What's new

Duterte congratulates Trump, wishes ‘enhanced PH-US relations’

No, the electorial college is here because it was difficult to manage countrywide elections 200+ years ago.
There is no reason today, why a simple count of votes should not be used to elect the President.

No bbccdd is right., the electoral system is there to ensure that every state has a say and the presidential elections aren't just about California, New York, and Texas issues.

The US was built on states rights, and that core remains.
 
. . . .
No bbccdd is right., the electoral system is there to ensure that every state has a say and the presidential elections aren't just about California, New York, and Texas issues.

The US was built on states rights, and that core remains.
Since the number of electors is supposed to track the population,
the big states still have more importance.
Currently the elector distribution is updated every 10 years.
Would it be bad, if it was updated before each important election?
Would it be bad if each candidate got his/her share of the electors?

I don't think so.

Right now states with a solid majority, like California gets ignored.
Why should California get much less interest than a 4 elector swing state?
 
.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-usa-rifles-idUSKBN1390DY?il=0

Philippines police boss says U.S. guns deal on after Duterte U-turn

r


The Philippines police will push ahead with the purchase of 26,000 assault rifles from a U.S. supplier, the police chief said on Monday, following an about-face by President Rodrigo Duterte, who previously said the deal would be scrapped.

Duterte had a week ago expressed anger at "fools" and "monkeys" in Washington seeking to block the deal and said he would cancel it himself. But Duterte's police chief said he revoked that decision, apparently after Republican Donald Trump's surprise win in the U.S. presidential election.

"(The president) told me to continue the deal," Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Dela Rosa, told a news conference.

"The processing of documents are going on smoothly ... we have the blessing of the president to continue the transaction."

Dela Rosa did not say why Duterte had changed his mind, but he said there would be a new president in Washington and "he and Donald Trump are friends".

Aides to Ben Cardin, who sits on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, last month said the State Department had been informed Cardin would oppose the deal during the prenotification process, effectively putting the brakes on it.

Cardin was reluctant for the United States to provide weapons to the police given concern about alleged human rights violations in Duterte's war on drugs, which killed 2,300 people in its first four months.

The tough-talking Duterte has been incensed by U.S. concerns about a drugs crackdown he says is needed to save his country from ruin.

He has regularly berated the Obama administration but has expressed a desire to work with Trump.

Dela Rosa said it was possible the president would scrap the guns deal if there were an intervention in Washington.

"If they will block it, I'm sure the president will again tell me to stop it. We're paying for it, we're not begging for it," he said.
 
Last edited:
.
I am confused by Duterte.

He says one thing on one day and does something else the next day.

He certainly makes things interesting.

"he and Donald Trump are friends".

With Trump and Duterte, I expect to see more fireworks.
 
.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-usa-rifles-idUSKBN1390DY?il=0

Philippines police boss says U.S. guns deal on after Duterte U-turn

r


The Philippines police will push ahead with the purchase of 26,000 assault rifles from a U.S. supplier, the police chief said on Monday, following an about-face by President Rodrigo Duterte, who previously said the deal would be scrapped.

Duterte had a week ago expressed anger at "fools" and "monkeys" in Washington seeking to block the deal and said he would cancel it himself. But Duterte's police chief said he revoked that decision, apparently after Republican Donald Trump's surprise win in the U.S. presidential election.

"(The president) told me to continue the deal," Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Dela Rosa, told a news conference.

"The processing of documents are going on smoothly ... we have the blessing of the president to continue the transaction."

Dela Rosa did not say why Duterte had changed his mind, but he said there would be a new president in Washington and "he and Donald Trump are friends".

Aides to Ben Cardin, who sits on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, last month said the State Department had been informed Cardin would oppose the deal during the prenotification process, effectively putting the brakes on it.

Cardin was reluctant for the United States to provide weapons to the police given concern about alleged human rights violations in Duterte's war on drugs, which killed 2,300 people in its first four months.

The tough-talking Duterte has been incensed by U.S. concerns about a drugs crackdown he says is needed to save his country from ruin.

He has regularly berated the Obama administration but has expressed a desire to work with Trump.

Dela Rosa said it was possible the president would scrap the guns deal if there were an intervention in Washington.

