Durand Line is international border: US

[RazPaK]

no i mean 4 wars for Kashmir & 20 years of state sponsored insurgency certainly can't be called "peaceful methods".

Refer to post #11.

 

[Rusty]

Ok, I think u didn't get my post... When Pakistan/you talk about K word, you ask third country to interfare. While in other issue, U don't.. Hope u got my intention...


I was refraining the K word to avoid any troll war..

Kashmir is a disputed territory with a file in the UN. Pakistan asking for UN help is perfectly normal.
Durand Line is between Afghanistan and Pakistan only, no file in the UN or any other 3rd party.
And yes we got your intentions to troll.

 

[Rusty]

no i mean 4 wars for Kashmir & 20 years of state sponsored insurgency certainly can't be called "peaceful methods".

47, Pakistan didn't even have a military so officially Pakistan didn't do squat.
The Pathan tribes acted as a proxy in a dispute between Pakistan and the Maharajah, India should have minded its own business, just like Pakistan minded it's business when India officially invaded Hyderabad and other principalities. so war 1 was due to Indian greed.

65 Pakistan started it, but only due to Indian interference in 47

71 India started after it decided to one again put it's nose in Pakistani business.

Almost all the problems in South Asia is due to India being the bully and trying to throw it's weight around.
If India would mind it's own business then South Asia would be a million times more peaceful

 

[kumarkumar1867]

A third party nation is creating stink between next door neighbors. Why?

Cheap tricks played by western countries always results roots for issues/problems in asian countries.
If the US diplomat is serious this issue may worsen relation between afghanistan & pakistan. Hope none of these country doesnt fall for this trick.

or an indian in high late night dreams abut you ?

Boss, I was talking against US diplomat.

Pehli baar Pakistan ke side li toh ye Uskaa ye Sila?

 

[A.Rafay]

I think Karzai govt is pressing US to raise this issue and great conspiracy!

 

[MST]

47, Pakistan didn't even have a military so officially Pakistan didn't do squat.
The Pathan tribes acted as a proxy in a dispute between Pakistan and the Maharajah, India should have minded its own business, just like Pakistan minded it's business when India officially invaded Hyderabad and other principalities. so war 1 was due to Indian greed.

65 Pakistan started it, but only due to Indian interference in 47

71 India started after it decided to one again put it's nose in Pakistani business.

Almost all the problems in South Asia is due to India being the bully and trying to throw it's weight around.
If India would mind it's own business then South Asia would be a million times more peaceful

71 was the payback with interest for operation gibraltar. The only difference was that you folks failed in your effort and we succeeded. Had the results been different you wouldn't be complaining would you. Results are secondary its the intention that matters. Why did your Generals launch operation Gibraltar when Kashmir was already in UN. Why not follow the process of dialogue.

Aap karo to chamatkar aur hum karein to balat kar. Wah wah

 

[OrionHunter]

The Afghans say the treaty a single page containing seven clauses, was written in English which late AmirAbdur Rehman Khan could neither read nor understand.

UNBELIEVABLE!! So he accepted such an important agreement even though he couldn't read or understand it?? Jeeez!

 

[SamranAli]

the more afgan will create these types of issues more they will suffer in long run..

 

[Rusty]

71 was the payback with interest for operation gibraltar. The only difference was that you folks failed in your effort and we succeeded. Had the results been different you wouldn't be complaining would you. Results are secondary its the intention that matters. Why did your Generals launch operation Gibraltar when Kashmir was already in UN. Why not follow the process of dialogue.

Aap karo to chamatkar aur hum karein to balat kar. Wah wah

Revenge? What are you a cartoon supervillian?

71 was India being opportunistic and taking her chance against Pakistan.
And the difference was that in 65 you fought the Pakistani military only
while in 71 we were fighting a civil war that was on the other end of the subcontinent and you guys just walked in for the easy pickings.
This is no "complaining" this is facts.

It's hard to follow dialogue with a nation that promises a plebiscite but never delivers.
India had already been proven to be a lier, only fools would take its word on anything.

And I don't understand that gibberish at the end, please use English only

 

[MST]

Revenge? What are you a cartoon supervillian?

71 was India being opportunistic and taking her chance against Pakistan.
And the difference was that in 65 you fought the Pakistani military only
while in 71 we were fighting a civil war that was on the other end of the subcontinent and you guys just walked in for the easy pickings.
This is no "complaining" this is facts.

It's hard to follow dialogue with a nation that promises a plebiscite but never delivers.
India had already been proven to be a lier, only fools would take its word on anything.

And I don't understand that gibberish at the end, please use English only

Sir Please read about operation gibraltar. Pakistani regulars launched guerrilla war in Kashmir disguised as locals. The India Pakistan regular war started later. Though you can believe what you want to believe. And plebisit was promised with conditions which Pakistan never fulfilled. So you can't blame us. In the end its Pakistan which is its worst enemy and discredited itself on world stage with actions like 48, 65, 71 and 99

 

[Tshering22]

A third party nation is creating stink between next door neighbors. Why?

Well, now that US has shown explicit interest in the Durrand Line, be prepared to handle some serious western border trouble when NATO pulls out.

Sir Please read about operation gibraltar. Pakistani regulars launched guerrilla war in Kashmir disguised as locals. The India Pakistan regular war started later. Though you can believe what you want to believe. And plebisit was promised with conditions which Pakistan never fulfilled. So you can't blame us. In the end its Pakistan which is its worst enemy and discredited itself on world stage with actions like 48, 65, 71 and 99

You're talking a language he won't understand.

The only language his types understands is the language that Israelis use against their foes. Sheer force.

 

[Areesh]

Well, now that US has shown explicit interest in the Durrand Line, be prepared to handle some serious western border trouble when NATO pulls out.

These posts by you Bharatis are boring. Be prepared. A trouble is coming. Blah blah. You Indians don't even know how to spell Duran Line and here you are predicting sh!t about that border.

Predictions of you India are lame in most cases because of your low IQ. Why don't you understand this fact?

Title of Article should be : US diplomat high on Afgani Opium

He might be high on anything but still he is representative of your father and a super power. Never forget this fact.

 

[Shimly]

Boss, I was talking against US diplomat.

Pehli baar Pakistan ke side li toh ye Uskaa ye Sila?

Hahahahaha, you are trying to tell us that you are on pakistani side

 

[kumarkumar1867]

He might be high on anything but still he is representative of your father and a super power. Never forget this fact.

Dude Be Civil.
World knows who slept with US & get aid $$$ for that, who got scr*wed in WOT & how Taliban was born, how taliban & US are scr*wing whom daily.

Hahahahaha, you are trying to tell us that you are on pakistani side

Honestly, I was.
Why will I support a oppurtunist western country to interfere in matter of asian neighbours countries??

 

[BATMAN]

This is quite a change of policy by American policy makers. Few years back they them self raised the issue of Durrand line and decalred it controvertial.

I wonder what thinking is behind this U turn?