Editorial: Quetta Massacre, Attack on Our Integrity | PKKH.tv
PKKH Editorial
Protest against the Saturday Quetta massacre has proceeded throughout the country for 3 days, with boxes of the dead laid in the open, questioning morality from a deep trench. The air is filled with remorse, grief and skepticism, and the mourning is vigil in the hearts that cohere with the human element and connect the death of a distant brother with that of one very close to them, some time ago. But for those who cannot look at it except for body-count and agenda-stirring, there is no connection only point-scoring.
Coming to connection;the human community, however defected it may seem to be, is assembled from the onset on the sharing of a worldview between a group of people, uniting them in the subconscious as one people, wherein they will keep finding the connection in all variations, wherein individuals proceed in their livelihoods in a collective air of security and unity; for if this air is snatched away and filled in with fear and insecurity, and the very worldview that unites this people is maligned and put to question, that is a time when society is being prepared for disintegration.
And now seems to be the time, as proponents of dissent anddivide are at their full force to create all sorts of negativity that could possibly debase the force that keeps us united. The mainstream news channels are playing their part in enhancing the Shia Sunni divide, they who never tire from raising the slogans of democracy, are now feeding the minds for armed intervention in Quetta, an onslaught of writings is being launched in all mainstream newspapers that never miss joining the most heinous of all acts somehow with Islam. Here is their basic web: Islam glorifies Jehad, which inevitably creates extremist ideology, which originate in the form of terror organizations, who want to impose the true Islam, which is an extremist religion, therefore a moderate Islam has to be defined, keeping in view the Liberal stance, which will takes us to modernism and progress, so that the extremist element are destroyed by changing our worldview, while we should be accepting the fact that it is not possible to eliminate the terrorists with bullet or talk, as they are an inbred and recurringphenomenon of any Islamic society, because it not that the terrorist are between the Muslims but in reality the Muslims are terrorist.
This is totally opposed to the consensus of the majority which still upholds the unity it casts from a worldview, it dearly believes in, i.e. Islam. A worldview which can only be upheld, starting with Islam is the moderate worldview, it preaches love for all, it fights against those who destruct unity, it give out the light of knowledge, progress and the highest morals, therefore it cannot inbreed terrorism, terrorism has to be an external element, it has to countered with battle, policing and deterrence, terrorism cannot be moderated or rehabilitated within our borders, it has to be distinctly identified and exterminated, it cannot be called Muslim. Islam and the Muslims have to stay in this country and the terrorist and those who use their acts to malign us have to go.
How do they work with skepticism? Skepticism is cultured by a simple technique: like in the scientific community when a matter of interest comes to light, several theories are floated to explain it, but care is taken that these theories be effectively countered by experimentation and rigorous analysis, so that soon most theories are thrown into trash and only the best fewremain, out of which one or two will be winning the consensus of the scientific community, thereby clearing confusion and maintaining a fair amount of belief on Science as a whole. But if several theories just remain in the air with no analysis and no discarding, what will happen is that there will be an air of confusion, leading to disbelief on the very authenticity of science itself.
So if we are to float, inside our society, 20 theories proposing how, where and when Islam is wrong, impractical or even harmful, in the name of freedom of speech and expression, and there is no system or authority to discard or eliminate any of these theories, an air of confusion will be built, whereby questions will be raised both against and for such theories, in an utterly indecisive people. So it ends up as a total win win for the Liberals, who need not feel any burden of proof, but all they need to do is incite doubt, more and more into the society, so that in time there will be a change of heart and Islam will be facing a democratically equal rival in the very ground it was previously cherished as the only and the pure choice.
Does the freedom of speech and expression give to a certain rebellious sector of the society, the power to malign and de-construct the belief system and high-morality, which they have taken centuries to conserve? Does a minority, who loves vulgarity, nudity and blasphemy, have equal right on the national information grid as those who love modesty, God-fearing and an infallible worldview.Do the Liberal, change agents, have the right to thief us from our belief in the all-power, merciful, all-hearing and seeing Allah, whom we love so dearly from the roots of our hearts, Who is pure, and so is the unity that is derived from Him and which returns to Him.
No they are not equal, there can be no law that allows equal opportunity to destruction;and it is no justice to give equal vote to modesty and vulgarity; to those who unite and those who divide, to those who mourn terror and those who bank on it. It is not equal to call TTP, BLA, LeJ and the likes as Muslim, Pakistani terrorist organizations, eliminating the possibility of the thought that each one of them is backed by intelligence agencies of enemy countries, and that they are really another names for RAW, MOSSAD, CIA and the likes.
Here at PKKH, we intensely feel the attack of variant theories on our subjective integrity, aimed to move our collective thought from belief to skepticism. We have been divided to be ruled upon before, but as the Imperialistsbecome more technical, they aim to divide us now from our very root; with no boots on ground but only foot-prints of their ghostly presence. They bomb us from remote control, and they use our bodies as human shields to protect and enhance their interests. We are firm that those who are at wars with our faith in the battle of words and those who explode our bodies with bombs, are one and aide of each other.
