much time on iot, but could you kindly find that incredible Chinese common pylon for any type of missile, be it western (US or ERUO), Russian or of course Chinese and either link the thread you opened or the article. That will raise many people's hairs.
I thought you were getting Meteor
Maybe in our wet dreams, dear Foinikas my brother. Not even out regular dreams, maybe in our WET ones that are soaking the entire mattress. They'll never give us those killers (did you see the technical capabilities of those missiles, bro?) Just the loitering and dual link capability to change target incase if was the wrond one for some reason. If you read the tchno sheet, it puts the AIM-120D, not even the C-5 or C-7 to child's play.
Some rumors saying that we are trying to get Chinese BVR missiles to mount them on aircrafts but those rumors you must take it with a pinch of salt because we don't have any aircrafts that carry them unless we buy from an aircraft and huge number of missile to have a local production.
That might be out only option and pay them to allow us to open one up and see the makeup and decide if we need to make our own changes and start a VERY HEAVY relationship with them since perhaps, just maybe perhaps there is no CAATSA with them and we could have the Russian send the remaining SU-35s to China and then pretend we bought them through them since the US screwed everything. I still think a slap on the table in front of the US defense minister to show him and the rest of the US especially that Zionist PIG Biden we mean business and for them to issue CAATSA on a country that has been buying Russian equipment for 3/4 of a decade and still has been buying new system to suddenly threaten its BS is absolutely shameful especially with the treaty we have adhered to for 40 years. We should first start out by kicking the 300,000 or so (I guessed that number) of MFO soldiers from Sinai as a sign that since the treaty will not be respected by the US and the filth next door, them take a little taste of your own medicine you've been getting away with for so many years, now.
What about the Mig-29s?
Yep, those would be the easiest fit except we already have R-77 and supposedly getting R-77-1 RVVSD with the Su-35 but as you see, that's been a royal nightmare so who knows. I know one thing for sure, the last remaining possibility that might encourage the Italians to include the meteors in the package is to make them sign the contract that we will be installing either PL-15 or 17E to make up for it because NO MORE dilution. Let's see what happens then.