"If they will block it, I'm sure the president will again tell me to stop it. We're paying for it, we're not begging for it," he said.
I dont understand why the U.S is holding back from selling these weapons to an ally like the Philippines. Their companies are making money from this deal and they want to stop it for some silly reason like the fight against drugs and human rights? Lol. How stupid can Obama be.
Trump might bring some sanity to the U.S afterall. :D
 
.
I dont understand why the U.S is holding back from selling these weapons to an ally like the Philippines. Their companies are making money from this deal and they want to stop it for some silly reason like the fight against drugs and human rights? Lol. How stupid can Obama be.
Trump might bring some sanity to the U.S afterall. :D

One word: "Liberals"
 
.
Duterte Says Shift Toward China Will Continue After Trump Win
November 11, 2016 — 9:27 AM CST
800x-1.jpg

President Rodrigo Duterte declared Friday that he would continue to shift the Philippines toward China despite Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election.

At an early morning briefing in Davao, Duterte said that while the U.S. would remain a friend and ally, the Philippines’ foreign policy was now geared toward China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

“I will pursue what I’ve started,” Duterte said following his return from a state visit to Malaysia. “My partnership with China and the rest of Asean will remain. I am not in the habit of reneging on my word.”


Duterte called himself “just a small molecule in the planet” compared with Trump. “He is now president of the most powerful country in the world,” Duterte said. “What we share in common is the passion to serve.”

In a state visit to China last month, Duterte announced a formal “separation” from the U.S. and said he wanted to pivot to China and Russia -- widening a split with his nation’s biggest security ally. Since being sworn in as president in June, Duterte has vowed to end joint military exercises with the U.S., called for American soldiers to leave the southern island of Mindanao, and told President Barack Obama to “go to hell.”

Maintain Cooperation
Even so, with the two countries still bound by several agreements including a mutual defense treaty, Duterte said the Philippines would “maintain our cooperation" with the U.S.

“It is still part of trying to play off the United States against China,” said Segundo Romero, a professorial lecturer in development studies at the Ateneo de Manila University.
“His anti-U.S. stance is a mix of sentiments against country and against its leadership."


In a statement on Wednesday, Duterte said he looked forward to enhancing Philippine-U.S. relations under a future Trump administration, adding that they were “anchored on mutual respect, mutual benefit and shared commitment to democratic ideals and the rule of law.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ft-toward-china-will-continue-after-trump-win
 
.
I can see Duterte-Trump engage in an epic Twitter war. Neither has the patience for decorum and propriety. I'm just waiting to see who throws the first punch.
 
.
I can see Duterte-Trump engage in an epic Twitter war. Neither has the patience for decorum and propriety. I'm just waiting to see who throws the first punch.

Eh? I figure that Trump and Duterte would get along pretty well personality-wise.
 
.
It seems less "shifting toward China" but more like normalize relationship with China after Benigno Aquino fu-ked up.
 
.
Whatever direction(s) Duterte wants to take be it criss cross or pro China attitude, Beijing will be monitoring closely his steps. The worse thing he can do is repeat the same mistakes as Aquino but we know how that has worked out for PH. Not only did they gain nothing from that worthless verdict, it left them a nasty bill and soured the relation with China. PH's economy took a dive :rofl:, no investment from China, no banana export to China. We taught these Pinoys a hard lesson when we prohibited them to fish near OUR Huangyan island. Vietcongs, Indos were hoping for some fireworks in SCS with US but they left them disappointed after the PLA's massive drill.
 
.
WASHINGTON: Neither President Trump’s transition in DC nor President Duterte’s eruptions in Manila will derail America’s 70-year military commitment to the Pacific, Adm. Harry Harris said today. US-Philippine cooperation continues unabated despite Duterte’s denunciation of the alliance, the head of Pacific Command said. (The senior State Department official for the Pacific, Daniel Russel, recently dismissed Duterte’s statements as “a lot of noise” and noted nothing had actually changed despite the Philippine president’s public comments). Despite the turbulence of domestic politics, “America never has a lame duck commander in chief,” Harris said. “I’ll continue to serve President Obama until January 20th, at which point I’ll serve President Trump.

“I want to ease any concerns from our partners and our potential adversaries,” Harris said. “It would be inappropriate for me to speculate on potential policy initiatives of the next administration, (but) that said, I have no doubt we’ll continue our steadfast commitment to our allies and partners in the Indo-Asia-Pacific.”

