What's new

Egypt Islamists attack Iran’s chargé d’affaires’ house, chant anti-Shiite..

You know, I have no problem with Iranians nor Israelis here .........

You know, desperation doesn't help anybody. Try to say something constructive, do something constructive, it might help you increase your self-worth.

Till then, :wave: .
 
. . . .
As far as i know, some of the Indians are also called aryans but that isn't the topic here and it has nothing to do with the point i'm trying to make :)

I've actually studied hitler's pseudo-science at university level world history. nothing gave the professor and our whole class more laughs than mein kampf and the 'scientific publications' of his stooges. they actually considered slavs at a later point to be non-aryans worthy of being gassed along with jews (which they did), even though slavs, especially of poland, share much closer ethnicity and genetic make up with germans than any middle eastern people.

he even ended up assigning the 'aryan' tag to some balkan peoples simply because they were good at soccer (lmao!) or their dictators aligned militarily with the reich. similarly, iran's exemption from nurembourg was because they were allies in name, not for any genuine impression of them being 'aryans' (however innacurately interpreted the word was).

but just think about it, southern germans and polish people share almost exactly the same anthropological history and genetics, yet this austrian jew called hitler considered them an inferior race whilst iran (who by then had heavily mixed with arabs/turkic and other non indo-european groups) was pure? lmfao is all i can say.

his childish and laughable logic aside, the use of aryan was also a great disservice to the history and cultures of proto-indo-iranians. The remnants of any 'aryan culture' passed down can only be found amongst the zoroastrian peoples of khorasan, and some vedic descendants such as religious kashmiri pundits and other groups scattered through the himalayas. 'aryan' just meant a noble, highly esteemed person during the avestan/vedic period about four thousand years ago. it had nothing to do with 'race' or any other such modern machination.
 
.
I've actually studied hitler's pseudo-science at university level world history. nothing gave the professor and our whole class more laughs than mein kampf and the 'scientific publications' of his stooges. they actually considered slavs at a later point to be non-aryans worthy of being gassed along with jews (which they did), even though slavs, especially of poland, share much closer ethnicity and genetic make up with germans than any middle eastern people.

he even ended up assigning the 'aryan' tag to some balkan peoples simply because they were good at soccer (lmao!) or their dictators aligned militarily with the reich. similarly, iran's exemption from nurembourg was because they were allies in name, not for any genuine impression of them being 'aryans' (however innacurately interpreted the word was).

but just think about it, southern germans and polish people share almost exactly the same anthropological history and genetics, yet this austrian jew called hitler considered them an inferior race whilst iran (who by then had heavily mixed with arabs/turkic and other non indo-european groups) was pure? lmfao is all i can say.

his childish and laughable logic aside, the use of aryan was also a great disservice to the history and cultures of proto-indo-iranians. The remnants of any 'aryan culture' passed down can only be found amongst the zoroastrian peoples of khorasan, and some vedic descendants such as religious kashmiri pundits and other groups scattered through the himalayas. 'aryan' just meant a noble, highly esteemed person during the avestan/vedic period about four thousand years ago. it had nothing to do with 'race' or any other such modern machination.

Good luck with telling those to Iranian fanboys here mate. Whenever a country's economy is in downfall, all of a sudden, these little 'Aryans' pops up out of nowhere. Golden Dawn in Greece, and these kids with Hitler's avatar in Iran... It isn't surprising really.
 
. .
It isn't a recent phenomena. Iranians always have looked favorably towards Hitler. Because Hitler always showed respect towards Iran and spoke highly of our culture and history. Also Iranians really hate British and Americans for their meddling, so there is a sense of nostalgia over "what could have been" if Hitler won the war and Britain/US weren't around to meddle in Iranian politics.

Our Indian friend here has explained the reasons of his 'sympathy' towards Iran. Let alone taking pride from the love and respect of a psycopath like Hitler, i would have considered it a shame if i were you. Just sayin...
 
.
He used to be Sunni, then Shia then a Jew. And no I'm not joking, I was banned several times over calling him non-Muslim because it was obvious.

Are you joking or simply too high on glue?

good boy. how did you get that?

I sampled your post with my idiotometer and it went bezerk thats when I knew it!
 
.
Stop whining and wake up. Iran existed before 79 and had fine relations with Arab countries.
After the revolution, Iran foolishly & naively called for Iraqi Shias to revolt and establish A Shia state, which for obvious reasons forced Saddam to declare war. When Iran stops sponsoring terrorist paramilitary militias in our countries, then and only then relations might improve, but that's not going to happen with the current regime in Iran.

GOD bless troll.
 
. .
GOD bless troll.

there is some truth to his post though "revolt" is a strong term

i would have just worded it as "wrestling for influence via sectarian similiarities"

Iran does exactly what the Saudis are doing.
 
.
He used to be Sunni, then Shia then a Jew. And no I'm not joking, I was banned several times over calling him non-Muslim because it was obvious.

Lol, I would've thought getting banned 10 times taught you some lessons of life... But they say, a dog's tail never straightens. Still the same.
 
.
there is some truth to his post though "revolt" is a strong term

i would have just worded it as "wrestling for influence via sectarian similiarities"

Iran does exactly what the Saudis are doing.

Indeed thats why i say no smart muslim should take part in this retarted influence game and destroy his/her country via secterian hatred , both of them same ****.
 
.
I don't know about Iraq but Shi'ites in Pakistan did become very restive. Plus Khomeni did incite them.

Not really. They didn't provide intel or serve the interests of a foreign govt

Rhetoric among the fanatics may have been there after Irans "revolution" but there never has been a Shiia revolt or insurrection in Pakistan. In fact there never has been a revolt against Pakistan on any sectarian lines - majority or minority. Not even close. If I'm wrong I hope I am corrected

I must say that I do look down upon those whose loyalties are to other countries and not their own

Indeed thats why i say no smart muslim should take part in this retarted influence game and destroy his/her country via secterian hatred , both of them same ****.

I agree but unfortunately there are some brainwashed under-employed losers who are mental slaves who can't think freely or sanely.

No shortage of them
 
.
Back
Top Bottom