The creation of Muslim vatican under the auspice of the ICC is a viable alternative to curb the extremism exported by the Wahabism..
Removing Mecca and Medina from Saudi Arabia jurisdiction, a vital necessity for the Muslim world.
Mecca and Medina, the two main Muslim holy cities should they leave the bosom of Saudi influence and become independent entities in this realm? This is a question that should be asked every Muslim witness or victim of massacres committed by armed Islamists from Algeria of the 1990s, through Al-Qaeda of Osama bin Laden in the Islamic State currently wreaking havoc in Iraq and Syria.
Indeed, by its doctrine and its literalist interpretation of the Quran, Wahhabism official doctrine of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia has become the matrix of all the Muslim fundamentalist movements, inter-Muslim driving the civil war. A fight that pitted the forces of extremism and moderate forces represented by those who are not Wahhabi persuasion.
Therefore, every Muslim bound for Mecca and Medina, must say that the money spent in these two holy cities could fund the radical preachers, or even terrorist acts, which Muslims are the first and the main victims. The paradox is that in Saudi Wahhabi preaching mercy for Muslims to fund and preach their death in reality.Moreover, critics about it abound, like the last
section of the former French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, who accuses the Wahhabi kingdom to play a dangerous game in the Middle East.
Often to fight against this extremism, intellectuals condemn the actions of radical preachers, write articles, opting in the bottom for a defensive strategy. Indeed, through actions in the territories intellectually assaulted by fundamentalists, it only delays the inevitable, because as the information and education can be a good way to fight against fundamentalism, it remains subject to the competition posted on social networks and other TV shows, funded by petrodollars videos.
In an Arab world where scientific methods of authentication research and understanding of the texts are missing, explain the difference between Maliki and Wahhabi doctrine is impossible. Just a video of a Saudi cleric, with as wallpaper, Medina and Mecca to replace the seals in Wahhabism, suggesting that he is the true Islam.
It is therefore necessary to adopt a more aggressive strategy intellectually and try to evade this doctrine legitimacy, which is the Mecca and Medina. Indeed, why is it that Wahhabism that can be quantified in a little more than the population of Saudi Arabia, or at the most 30 to 40 million people, would be the official doctrine of the holy cities that are supposed represent more than 1.6 billion Muslims? Why is it that Maliki, and other chafiite should accommodate a minority doctrine in the Muslim world?
Request that the holy cities of Mecca and Medina are independent and run by a collegiate organization that would represent the majority of Muslims would therefore remove this legitimacy is given Wahhabism, limiting the symbolic power of the fundamentalist branch. It would require probably Saudi Arabia to play a more defensive role and why not give these two holy cities.
HuffPost Maghreb.