If foreign partners aren’t reassured, it’s not through any lack of trying on Harris’s part. He’s just sent the USS Sampson to help New Zealand after an earthquake and his personal travel is enough to kill a lesser man. “I was in Vietnam a few weeks ago; Mongolia; Japan; we cohosted the Chiefs of Defense conference in Manila,” Harris said. “I’ll be in Canada…then heading out back to Manila… I’ll go on to Sri Lanka, Papua New Guinea, and Australia.

It’s no accident that the Philippines show up twice. Harris is heading back there Sunday for a major meeting Tuesday to determine US-Philippine joint exercises in 2017. Those exercises might be reduced, he said: “I’ll know more on Tuesday…but I’m optimistic about it.’

So far, “I’m not seeing any slowdown in the Philippines,” Harris said. “What I’ve seen is some statements that, I’ll be frank with you, are concerning to us, to me, coming from the new president there in the Philippines, but despite what he has said there’s been no change in anything with the Philippines, with one exception.” The meeting he’ll attend Tuesday was originally scheduled for last month.

Not only does Harris not fear for the US-Philippine bilateral relationship He sees a promising increase in multilateral cooperation among Pacific countries. The Philippines are working with Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore to counter pirates and terrorists in the often-lawless waters of Southeast Asia. Even Bangladesh is a potential partner in counterterrorist preparations against the return of an estimated 3,000 Islamic State fighters — “That’s a very soft number,” Harris said — from the Mideast to their home countries, Harris said. To the north, South Korea and Japan are slowly overcoming decades of distrust to cooperate with each other and the US against North Korea.

Then there’s China. “I’m concerned about Chinese assertiveness particularly in the South China Sea, but also with the East China Sea,” Harris said. “That said, the mil-to-mil relationship with China, on one level, is actually good.”

Harris has visited China himself and Gen. Robert Brown, the head of US Army Pacific, is there now. US troops have gone to China for major exercises in disaster relief. China has twice sent its “best ships” to the biennial Rim of the Pacific exercise. “They even brought an extra ship in 2014,” laughed Harris, referring to the Chinese spy vessel that monitored RIMPAC ’14, “but they did not do that in 2016… I think that’s good.”

Nevertheless, “what I do as a military commander is I assume the worst…I look through a glass darkly,” Harris said. “That applies to China; that really applies to North Korea.”

Prepare For The Worst

Against North Korea, preparing for the worst means ever increasing emphasis on missile defense: Navy Aegis ships at sea; Army Patriots and, soon; THAAD batteries on land. Against China, it seems to mean putting anti-ship missiles everywhere you can, from Navy Littoral Combat Ships to Army ATACMS batteries ashore.

As a young Cold Warrior aboard the USS Saratoga in the 1980s, Harris recalled, he spent a huge amount of time and worry on the Soviets’ smallest ships. “These are tiny, relatively tiny ships, but we had to track all of them,” Harris said, “because they had Styx (anti-ship) missiles.”

“So they were a threat beyond their size… I want the LCS to be viewed by our adversaries in the region in the same way,” Harris said. (The Navy calls this proliferation of well-armed platforms “distributed lethality“).

Yes, LCS “has had problems,” Harris said, praising the Senate Army Services Committee’s oversight of the program, but he looks forward to it being upgunned with anti-ship weapons.

Likewise, “I think the Army should be in the business of sinking ships with land-based surface-to-ship missile systems,” Harris said. “Other countries do this, Japan has an outstanding system,” while even Houthi rebels in Yemen have launched (unsuccessful) attacks on the US Navy.

“If you put these weapon systems on (islands) in the Western Pacific, they could place at risk potential adversaries in the South China Sea, the East China, Sea of Japan, East Sea, West Sea area, all of that,” Harris said.

“What the Army brings traditionally is what they always bring, which is mass and firepower and capability. What they could bring, which I’ve encouraged the Army to think about, is this idea of cross-domain fires,” Harris said, referring to the emerging Army doctrine called Multi-Domain Battle. Harris’s so enthusiastic he got up at 5am Hawaii time to participate via video in a panel discussion of the new concept at October’s Association of the US Army conference. He will host a major joint exercise to test out Multi-Domain Battle next year.

http://breakingdefense.com/2016/11/us-pacific-commitments-will-survive-duterte-trump-adm-harris/
 
.
Back
Top Bottom