MastanKhan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 21,269
- Reaction score
- 166
- Country
- Location
True, PAF/PAC did a poor marketing job on a very capable platform; I blame this on the desi mentality of calling anything cheap or discounted it didn't play well into the marketing of this plane. We can fix this issue with Block III and hopefully hire a proper marketing team.
Only issue I had with posters above is their lack of technical knowledge and calling it a trainer plane? No one reputable defense analyst has said anything of the sort, and even if Egyptian AF Personal said it these members should realize their officers hold no weight in giving any analysis. Guess we shouldn't worry about the opinion of sheep.
But as your said for us this plane suits out needs due to our projected theater of war.
Hi,
Regarding the two seater---we created this problem ie the Paf---first they stated we did not need a two seater---our pilots are capable to get into the single seater and fly comfortably---.
When they manufactured the 2 seater---they touted it is a training platform as well and not as a strike platform---.
Again the Paf lowered the expectations of this aircraft out of negligence and incompetence of thought and presentation---.
Now after all this---it would not be easy to present this platform as a strike option---.
So---we cannot blame the egyptians for what they believe in about this aircraft---.