I FLY HIGH
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2010
- Messages
- 1,116
- Reaction score
- 0
this is just a political post only intended to anti pmln campaign and nothing else .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everyone is hopefully how many are practical esp in terms of ground reality and financial status?and all its route will be operational and successfully integrated
Supposed to aid in getting to places and transporting goods = increase accessibility :How will CPEC help pakistan's economy....? That's something I never quite understood. Anyone here know ?
You often criticise without doing proper research as you just hate the Mario brothers inside your heart for unknown/undisclosed reasons.Everyone is hopefully how many are practical esp in terms of ground reality and financial status?
Do I have a reason to like them? Everything they have done so far AFTER SPENDING significant amounts of money, choosing the MOST expensive way and still getting results of choosing a cheaper plan? AMAZING!You often criticise without doing proper research as you just hate the Mario brothers inside your heart for unknown/undisclosed reasons.
True...But it is still not as transparent as IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BEPlease follow the CPEC project, a lot of work has been done in this regard and the pace of construction is faster than most projects ever completed in the history of Pakistan
THAT is a good thing but it has nothing to do with the tinday "road minsters" (only title they deserve to be called) had they more say in it they would have not wasted a brain cell to propose a new road all together!The good thing that they did is they didn't dig out roads from scratch, they used/upgrading the existing network and constructing new roads only where they do not exist. It will save a lot of money and time of the whole nation
yea the "worry" (which the manager is supposed to tweak out) of the rest of the provinces is non of anyone's concern except to ask for gas from Baluchistan or to ask for hydro power plants from KPK and to ask for tax on industries of KarachiThe article published is nothing but a nonsense in my opinion as such articles take a headline for day and die soon after
New Recruit
.Our people fail to understand that the CPEC is not a single road that will extend from point A to point B, it is a complex network of roads that must interconnect through out the country to improve access to production hubs and major domestic markets most of which lie in Punjab and Sindh.
Because these seemingly illiterate masses are not educated by no one. It was/is the job of the government to brief people about the routes. Pervaiz Rasheed the moron has all the time in life to vomit againt IK/PTI, cant he take few minutes and explain masses about the routes?Our people fail to understand that the CPEC is not a single road that will extend from point A to point B, it is a complex network of roads that must interconnect through out the country to improve access to production hubs and major domestic markets most of which lie in Punjab and Sindh.
ISLAMABAD:
By preferring a route that passes through Punjab and Sindh rather than Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, the federal government is artificially inflating the cost of the China-Pakistan economic corridor, to the point where it may become economically unviable, claims a report studying the matter issued by the Balochistan government.
The report, titled “China Pakistan Economic Corridor: The Route Controversy”, addresses what Quetta feels is Islamabad’s lack of consistency on the matter, and its failure to take into account the needs and desires of all federating units of the country. The matter could get politically inconvenient for the federal government, since Balochistan Chief Minister Abdul Malik Baloch’s National Party is an ally of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz.
However, Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal claims that the report is one-sided and did not take into account the views of what he feels is the main stakeholder in CPEC: the federal government.
The report was prepared by the chief minister’s Policy Reform Unit, headed by economist Kaiser Bengali. It analyses the viability of the three CPEC routes based on three parameters: population density, total area under cultivation along the routes and total production of four major crops. These parameters become the base for determining the cost of land acquisition and displacement of population, the socio economic benefits and the environmental impact.
Read: Game changer: Army chief vows to turn economic corridor into reality
Pakistan has identified three routes for Chinese cargo: the eastern alignment (passing mainly through central Punjab and Sindh), the central route (passing partly through Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, and hitherto unconnected parts of Punjab and Sindh) and the western alignment (passing through the relatively underdeveloped areas of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan).
The provincial government claimed that “despite denials the route has been changed to pass through central Punjab”, Islamabad is primarily focusing on the eastern corridor.
The districts along the preferred eastern route are the most densely populated, having large swathes of land under cultivation and is the main source of production of four major crops, according to the report. All these factors will increase the construction cost. By comparison, the western route is thinly populated and the land is mainly barren.
The comparison between the three routes implies that the eastern route is economically unviable, claims the report.
By selecting the eastern route, the government is trading off today’s security risks with provincial discord and political instability in the future, the report stated.
However, Iqbal said that the central route was the shortest one. “The eastern alignment part of Peshawar-Karachi motorway serves the major markets, industrial areas and most populated centres of the country,” said Iqbal. He said the CPEC concept is not to create a “container-in, container-out” economy but rather help make the country a regional manufacturing hub.
Read: China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Lines of development – not lines of divide
The report argues that the pre-existing sections are likely to save time and cost are not tenable, as most sections will have to be widened and re-laid to cater to the volume and load of the traffic.
CPEC trail
The report finds the traces of the CPEC in the mid-2000s when the Planning Commission made a presentation to the then-president Pervez Musharraf and prime minister Shaukat Aziz. It was then called the “Trade, Energy, Transport and Industrial Corridor”. The Musharraf Administration had identified the central route for creating surface transport connectivity between Gwadar and Kashgar in China.
The report also challenged the government’s claim that it will build all the three alignments. “The resources to build all three routes are not available and China would certainly not allocate resources to pander to political disagreements in Pakistan,” it added.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 26th, 2015.