Source
PKKH Editorial
Protest against the Saturday Quetta massacre has proceeded throughout the country for 3 days, with boxes of the dead laid in the open, questioning morality from a deep trench. The air is filled with remorse, grief and skepticism, and the mourning is vigil in the hearts that cohere with the human element and connect the death of a distant brother with that of one very close to them, some time ago. But for those who cannot look at it except for body-count and agenda-stirring, there is no connection only point-scoring.
Coming to connection;the human community, however defected it may seem to be, is assembled from the onset on the sharing of a worldview between a group of people, uniting them in the subconscious as one people, wherein they will keep finding the connection in all variations, wherein individuals proceed in their livelihoods in a collective air of security and unity; for if this air is snatched away and filled in with fear and insecurity, and the very worldview that unites this people is maligned and put to question, that is a time when society is being prepared for disintegration.
And now seems to be the time, as proponents of dissent anddivide are at their full force to create all sorts of negativity that could possibly debase the force that keeps us united. The mainstream news channels are playing their part in enhancing the Shia Sunni divide, they who never tire from raising the slogans of democracy, are now feeding the minds for armed intervention in Quetta, an onslaught of writings is being launched in all mainstream newspapers that never miss joining the most heinous of all acts somehow with Islam. Here is their basic web: Islam glorifies Jehad, which inevitably creates extremist ideology, which originate in the form of terror organizations, who want to impose the true Islam, which is an extremist religion, therefore a moderate Islam has to be defined, keeping in view the Liberal stance, which will takes us to modernism and progress, so that the extremist element are destroyed by changing our worldview, while we should be accepting the fact that it is not possible to eliminate the terrorists with bullet or talk, as they are an inbred and recurringphenomenon of any Islamic society, because it not that the terrorist are between the Muslims but in reality the Muslims are terrorist.
This is totally opposed to the consensus of the majority which still upholds the unity it casts from a worldview, it dearly believes in, i.e. Islam. A worldview which can only be upheld, starting with Islam is the moderate worldview, it preaches love for all, it fights against those who destruct unity, it give out the light of knowledge, progress and the highest morals, therefore it cannot inbreed terrorism, terrorism has to be an external element, it has to countered with battle, policing and deterrence, terrorism cannot be moderated or rehabilitated within our borders, it has to be distinctly identified and exterminated, it cannot be called Muslim. Islam and the Muslims have to stay in this country and the terrorist and those who use their acts to malign us have to go.
How do they work with skepticism? Skepticism is cultured by a simple technique: like in the scientific community when a matter of interest comes to light, several theories are floated to explain it, but care is taken that these theories be effectively countered by experimentation and rigorous analysis, so that soon most theories are thrown into trash and only the best fewremain, out of which one or two will be winning the consensus of the scientific community, thereby clearing confusion and maintaining a fair amount of belief on Science as a whole. But if several theories just remain in the air with no analysis and no discarding, what will happen is that there will be an air of confusion, leading to disbelief on the very authenticity of science itself.
So if we are to float, inside our society, 20 theories proposing how, where and when Islam is wrong, impractical or even harmful, in the name of freedom of speech and expression, and there is no system or authority to discard or eliminate any of these theories, an air of confusion will be built, whereby questions will be raised both against and for such theories, in an utterly indecisive people. So it ends up as a total win win for the Liberals, who need not feel any burden of proof, but all they need to do is incite doubt, more and more into the society, so that in time there will be a change of heart and Islam will be facing a democratically equal rival in the very ground it was previously cherished as the only and the pure choice.
Does the freedom of speech and expression give to a certain rebellious sector of the society, the power to malign and de-construct the belief system and high-morality, which they have taken centuries to conserve? Does a minority, who loves vulgarity, nudity and blasphemy, have equal right on the national information grid as those who love modesty, God-fearing and an infallible worldview.Do the Liberal, change agents, have the right to thief us from our belief in the all-power, merciful, all-hearing and seeing Allah, whom we love so dearly from the roots of our hearts, Who is pure, and so is the unity that is derived from Him and which returns to Him.
No they are not equal, there can be no law that allows equal opportunity to destruction;and it is no justice to give equal vote to modesty and vulgarity; to those who unite and those who divide, to those who mourn terror and those who bank on it. It is not equal to call TTP, BLA, LeJ and the likes as Muslim, Pakistani terrorist organizations, eliminating the possibility of the thought that each one of them is backed by intelligence agencies of enemy countries, and that they are really another names for RAW, MOSSAD, CIA and the likes.
Here at PKKH, we intensely feel the attack of variant theories on our subjective integrity, aimed to move our collective thought from belief to skepticism. We have been divided to be ruled upon before, but as the Imperialistsbecome more technical, they aim to divide us now from our very root; with no boots on ground but only foot-prints of their ghostly presence. They bomb us from remote control, and they use our bodies as human shields to protect and enhance their interests. We are firm that those who are at wars with our faith in the battle of words and those who explode our bodies with bombs, are one and aide of each other.
Source
