Indonesia just order 6 Rafale. 36 Rafales are part of LOI but in my opinion is unlikely to happen.
Ah, ok. I thought they went ahead and accepted the tender for all 36.
The order will likely take place just to complete the number of plane into 12-16 planes, which is the normal number of planes for 1 squadron in Indonesia.
Yep, same with the EAF. Despite having close to 400 combat aircraft, they still prefer to have a low number within each squadron, even the 180+ F-16s. I think this was a product influenced by the disaster of 1967, they can spread them out more.
Glad you posted here. You made me think; a couple of weeks ago, I was correcting a member in the J-20 thread about the term "squadrons" when he was referring to them as "regiments". While there is some truth to using that term for labeling air force groups, but it's not really as commonly used as "squadrons" in air forces. I also mentioned that there are usually between 12 and 24 aircraft within a squadron, depending on which country etc. Then he asked me how many aircraft in an EAF squadron, to which I replied '12.' Simple question and simple answer followed by a return question by me; I asked him how many in a Indian IAF squadron since they have a huge number of aircraft, He was obviously from India. I figured it would be at least around 20 per. He said 18 (I think) and we were done, ready to move on BUT then suddenly the moderator from Germany jumped in like some maniac bull in a China shop, high on some type of speed mixed with acid/mushroom or something lolzo......and proceeded to take a full blown nutty, posting some eeeh awwwn donkey dung about if we wanted to discuss the EAF and IAF, to not do it on the J-20 thread!
A couple of lousy, harmless, one-liner posts that were the result of discussing the number of J-20s in a squadron and the correct term for those squadrons! This guy almost had an aneurism, compounded by a heart attack! I couldn't believe the overreaction to something so minor, especially when he added a couple of insulting emojis at the end of his dribble. I tell ya, that guy is a basket case, not to mention VERY poor mod skills & qualities who certainly can't lead by example.
No wonder that thread is almost dead. He should be stripped of that responsibility and it given to YOU, someone who's extremely respected) who's also a think tank who actually knows a lot about military topics which we can't really say the same about the majority of the other TTs around this insane asylum lol. Or someone else like
@LeGenD for example, (now there's a respectable moderator) who's firm but fair and level-headed like you, not insanely psychotic and disrespectful.
But you came to mind first from this civilized and informative discussion. I couldn't imagine having such a sane, respectable dialogue with that other crazed & disrespectful individual.
Anyway, anyone following this thread know what is terribly wrong in this photo? When I first saw it a while back, I was extremely disappointed to see the 2 terrible things that are completely wrong in basic military. Let's see how fast anyone can point them out.
@Indos ,
The Su-30s in the MAF are also in a relatively low number like you mentioned and I wanted to ask you, was it the same reason (we really don't know this for sure. but it seems pretty obvious as the EAF quite possibly having cancelled its order of 30-40 Su-35s because they're going to purchase F-15 EXs instead? The US has possibly approved up to 40 F-15 EXs for the EAF, but I'm 100% positive it would never give or sell old or brand new F-15s to any country, regardless of its close ties, while they were also purchasing the veritable Su-35S. Is that the same story or is it strictly because of the 6 Rafales ordered instead, like you mentioned?