Eastern CPEC route unfeasible: report - The Express Tribune
Supposed to aid in getting to places and transporting goods = increase accessibility :
Yes, Yes.Who says RAW's Disinformation doesnt work. Its so easy for RAW since everyone hates Punjab, just give them only 5 rupee for disinformation and bingo
It depends, our journalists has a habit of criticising pointlessly when they can't even distinguish between 100 billion rupees and 1000 billion rupees. As I said earlier in other threads, half the material that you use in construction is imported from abroad so others can obviously afford to make this infrastructure comparatively cheaper. The corruption is there but not as exaggerated as shown in some newspapers.Do I have a reason to like them? Everything they have done so far AFTER SPENDING significant amounts of money, choosing the MOST expensive way and still getting results of choosing a cheaper plan? AMAZING!
I don't know anybody who claimed that we were receiving a gift. It is of course a loan/investment for China's greater ambition. All Pakistan is doing is reaping the benefit of sharing common goal with China and providing a platform for their own growth. The term gift is only used as a figure of speech1) lie it is a gift when it is a loan so we have to pay back though our industries are already shutting down and some thing that money grows on trees...
There is nothing wrong in it, I am not aware about the Chinese industries being set up in Gwadar but if it does happen it is a great news for Pakistan of course. All the nations in 2015 prosper by foreign investment and exchange of bilateral trade. What we are seeing out of CPEC is2) Pakistan will benefit when most of the work (on Gwadar) will be by Chinese workers and Chinese industries set up there you think people pay to get your people to work rather than theirs? AMAZING MENTALITY!
You know if you had some knowledge of finance or economics you would disagree with your own statement.3) It will benefit Pakistan when in reality there is less chance of benefits and more chance of us being taxed to use our own highways and even land...
I consider it as a rant.yea the "worry" (which the manager is supposed to tweak out) of the rest of the provinces is non of anyone's concern except to ask for gas from Baluchistan or to ask for hydro power plants from KPK and to ask for tax on industries of Karachi
The problem with many of us is that CORRUPTION is such a norm now even more so thanks to JC that we dont feel any need to condemn it....Which mind you is disgusting!The corruption is there but not as exaggerated as shown in some newspapers.
April 21I don't know anybody who claimed that we were receiving a gift.
Well figure of speech doesnt use such a word which has its own meaning contradicting what the real term really is!The term gift is only used as a figure of speech
Yes but NATIONS prosper by their own doing their own industries laws which protect their own not boot lickersThere is nothing wrong in it, I am not aware about the Chinese industries being set up in Gwadar but if it does happen it is a great news for Pakistan of course. All the nations in 2015 prosper by foreign investment and exchange of bilateral trade. What we are seeing out of CPEC is
You think the infrastructure is for us and not them to use? They will use it and you will pay the loan...They will use it and you will be maintaining it for life and paying the loan! Whose winning without a plan?1) China making an investment for its own good which indirectly also means better infrastructure in Pakistan - win win situation for both
How sure are we, the energy will be shared in national circuit? Is it written or assumed?2) China making investment to reduce energy shortfall for Pakistan which also means profit for China - win win situation for both nations
SO is it written OR AGAIN ASSUMED that locals will be employed and not Chinese only workers? You do know around the world people are localizing coz they want to make jobs for their own but in Pakistan we dont even know but are ASSUMING China is making jobs for us! What a laugh!If China does set up industries as you pointed out, it means jobs creation, income tax, customs tax, transportation charges, local and regional employment for Pakistanis and the government.
Instead of writing such statements give me a draft of what you blabbed here that LOCALS WILL BENEFIT coz that is what CPEC is selling as!You know if you had some knowledge of finance or economics you would disagree with your own statement.
BTW, Which nation in the world does not tax highways? There is nothing wrong in that... But the Chinese will also be paying the same tax so another source of income for the government... Nothing wrong in that
Mismanagement is a rant for you? Oh of course it is....Coz you dont see the mismanagement...I couldnt be bothered to read the last para coz there is no use wasting time with a dumb, deaf and blind!I consider it as a rant.
Then what is the use of the federal? Your blind faith for Punjab only is disgusting and suggesting Punjab to be a different country as compared with the other provinces!The deprivation of other provinces is somewhat due to their own incompetency and negligence.
You think China would go to individual provinces to do a national project? Then what is the use of the tind calling itself FEDERAL meaning central meaning in control?While the involvement of Federal Government cannot be ruled out, the provinces are responsible for their own deed at large.
Well when you do bakwas regarding PROVINCIAL role of KPK which is 2.5 yrs not even federal and expect magic...THEN expect magic from 2.5 in federal!When you talk about the Federal Government, 1.5 years x 2 is the tenure of PML-N government during 1990s out of 68 years of history of Pakistan and another 2.5 years during this term so far.
These noons have been hiding behind 18th and 19th amendments coz they themselves couldnt do shit during their provincial roles since forever and expect miracles from KPK....seriously stop playing double roles....if you cant expect something from 1 dont expect from the other....We have seen major improvement and distribution of resources amongst the provinces after 18th and 19th amendment and I wouldn't want to remind about their character of 1990s when they were mere puppies of third power.
During the 1985 general election, a new PML(N) emerged on the country's political scene. The party had supported the presidency of Zia-ul-Haq and won his support to appoints Mohammad Khan Junejo for the office of Prime Minister. Nawaz Sharif had won the favours and support from the President Zia-ul-Haq and approved his appointment as Chief Minister of the Punjab Province in 1985.The most to blame for is PPP which ruled the most followed by Dictators...
Studies? What does that mean?And is there a demand/need for this ?
Where are the feasibility studies ?
Or is it just another one of those things like in N.Korea where USSR kept funding it and when it collapsed, so did N.Korea.....